Tehnocraţi ! Când vă căraţi ?

08 iunie 2015

WORLD COMMUNIST GOVERNMENT PLANNED AND FINANCED BY USA


ON NOVEMBER 2, 1987, A FEW SHORT YEARS BEFORE THE BERLIN WALL CAME DOWN, AND only two years after the signing of the U.S.-Soviet education agreements, Mikhail Gorbachev was reported by Novosti Press Agency Publishing House in Moscow to have said in his speech to the Soviet Central Committee, “We are moving toward a new world: the world of communism. We shall never turn off that road.” Even so, after the Berlin Wall came down (1989) Gorbachev was a keynote speaker at a major Republican Party fundraiser.
"The Land of the Free", huh ?

NewsWithViews:

By Charlotte Iserbyt
May 20, 2015
NewsWithViews.com


Euro-federalists financed by US spy chiefs -...
By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard in Brussels
19 September 2000

United States Key Player in Creation of Communist One World Government aka United Nations Agenda 21 (Regional Government)

I (Charlotte) just found an old email upon which I had written "This is one of the most important pieces of paper I have ever received! I knew Baron Boel and Marjolin in Brussels in 1961 when I was working for the United States Ambassador to Belgium, Douglas MacArthur II, the nephew of General Douglas MacArthur.

All researchers: education, UN Agenda 21, ConCon, etc. should have this information. It is for that reason my education blog is making it available as a post. All areas of research are inextricably connected as they relate to imposition of world government.

Most important excerpt from Telegraph article is quoted directly below:

The head of the Ford Foundation, ex-OSS officer Paul Hoffman, doubled as head of ACUE in the late Fifties. The State Department also played a role. A memo from the European section, dated June 11, 1965, advises the vice-president of the European Economic Community, Robert Marjolin, to pursue monetary union by stealth.

It recommends suppressing debate until the point at which "adoption of such proposals would become virtually inescapable".

DECLASSIFIED American government documents show that the US intelligence community ran a campaign in the Fifties and Sixties to build momentum for a united Europe. It funded and directed the European federalist movement.

The documents confirm suspicions voiced at the time that America was working aggressively behind the scenes to push Britain into a European state. One memorandum, dated July 26, 1950, gives instructions for a campaign to promote a fully fledged European parliament. It is signed by Gen William J Donovan, head of the American wartime Office of Strategic Services, precursor of the CIA.

The documents were found by Joshua Paul, a researcher at Georgetown University in Washington. They include files released by the US National Archives. Washington's main tool for shaping the European agenda was the American Committee for a United Europe (ACUE) created in 1948. The chairman was Donovan, ostensibly a private lawyer by then.

The vice-chairman was Allen Dulles, the CIA director in the Fifties. The board included Walter Bedell Smith, the CIA's first director, and a roster of ex-OSS figures and officials who moved in and out of the CIA. The documents show that the American Committee for a United Europe (ACUE) financed the European Movement, the most important federalist organisation in the post-war years. In 1958, for example, it provided 53.5 per cent of the movement's funds.

The European Youth Campaign, an arm of the European Movement, was wholly funded and controlled by Washington. The Belgian director, Baron Boel, received monthly payments into a special account. When the head of the European Movement, Polish-born Joseph Retinger, bridled at this degree of American control and tried to raise money in Europe, he was quickly reprimanded.

The leaders of the European Movement - Retinger, the visionary Robert Schuman and the former Belgian prime minister Paul-Henri Spaak - were all treated as hired hands by their American sponsors. The US role was handled as a covert operation. The American Committee for a United Europe (ACUE) funding came from the Ford and Rockefeller foundations as well as business groups with close ties to the US government.

The head of the Ford Foundation, ex-OSS officer Paul Hoffman, doubled as head of the American Committee for a United Europe (ACUE) in the late Fifties. The State Department also played a role. A memo from the European section, dated June 11, 1965, advises the vice-president of the European Economic Community, Robert Marjolin, to pursue monetary union by stealth.

It recommends suppressing debate until the point at which "adoption of such proposals would become virtually inescapable".

Please connect the above information with relevant information below:

ON NOVEMBER 2, 1987, A FEW SHORT YEARS BEFORE THE BERLIN WALL CAME DOWN, AND only two years after the signing of the U.S.-Soviet education agreements, Mikhail Gorbachev was reported by Novosti Press Agency Publishing House in Moscow to have said in his speech to the Soviet Central Committee, “We are moving toward a new world: the world of communism. We shall never turn off that road.” Even so, after the Berlin Wall came down (1989) Gorbachev was a keynote speaker at a major Republican Party fundraiser.

Listen to this remarkable youtube video with Christopher Story and William Mcllhany. At the 4.16 mark Story quotes Gorbachev "the European Union is the new European Soviet". William H. McIlhany speaks with Author, ...

Above article originally posted at: 



© 2015 Charlotte T. Iserbyt - All Rights Reserved

6 comentarii :

Riddick spunea...

NewsWithViews - Charlotte Iserbyt

Riddick spunea...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05u1pBBziQk

Anonim G spunea...

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://www.activenews.ro/stiri/Ambasada-SUA-de-la-Bucuresti-a-arborat-steagul-homosexual-115738
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Riddick spunea...

Dacă ei cred că aşa-şi fac prieteni în România, n-au decât...

Anonim G spunea...


Iata ce-mi scrie un prieten :

''SOC la Istanbul: Papa cere REUNIFICAREA
URGENTĂ a Bisericilor Catolică si Ortodoxă! „FĂRĂ CONDITII”
Papa Francisc a lansat duminică la Istanbul un apel ferm
pentru unitatea Bisericilor Catolică si Ortodoxă, despărtite
de un mileniu,arătând că victimele războaielor si tinerii cer ca
acest pas istoric să fie făcut.

„Singurul lucru pe care îl doreste Biserica Catolică
si pe care îl urmăresc ca Episcop al Romei (...) este comuniunea cu
Bisericile Ortodoxe”, a asigurat Suveranul Pontif într-un mesaj
citit în fata Patriarhului Ecumenic al Constantinopolului, Bartolomeu I,după ce au participat împreună la o liturghie.

De o importantă exceptională în mesaj este faptul că Papa a tinut să
sublinieze că nu există nici o pretentie din partea catolicilor:

„Biserică Catolică nu doreste să impună nici o
conditie, în afara celei a profesiunii de credintă comune. Suntem gata că căutăm împreună modalitătile prin care să garantăm unitatea necesară a Bisericii în conditiile actuale.”



Francisc si-a continuat mesajul istoric:

„În lumea de astăzi se ridică cu putere voci pe care nu
putem să nu le

auzim si care cer Bisericilor noastre să-si asume până
la capăt

condiția de discipoli ai Domnului nostru Iisus Hristos”.

Bisericile Catolică si Ortodoxă s-au separat în 1054,
când Papa Leon

al IX-lea și Patriarhul Mihail I Celularie al
Constantinopolului si-au

aruncat reciproc anatema.

Printre diferentele care divizează cele două blocuri
crestine se află

celebrul Filioque (Catolicii sustin că Duhul Sfânt din
Sfânta Treime

purcede din Tatăl și din Fiul, în vreme ce Ortodocsii
cred că acesta

purcede doar din Tatăl), sau Primatul Papei
(întâietatea,

infailibilitatea si superioritatea fată de ceilalti
episcopi).

Spre deosebire de Papa, Patriarhul Constantinopolului nu are
putere reală asupra lumii ortodoxe, el având doar un rang
onorific.
Bisericile ortodoxe sunt autocefale, ele nu se subordonează unui Primat din afara tării.

Riddick spunea...

da, prin decembrie-ianuarie a zis-o. Mai dă-l în mă-sa...


Citate din gândirea profundă a europeiştilor RO:

Radu Carp, 2012: "Iar pentru a pune această întrebare în contextul României de azi, dincolo de problema naţională sau cea a păstrării Tradiţiei şi a religiei, nu cumva orice structură federală ar conveni unui stat care, oricum am lua-o, se află şi se va afla la periferia geografică a Europei ? O Românie parte a unui stat federal care să aibă aceeaşi pondere cu orice alt stat membru… ar fi sau nu în interesul naţional ? Ori este cumva în interesul naţional să menţinem aceeaşi elită birocratică necompetitivă care se auto-regenerează tocmai pentru că ne aflăm la periferie şi undele de şoc ale unui model mai eficient de organizare nu mai sunt aproape deloc resimţite ? Suveranitatea pe care unii dintre noi sunt gata să o apere cu preţul vieţii nu este nimic altceva decât un concept determinat istoric, născut pentru a legitima modelul statului centralizat împotriva unor ameninţări externe şi contestări interne".

Postări populare (nu P.P.E. !):