03 martie 2010

Paşii



O interesantă analiză pe blogul Cato Institute asupra dezastrului grecesc, şi o predicţie.

Lessons from the Greek Budget Debacle

Fiscal crises have a predictable pattern.

Step 1 occurs when the economy is prospering and tax revenues are growing faster than forecast.

Step 2 is when politicians use the additional money to increase government spending.

Step 3 is that politicians do not treat the extra tax revenue like a temporary windfall and budget accordingly.Instead, they adopt policies – more entitlements, more bureaucrats – that permanently expand the burden of the public sector.

Step 4 occurs when the economy stumbles (in part because more resources are being diverted from the productive sector to the government) and tax revenues stagnate. If the resulting fiscal gap is large enough, as it is in places such as Greece and California, a crisis atmosphere is created.

Step 5 takes place when politicians solemnly proclaim that “tough measures” are necessary, but very rarely does that mean a reversal of the policies that caused the mess. Instead, the result in higher taxes.
Greece is now at this stage. I’ve already argued that perhaps bankruptcy is the best option for Greece, and I showed the data proving that Greece has a too-much-spending crisis rather than a too-little-revenue crisis. I’ve also commented elsewhere about the feckless behavior of Greek politicians. Sadly, it looks like things are getting even worse. The government has announced a huge increase in the value-added tax, pushing this European version of a national sales tax up to 21 percent. On the spending side of the ledger, though, the government is only proposing to reduce bonuses that are automatically given to bureaucrats three times per year. Here’s an excerpt from the Associated Press report, including a typically hysterical responses from a Greek interest group:
Government officials said the measures would include cuts in civil servant’s annual pay through reducing their Easter, Christmas and vacation bonuses by 30 percent each, and a 2 percentage point increase in sales tax to bring it to 21 percent from the current 19 percent. …One government official, speaking on condition of anonymity ahead of the official announcement, said…that “we have exhausted our limits.” …”It is a very difficult day for us … These cuts will take us to the brink,” said Panayiotis Vavouyious, the head of the retired civil servants’ association.
Now, time for some predictions. It is unlikely that higher taxes and cosmetic spending restraint will solve Greece’s fiscal problem. Strong global growth would make a difference, but that also seems doubtful. So Greece will probably move to Step 6, which is a bailout, though it is unclear whether the money will come from other European nations, the European Commission, and/or the European Central Bank.

Step 7 is when politicians in nations such as Spain and Italy decide that financing spending (i.e., buying votes) with money from German and Dutch taxpayers is a swell idea, so they continue their profligate fiscal policies in order to become eligible for bailouts. Step 8 is when there is no more bailout money in Europe and the IMF (i.e., American taxpayers) ride to the rescue. Step 9 occurs when the United States faces a fiscal criss because of too much spending.

For Step 10, read Atlas Shrugged.

Explicaţii despre cartea Atlas Shrugged - aici şi aici .

UPDATE : "This is John Galt speaking"





30 de comentarii :

Despina spunea...

An incercat sa citesc cate ceva din ce ne-ai pus aici.
Este foarte interesanta postare ,excelent !
Back to the roots.Lupta pentru supravietuire este baza : obiectivitate,ratiune,calcul,logica
Mi-a placut ce-am citit despre
Ayn Rand.I-a placut si lui Alan Greenspan cum gandeste :)

Riddick spunea...

La primul link dat de blog, (pe amazon.com), se poate citi (dai click unde scrie CLICK TO LOOK INSIDE).
Am să caut cartea, încerc la librăria "Noi", de la Sala Dalles.

Despina spunea...

Sa-mi spui si mie daca o gasesti.
Mi-ar place so iau si s-o citesc
Merci

Riddick spunea...

Sigur. Pregătesc postare cu partea a doua din "Sunaţi alarma împotriva Dezvoltării Durabile", cred că termin pe la 2:00 (şi-aşa nu am somn, m-am odihnit după-amiază).

amanda13 spunea...

si care este Step 10?

si ce se intampla in cazul tarilor care, ca noi pe vremea lui motocicleanu, la step 3?

Riddick spunea...

Step 10 este "vazand si facand".

Daca treci de 3, ajungi la 5 si iei hotararea daca mai vrei asa sau nu.

John Galt spunea...

Mai bine puneai link-ul asta.

:)

Eu de vro 2 ani incerc sa-i conving pe toti prietenii cu firme etc sa zica PAS.

Acesta e motivul pentru care ma retrag in munti de vro 4 5 ani (in cautare de microhidrocentrale), chestie care mi-a prins foarte bine pana acum si pe care o recomand oricui.

:)

Riddick spunea...

Deh... trebuie să ai CONT să te poţi loga la link... :)

Lupta este de uzură, se duce oră de oră, zi de zi.

John Galt spunea...

Who is John Galt
Posted 09-01-2010 at 14:03 by John Galt

For twelve years you've been asking "Who is John Galt?" This is John Galt speaking. I'm the man who's taken away your victims and thus destroyed your world. You've heard it said that this is an age of moral crisis and that Man's sins are destroying the world. But your chief virtue has been sacrifice, and you've demanded more sacrifices at every disaster. You've sacrificed justice to mercy and happiness to duty. So why should you be afraid of the world around you?

Your world is only the product of your sacrifices. While you were dragging the men who made your happiness possible to your sacrificial altars, I beat you to it. I reached them first and told them about the game you were playing and where it would take them. I explained the consequences of your 'brother-love' morality, which they had been too innocently generous to understand. You won't find them now, when you need them more than ever.

We're on strike against your creed of unearned rewards and unrewarded duties. If you want to know how I made them quit, I told them exactly what I'm telling you tonight. I taught them the morality of Reason -- that it was right to pursue one's own happiness as one's principal goal in life. I don't consider the pleasure of others my goal in life, nor do I consider my pleasure the goal of anyone else's life.

I am a trader. I earn what I get in trade for what I produce. I ask for nothing more or nothing less than what I earn. That is justice. I don't force anyone to trade with me; I only trade for mutual benefit. Force is the great evil that has no place in a rational world. One may never force another human to act against his/her judgment. If you deny a man's right to Reason, you must also deny your right to your own judgment. Yet you have allowed your world to be run by means of force, by men who claim that fear and joy are equal incentives, but that fear and force are more practical.

You've allowed such men to occupy positions of power in your world by preaching that all men are evil from the moment they're born. When men believe this, they see nothing wrong in acting in any way they please. The name of this absurdity is 'original sin'. That's inmpossible. That which is outside the possibility of choice is also outside the province of morality. To call sin that which is outside man's choice is a mockery of justice. To say that men are born with a free will but with a tendency toward evil is ridiculous. If the tendency is one of choice, it doesn't come at birth. If it is not a tendency of choice, then man's will is not free.

John Galt spunea...

And then there's your 'brother-love' morality. Why is it moral to serve others, but not yourself? If enjoyment is a value, why is it moral when experienced by others, but not by you? Why is it immoral to produce something of value and keep it for yourself, when it is moral for others who haven't earned it to accept it? If it's virtuous to give, isn't it then selfish to take?

Your acceptance of the code of selflessness has made you fear the man who has a dollar less than you because it makes you feel that that dollar is rightfully his. You hate the man with a dollar more than you because the dollar he's keeping is rightfully yours. Your code has made it impossible to know when to give and when to grab.

You know that you can't give away everything and starve yourself. You've forced yourselves to live with undeserved, irrational guilt. Is it ever proper to help another man? No, if he demands it as his right or as a duty that you owe him. Yes, if it's your own free choice based on your judgment of the value of that person and his struggle. This country wasn't built by men who sought handouts. In its brilliant youth, this country showed the rest of the world what greatness was possible to Man and what happiness is possible on Earth.

Then it began apologizing for its greatness and began giving away its wealth, feeling guilty for having produced more than ikts neighbors. Twelve years ago, I saw what was wrong with the world and where the battle for Life had to be fought. I saw that the enemy was an inverted morality and that my acceptance of that morality was its only power. I was the first of the men who refused to give up the pursuit of his own happiness in order to serve others.

To those of you who retain some remnant of dignity and the will to live your lives for yourselves, you have the chance to make the same choice. Examine your values and understand that you must choose one side or the other. Any compromise between good and evil only hurts the good and helps the evil.

If you've understood what I've said, stop supporting your destroyers. Don't accept their philosophy. Your destroyers hold you by means of your endurance, your generosity, your innocence, and your love. Don't exhaust yourself to help build the kind of world that you see around you now. In the name of the best within you, don't sacrifice the world to those who will take away your happiness for it.

This world will change.

:)

Riddick spunea...

Wow... :)

Despina spunea...

Eu voi citi maine
Noapte buna

Riddick spunea...

Noapte bună. Am restanţa cu Dezvoltarea Durabilă, o scot până dimineaţă.
Google Translate + ajustări/corectari.

Despina spunea...

Take your time :)

Riddick spunea...

:)

John Galt spunea...

Daca e nevoie de alte explicatii:

Link: Who is John Galt

Cred ca ar merge pus si in articol.

:)

Riddick spunea...

OK, pun chiar acum ! :)

John Galt spunea...

Ma mir ca nu stiai de Ayn Rand, asta e baza pe care de la Reagan pana la Greenspan (care in tinerete a fost chiar indragostit) absolut toti au creat ceea ce numim azi economie.

part 1 .. link2 ( e un playlist mai lung, sunt 3 variante).

Riddick spunea...

La linkul de la 00:46 este "embedding disabled by request", caut un alt clip.

OK, #1 & #13.

Ştiam de Ayn Rand, dar nu foarte sistematizat.

OK, pun clipurile.

John Galt spunea...

La subiectul asta ma gandeam acu ceva timp sa iau eu filmele si sa le traduc in romaneste. Am chiar un prieten care e actor (Orodel) care s-ar potrivi perfect ca soundtrack, dar si imagine (din cand in cand).

Cu prima ocazie cand am ceva timp ma apuc serios de treaba asta - acum sunt prins pana peste cap cu diverse contracte extrem de grele.

Sper sa-mi iasa mai repede poate trecem la treaba.

:)

Riddick spunea...

Bagă cărbuni !

"Break a leg !" :)

John Galt spunea...

Noul meu nick pe blogger.

:)

Riddick spunea...

The new nick rocks !

Despina spunea...

Excelente clipuri .Cred ca o sa le mai imprastii si eu pe uncde cred ca merg,bineinteles mentionand sursa ( sursele).
Ar fi nemaipomenit sa incercam sa traducem cateva clipuri mai importante-eu cred ca multa lume asteapta asta .
Eu nu stiu cum sa inserez subtitrarea la un video.

Iar Ayn Rand- Incerc maine sa ma duc la Sala Dalles poate gasesc ceva.Au cartile puse in calculator?

Riddick spunea...

Nu, nu sunt în format electronic, nici macar nu ştiu dacă le au.

Despina spunea...

Ma refeream daca au evidenta cartilor pe calculator.

Riddick spunea...

A, îmi dădusem seama după primul răspuns.

Trebuie căutat pe net "Librăria Noi", lângă Sala Dalles, poate au site.

Despina spunea...

Ce comentariu am gasit pe The Economist-un link data de MNeamtu:

"When China is the World’s de facto superpower, we will all miss being oppressed by the US"

Riddick spunea...

Haha, credeam ca The economist a dat link din M. neamţu ( de ce nu, la o adică...).

China are probleme mari, importă energie şi materii prime pe scară mare (ca şi Japonia, dar diferenţa de eficienţă a folosirii lor este mare).

Nici vorbă.

Despina spunea...

Corect, de ce nu ?
MN poate ajunge departe de tot


Citate din gândirea profundă a europeiştilor RO

Andrei Cornea, 2011: "Dacă statele rămân suverane, ele vor continua să facă ceea ce cred şi ceea ce consideră că le este de folos, în pofida intereselor comune. Rezultă că trebuie mers înainte – mai repede sau mai încet – spre un sistem federal sau măcar confederal, cu un guvern central dotat cu puteri mari în domeniul economiei, apărării şi externelor, cu un parlament bicameral după modelul american şi cu guverne ale statelor responsabile numai pentru afacerile interne, justiţie, educaţie, cultură, eventual sănătate şi muncă. Căci atunci când vorbim despre pierderea suveranităţii naţionale, despre cine anume vorbim în fapt ca fiind „perdanţii“? Despre plătitorii obişnuiţi de impozite, cu rate la bănci, cu salarii ameninţate ba de tăieri, ba de inflaţie? Despre pensionarii cu pensiile în pericol? Despre beneficiarii sistemelor de asigurări ce acumulează datorii peste datorii? Despre şomeri? Nu, ci vorbim despre elitele politice europene din cele 27 de state. Ele sunt acelea care şi-ar pierde suveranitatea – mai ales aceea de a cheltui nestăvilit şi de a face promisiuni imposibil de ţinut. Vor trebui să se consoleze mulţi parlamentari naţionali cu un rol mai modest (dar deloc neglijabil). Dintre miniştrii şi funcţionarii guvernamentali, unii, precum cei de la externe sau de la armată, vor trebui să dispară pur şi simplu."

 

Postări populare: