Endgame
This is a good time to step back and look at the big picture. The following 24 minute interview on the Trilateral Commission was aired last week by WHDT on the east coast, reaching a potential of 6 million viewers. It is an appropriate background for the current discussion.
Every Administration since Jimmy Carter has been dominated by this group of super-elitists. The economic policies they implemented were accomplished with leadership from their own members as they worked their way into top levels of governments around the world.
In the U.S., the Commission began its hegemony over the U.S. Executive Branch with the selection of Jimmy Carter and Walter Mondale to run on the presidential ticket in 1975. First, they inducted them into membership and “trained” them in matters of foreign and economic policy. Secondly, they backed and orchestrated their successful election, with ample help from members of the media who were also represented on the Commission. Thirdly, as soon as Carter was inaugurated, he filled his cabinet and other key appointments with fellow members of the Trilateral Commission.
No less than twenty eight percent of the U.S. membership of the Trilateral Commission ended up serving in the Carter Administration. Mind you, the North American members only represented one-third of the total membership – the others were from Europe and Japan!
So, whose policies were actually implemented in the U.S.? Not American policies. Not Congress-created or approved policies. Not Constitutional policies. Rather, it was the globalist policies hammered out in private meetings by Commissioners from Europe, Japan and North America!
Since 1976, six out of eight World Bank presidents appointed by the U.S. President have been Commission members; eight out of eleven U.S. Trade Representatives; seven out of twelve Secretaries of State; nine out of thirteen Secretaries of Defense. Of our executive leaders, members have included Jimmy Carter, Walter Mondale, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Al Gore and Dick Cheney.
Not bad for such a tiny group that picks its own members, writes its own policies, and then launches their members into public office. In the early 1980′s, a member of the Commission actually responded to me that it was just coincidence and that the high quality of people within the Commission made it a compelling resource to pull appointees from. He lied; not just a passive lie or withholding of part of the truth – he completely and falsely misled with intent to deceive and conceal.
As 2012 draws to a close, the Trilateral Commission is “first and ten” on the goal line of fulfilling all of its original objectives, especially the creation of a “New International Economic Order.”
As I have previously written, however, the ultimate Trilateral goal is to establish an economic system based on Technocracy: A “green” economy that will be regulated by energy (and carbon) as opposed to supply and demand. The natural resources necessary for all production will be sequestered away into a “global trust fund” where the “trustees” will be the top global elite families. (The analogy of “global trust” and “trustees” is my own, although you will hear the term “global commons” used frequently in globalist writings.) Private property will be eliminated. Short-term essentials for staying alive will be granted to citizens in good standing with the elite. Resources needed for manufacturing will be made available only to chosen elite-connected organizations.
My favorite term for this coming New World Order is “neo-feudalism.”
Country music legend Merle Travis wrote the song “Sixteen Tons” back in 1946:
Now, some people say a man’s made out of mud,
But a poor man’s made out of muscle and blood,
Muscle and blood, skin and bones,
A mind that’s weak and a back that’s strong.
You load sixteen tons and what do you get?
Another day older and deeper in debt.
Saint Peter, don’t you call me ’cause I can’t go,
l owe my soul to the company store.
It is not enough for the global elite to merely own all the resources… they will eventually own your soul as well.
Update on Benghazi
On November 1, 2012, I wrote “The Benghazi Affair: Trilateral Policy Failure Or Success?“, suggesting that the President’s National Security Adviser, Thomas Donilon, is the most likely candidate to have orchestrated the Benghazi disaster, including the editing of the CIA report that clearly stated that the attack on the Consulate was accomplished by terrorists with an al-Qaeda connection. Donilon, along with U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice, are both members of the Trilateral Commission. Plus, Donilon’s association with Obama goes way back, even to their days at Harvard.
“There is a rumor — I want to be clear, it’s a rumor — that at least two networks have emails from the National Security Adviser’s office telling a counter-terrorism group to stand down,” Gingrich said. “But they were a group in real-time trying to mobilize marines and C-130s and the fighter aircraft, and they were told explicitly by the White House stand down and do nothing. This is not a terrorist action. If that is true, and I’ve been told this by a fairly reliable U.S. senator, if that is true and comes out, I think it raises enormous questions about the president’s role, and Tom Donilon, the National Security Adviser’s role, the Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, who has taken it on his own shoulders, that he said don’t go. And that is, I think, very dubious, given that the president said he had instructions they are supposed to do everything they could to secure American personnel.”
To my knowledge, there has not been any other mention of Donilon or these “rumored” emails since then. Gingrich was careful to call his suspicions a rumor, but the details of his statement are far too specific and plausible to dismiss.
Whatever twisted and non-American policies that are being carried out in the Mideast, both Trilaterals Donilon and Rice are in the middle of the heat.
Niciun comentariu :
Trimiteți un comentariu