20 august 2020

Almost every country has been plunged into a dystopian nightmare


Chiar şi cele "oficial covido-negaţioniste" precum Belarus - acolo agenţii patogeni sunt vizibili, au două picioare şi li se văd clar mişcările.
Lukashenko and his circle cultivated these ideologies and influence groups as a bogeyman for the Kremlin and used them to prevent the growth of ‘Russian influence’ that he saw as a threat to his political regime. The work of Western-funded ‘non-government organizations’ and psychological operations of Euro-Atlantic structures were in fact allowed in Belarus, while any pro-Russian organization was immediately suppressed and destroyed.

The Irish Savant:

A question for you

I'm going to summarise at very high level what we currently know about Covid-19 and at the end of that I'll ask you a genuine question. First we know that Covid fatalities for the the working age population and younger are lower than those for the traditional flu. If you're below 50 and in good health you're - quite literally - more likely to die from a lightening strike than from Covid. Nobody seems to know anybody who's died from it. We know that lock-down does not reduce infection rates and probably renders the eventual outcome worse for those locked down. We know that masks are largely useless and are, like lock-down, probably counter-productive. We know that the herd immunity threshold is extremely low at about 20%. We know that much of the science on which on which Government advice is based has been debunked (like Ferguson's models) a fact reflected in the wildly varying guidance on masks and ventilators, to name but two.

Yet despite all of this information being available to anyone capable of using a search engine almost every country has been plunged into a dystopian nightmare where freedoms taken for granted only a few months ago have been summarily withdrawn. The Premier of Victoria State in Australia gloats at how cops have smashed the windows of cars and dragged non-conforming citizens out onto the street. The economic and social damage has been incalculable and unprecedented, even, arguably, in war time. And now, just as deaths are falling TPTB are limbering up to impose an even more draconian regime.

So my question to you is this: How are they getting away with it? Why are the voices calling out the scam been so few, even from those whose livelihoods are being destroyed before their eyes? (We can rule out anything from the whores in politics and media of course). Take dentists as an example. I have a friend working as one in England. He says that the new regulations are so intrusive and draconian that under them he - all dentists - will no longer be able make a living. He plans to take early retirement. So where's the dentists' union on this? Same goes for executives and employees in travel, tourism, aircraft manufacturing and countless other sectors. Bear in mind that, in the West at least, relatively minor economic hardships, such as tax increases, can galvanise an outraged reaction, crowds on the streets, capitulation by governments.

In particular I have in mind tenured academics and surgeons/consultants. Such people act like emperors within their own fiefdoms. They lie like coiled vipers, ready to strike at the first hint of intrusion. Yet most have been silent. Why? These people are untouchable. Or at least they seemed to be. Mountains of non peer-reviewed rubbish in their specialised domains are published without demur. Now of course most dissenting voices in our new Orwellian world have been banished from social media platforms and internet search engines. But why do "eminent" professionals write and broadcast in support of the scam? How are the NWO globalists exerting their control over such people? I really don't know. Do you?

5 comentarii :

Riddick spunea...

Once again, the history gives a lesson that any strong leader that believes that he can make a deal and develop a fruitful cooperation with the neo-liberal-dominated West leads his country to chaos and often dies himself. The cases of Slobodan Milosevic, Muammar al-Gaddafi and even Saddam Hussein that was destroying his ballistic rockets on cameras in an attempt to please the US-led ‘international community’ appeared to be not enough for Lukashenko.

Therefore, if the opposition says that it has no intention to change the ‘foreign policy course’, it means that it is going to do what Lukashenko is already doing, but better. The aforementioned statement of the coordination council is also attempt to compensate the public damage from the spread of its official national security strategy that presidential candidate Svetlana Tsikhanovskaya was promoting during the campaign. This national security strategy directly states about the need to break ties with Russia, withdraw from ‘Russia-led’ structures and move towards NATO and the EU. This is fully in the framework of statements made publicly by representatives of the opposition leadership on a daily basis.

Rhetoric of Polish and Lithuanian-oriented opposition media and activists have a clear anti-Russian direct despite the fact that Moscow demonstrates that it is not seeking to intervene into the Belarusian internal policy and even became a target of provocations organized by the Lukashenko regime. Despite the fact that these hardcore pro-Western and anti-Russian views are supported less than 5% of the population, this small group receives the direct financial, diplomatic, media and clandestine support from the West.

This anti-Russian rhetoric, revealing the real face of the opposition leadership is needed for the particular purpose: to fuel the anti-Russian hysteria in order to not allow it to intervene when the Western-controlled opposition and Euro-Atlantic structures overthrow Lukashenko and start looting billion-worth industrial facilities of the country. This works like an ordinary corporate raid, when the raider (Euro-Atlantic financiers) exploits the pseudo-ideology and the protest in order to seize properties of a third party. The only party that has means and facilities to prevent this scenario or became a competitor to this raider is Russia. This is why the opposition has already started the nationalist-driven anti-Russian propaganda campaign.

https://southfront.org/uncovering-faces-of-belarusian-opposition/

Riddick spunea...

As of August 19, the situation in Belarus remains very complicated with contradictory tendencies in the internal political sphere. On the one hand, protests continue and the media, financial and organization support of protests from foreign actors have been growing. On the other hand, almost 2 weeks passed since the August 9 presidential election and the maidan coup scenario failed. Even the national-wide strike remains the mostly propaganda construct rather than the real strike affecting the entire country. If one compares this with the agenda of the Polish Telegram channel NEXTA, the media pillar of pro-Western nationalist agenda of protests, he would find that the opposition goal was to trigger the destructive scenario, including the fall of the Lukashenko regime or at least the start of the civil conflict, by August 12-13. Additionally, supporters of Lukashenko held several rallies in Minsk and other Belarusian cities in the past few days. These rallies collected mostly residents of small towns and villages and was especially strong in eastern Belarus. However, they played an important role demonstrating that the opposition narrative about “3% support” of Lukashenko is a lie.

The fate of Belarus and the outcome of the ongoing crisis will like be determined within a month. At the same time, the danger of a direct civil conflict and chances of a direct military clash of external actors on the territory of Belarus have been increasing. In any scenario, as a result of the crisis, Belarus will lose a part of its sovereignty and suffer a major blow to its industrial potential.

Anonim spunea...

Ca Lukashenco a luat-o cam de multa vreme pe aratura , asta s-a vazut de mai multe ori in ultimii zece ani . N-am stiut noi caci , cine dracu-i interesat de ce se-ntampla la Minsk sau pe aiurea prin Belarus insa , din iesirile turbatului asta pe sticlele TV se vedea clar ca-i dus cu pluta puterii absolute . Intrebare : presupunand ca Putin va spune GATOV LUKASHENCO , PASHOL DURAK CELOVEK ,ce se vor face aia din Belarus fara gazele rusesti caci , se stie macar asta si anume ca , depind in proportie de 99% de ele ??? Cum se va descurca gagicutza aia Svetlana Tsikhanovskaya intr-o atare situatie caci , daca in Romania iarna vine abia prin Noiembrie in schimb la Minsk in Noiembrie crapa pietrele ? Crede cineva ca Moscova va permite sosirea ajutorului european sau american ? Ce dracu frate , totusi nu mai suntem in 1944 iar Putin este mai periculos decat Stalin tocmai pentru ca ...are in spate o intreaga armata de informatii , nu doar de represiune . Stie , inainte ca aia s a faca ceva , ce vor sa faca ! Nu ca le-asi plange d e mila...M-am bagat s a fac un comentariu deoarece , dupa chestia cu COVID 19 , este cam cel mai fierbinte subiect . ASTA ...nu alegerile din Romania !

Riddick spunea...

Nu cred că Putin îşi mai permite greşeli, ca cu Ucraina, unde "omul lui" (Ianukovici) negocia Tratatul de Asociere la UE (!!!). Să vedem noul guvern de la Minsk, dacă va mai fi la Externe acelaşi Vladimir Makei ("agent vest") ar însemna că Lukaşenko e de partea vestului. Aşa ştiam, că guvernul ("cu Makei") ar fi fost demis de Lukaşenko, şi va veni alt guvern. Să vedem, ce "alt guvern".

Riddick spunea...

Cam la fel a făcut Carol al II-lea cu Titulescu: a demis guvernul şi a doua zi a numit altul... fix fără Titulescu. Îl dibuise, chit că şi Carol II făcea jocul străinilor.


Citate din gândirea profundă a europeiştilor RO

Andrei Marga, 1995 ("Filosofia Unificării Europene"): "Identificările etnice ale românilor sunt în mare parte tradiţionale. Acestea caută să abată atenţia de la problemele concrete ale prezentului şi de la nevoia modernizării instituţionale spre abstracţiunile trecutului. Pentru mulţi intelectuali este limpede că naţionalismul, prin demagogia sa, generează stagnarea şi degradarea ce favorizează doar grupuri sociale incapabile să se adapteze lumii moderne. Intrarea în noua Europă, nu doar geografic, ci şi instituţional şi cultural presupune mai mult decât o alegere, presupune o schimbare a modului de gândire, de asumare, pe lângă devizele paneuropene, a unei abordări europene, o abordare disponibilă la compararea performanţelor, orientată spre modernizare şi având ca perspectivă unitatea europeană". 

 

Postări populare: