05 ianuarie 2017

CIA-NSA gun battle



Something's just around the corner, folks, and I think it's something BIG...


WhatDoesItMean.com:

Trump Explodes In “Cold Anger” After CIA-NSA Gun Battle In Lower Manhattan

An intriguing Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) report circulating in the Kremlin today states that President-elect Donald Trump “exploded in cold anger” yesterday after a specialized Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) infiltration team attempted to enter into one of the National Security Agencies (NSA) most secure sites in Lower Manhattan (New York City) in the early morning hours—and that resulted in running gun battle between “armed operatives” of these two US spy organizations leaving, at least, 1 wounded. [Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]



According to this report, SVR electronic-surveillance analysts, yesterday, detected an encrypted satellite “distress communication” emanating from the top-secret NSA listening station code-named TITANPOINTE (formerly called the Long Lines Building) in Lower Manhattan, and that was nearly instantly followed by a, likewise, series of “encrypted satellite communications” emanating from the CIA headquarters building in Langley, Virginia.

The SVR analysis of these NSA-CIA “communications”, this report continues, shows that at approximately 04:15hrs (New York Time (GMT-4) yesterday, a specialized CIA infiltration team attempted to gain access to the NSA listening post TITANPOINTE located at 33 Thomas Street, but were quickly repelled by armed NSA operatives who then gave chase resulting in a running gun battle that ended at the intersection of Essex and Hester streets at 04:35hrs—at that resulted in, at least, 1 CIA operative being wounded in the shoulder, and who immediately afterwards was admitted to New York-Presbyterian Hospital, but refused to talk to local police officials.



Nearly 10 hours after this NSA-CIA gun battle, this report notes, President-elect Trump was notified by the Obama regime that his scheduled intelligence briefing on the “fake news” Russian hacking charade was being cancelled and rescheduled—causing America’s new leader to “explode in cold anger” and state on Twitter: “The "Intelligence" briefing on so-called "Russian hacking" was delayed until Friday, perhaps more time needed to build a case. Very strange!”

To the “Russian hacking case” President-elect Trump was referencing in his Tweet, this report explains, revolves around the emails of former Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta that were released by Wikileaks—and that Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has repeatedly stated were not given to this international whistle blowing organization by Russia or any other state actor.

As to how the Obama-Clinton “Russian hacking case” charade began, this report details, was shortly after the release of the Podesta emails this past October (2016) when Russia’s Sputnik News Agency misinterpreted a single email, but quickly corrected their mistake—and that was seized upon as a cause célèbre by the over 4,000 American mainstream propaganda journalists supporting Hillary Clinton who had failed in their bid claiming these emails were fakes.



Most insidiously, however, this report continues, the American magazine Newsweek and its Hillary Clinton-adoring writer Kurt Eichenwald then began sending out hundreds of emails and Tweets fooling large numbers of people into believing that he found proof that: 1) the documents in the WikiLeaks archive were altered; 2) Russia put forgeries into the WikiLeaks archive; 3) Sputnik knew about the WikiLeaks archive ahead of time, before it was posted online; 4) WikiLeaks coordinated the release of the documents with the Russian government; and 5) the Russian government and the Trump campaign coordinated to falsely attribute Eichenwald’s words to Blumenthal.

Within 24 hours of Newsweek’s Eichenwald sending out his emails and Tweets claiming, but not providing, his “Russian proof”, this report notes, the Obama regimes Department of Homeland Security (DHS), on 7 October, issued a document titled Joint Statement from the Department Of Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence on Election Security that, in part, stated: “Some states have also recently seen scanning and probing of their election-related systems, which in most cases originated from servers operated by a Russian company. However, we are not now in a position to attribute this activity to the Russian Government.”



From 7 October when the Obama regimes DHS issued this statement refuting Eichenwald’s “Russian hacking” claims, SVR analysts in this report explain, no other such spurious allegations against Russi were made by the US (either government or mainstream media)—that is until the week before prior to the Electoral College voting, on 19 December, to confirm Donald Trump as the next president of the United States.

And from that time to now, this report continues, the Obama regime, Hillary Clinton and the US mainstream propaganda media have continued to maintain one of the greatest, and most shamefully dishonest, political charades ever witnessed in American history—first begun by anonymous CIA leaks to the Washington Post alleging Russian hacking of Podesta’s emails, and culminating in the DHS, again, issuing a report, on 29 December, titled GRIZZLY STEPPE – Russian Malicious Cyber Activity, that says in its opening Disclaimer: “The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) does not provide any warranties of any kind regarding any information contained within.”

In other words, “none of this may be true”.



As to how untrue and totally false this DHS report was, in fact, this report states, is evidenced by every single global expert on hacking slamming it—including Jeffrey Carr, a cybersecurity consultant, author, and founder of the Suits and Spooks conference, who stated in his report titled FBI/DHS Joint Analysis Report: A Fatally Flawed Effort: “analysis that the report merely lists every threat group ever reported on by a commercial cybersecurity company suspected of having ties to Russia, labeling them “Russian Intelligence Services,” without evidence that any such connection exists.”

Likewise, this report notes, Robert M. Lee, the CEO and founder of the critical infrastructure cyber security company Dragos, in his report titled Critiques of the DHS/FBI’s GRIZZLY STEPPE Report states about the Obama regimes DHS report that it “reads like a poorly done vendor intelligence report stringing together various aspects of attribution without evidence.”

Concurring with global internet security experts Carr and Lee too, this report further notes, is the Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Glen Greenwald’s Intercept News Service—who in examining all of Edward Snowden’s top secret NSA documents, their top internet security expert, Sam Biddle, slammed the Obama regimes DHS Russian hacking claims by stating: “all we have is the allusion to the evidence, not the evidence”.




Want to know more? Click HERE.

Most unfortunately however, this report states, are that the American people are not being told by their “fake news” propaganda mainstream media how totally false these Russian hacking claims are—and who are, instead, having these presstitutes continuing to push this lie as far as they can by blacklisting from their articles and television newscasts not only the global internet security experts mentioned in this report, but anyone who would even dare tell these people the truth.

And with the US military controlled NSA siding with President-elect Trump, this report concludes, by the events that occurred in New York City yesterday, it is more than obvious that the CIA is attempting to corrupt the intelligence showing how big this Obama regime lie is about Russian hacking—and that, at least, President-elect Trump knows the truth of too.



2 comentarii :

Gabriel spunea...

Instituţiile/statul de drept în acţiune! Am mai scris că România pare a fi servit drept poligon de încercare.
Părerea mea: se urmăreşte subminarea legitimităţii şi fragilizarea preşedintelui Trump, dacă nu i-au putut împiedica victoria în alegeri (s-a încercat inclusiv deturnarea votului lectorilor).
Astfel, se doreşte blocarea oricărei schimbări de orientare, mai ales în politica externă (de ex. abandonarea alianţelor tradiţionale - Arabia, Saudită, Qatar, Emirate - şi reconcilierea cu Rusia). Te întrebi cât de ample au putut fi şpăgile plătite într-un fel sau altul de şeici, încât să poată mobiliza în asemenea hal o parte din statul american în favoarea lor, sau să abată spre Irak reacţia după 9/11, când majoritatea atentatorilor au fost saudiţi! Iată cu adevărat un uriaş cu picioare de lut, cea mai mare putere a lumii incapabilă să pedepsească adevăraţii vinovaţi pentru cel mai mare atac asupra sa cel puţin de la Pearl Harbor încoace.
Dacă Trump nu cedează la şantaj, orice înţelegere majoră ruso-americană va fi tratată ca trădare şi Trump va fi demis. Probabil anumite măsuri minore precum retragerea scutului de la Deveselu vor fi tolerate, dar schimbări drastice precum reorganizarea/desfiinţarea NATO sau schimbarea politicii în Ucraina şi Siria - nici vorbă!
El nu are majoritate în nici în Senat nici în Cameră. Adevărata majoritate o are establishmentul transpartinic. Are mulţi duşmani în partidul său care la nevoie vor vota alături de democraţi.
Este simptomatic pentru functionarea "instituţiilor"(şi la ei!) faptul că se face caz de presupuşii hackeri ruşi, dar finanţarea masivă a campaniei şi fundaţiei Clinton de către arabi finanţatori ai terorismului este ignorată complet!
Poporul american, la fel ca şi cel român, nu mai poate fi înşelat de elite auto-învestite, nici de "instituţii". Ei nu-şi mai cred nici elitele, nici instituţiile.
Este evident că americanii de rând nu îi mai consideră pe ruşi (ci pe musulmani!) o ameninţare, altfel nu-l votau pe Trump. Ei l-au votat ştiind bine că e un admirator al lui Putin.
Agenda politică a elitelor, ca şi la noi, este complet ruptă de dorinţele, interesele şi priorităţile populaţiei. Este clar că, surprins de blitzkrieg-ul lui Trump, establishmentul politic, administrativ, militar, mediatic, financiar şi de orice natură s-a angajat într-o luptă pe viaţă şi pe moarte cu Trump şi cu poporul american.
Conflictul dintre americani şi elite nu se rezumă la republicani: şi în rândurile democraţilor s-a văzut în ascensiunea lui Sanders, care a fost învins în alegeri interne practic aranjate, într-un partid care a picat testul democraţiei, deşi îşi zice democrat (faptul acesta este ocultat de scandalul cu hackerii ruşi).

Riddick spunea...

Da, şi eu văd la fel, Trump va avea MARI PROBLEME cu Congresul.

Va trebui să fie un bun comunicator şi să se adreseze "maselor", explicându-le ce-i de explicat. Doar aşa va putea contrabalansa raportul de forţe.


Citate din gândirea profundă a europeiştilor RO

Mihai Răzvan Ungureanu, 2012: "Există o preocupare privind modul în care politicile europene pot fi puse sub semnul întrebării la nivelul executivelor şi parlamentelor naţionale de expresia politică a xenofobiei, a parohialismului politic, de atitudini antidemocratice, într-un cuvânt de atitudini antieuropene. Şi preşedintele Consiliului, şi eu considerăm că este nevoie de o dezbatere care, tehnic, poate fi legată de lucrările unui Consiliu European, antrenând factori politici de înaltă decizie, asupra valorii ideii europene şi a modului în care ne raportăm la aceasta".

Postări populare (nu P.P.E. !):