26 iunie 2011

Truman a fost un trădător



Ambasadorul unui preşedinte trădător (Obama) face jocul trădătorilor de la USL, publicând la cererea acestora o declaraţie de apreciere a unui alt trădător al SUA (Truman) la adresa lui Mihai I. 

Ultimul se încadrează în definiţia trădătorului, nu atât prin faptele sale din anii '40, cât prin cele mai din vremea noastră, începând cu Declaraţia de la Budapesta din 1989 şi terminând cu colaborarea pe faţă cu personaje dovedite ca fiind pioni ai Moscovei în România.

Truman a fost un trădător, permiţând scurgerea de informaţii "către ONU" (adică şi către URSS), în timpul războiului din Coreea. Oficial, trupele care luptau contra nord-coreenilor şi aliaţilor chinezi şi ruşi (aceştia din urmă erau piloţi şi instructori militari) erau "trupe ONU" (majoritatea americani), fiind prima dată (şi probabil singura dată) când URSS nu a votat împotriva intervenţiei armate a ONU împotriva unui agresor aliat de-al său (a boicotat lucrările Consiliului de Securitate ONU, în lipsa sa trecând rezoluţia care autoriza intervenţia militară sub steagul ONU împotriva Coreei de Nord).

Iată un articol care arată trădarea lui Truman din timpul războiului din Coreea: 


A Banker's War - with a Traitor President
 
"The United Nations is the greatest fraud in all History.

IT'S PURPOSE IS TO DESTROY THE UNITED STATES."

[Congressman John E. Rankin]

SPECIAL BULLETIN TO ALL
MILITARY MEN AND VETERANS:

LT. COLONEL "BUD" FARRELL (USAF RET.) EXPLAINS THE TRUTH:
 
When I was a young officer and jet fighter pilot flying missions in the Korean Conflict (unknowingly under the command of a Soviet General of the United Nations Security Council), I could never understand HOW THE ENEMY KNEW SO MUCH ABOUT US, as broadcast almost daily over the communist Pyongyang radio station in North Korea.

Our wives' names, childrens' names, Squadron Commander names, flight numbers, etc.! The North Koreans knew when we were coming, how many of us there were, what type of aircraft we were flying, and even the targets we were to hit. Later I realized that the naval and ground forces suffered the same fat that we did, especially our Army and Marine infantry troops.

All of our military operations had to be forwarded by radio to the Soviet Commander of the United Nations Security Council at the United Nations Building, New York City, for approval before our forces went into action against the North Koreans and Red Chinese. The Soviet Commander of the United Nations Security Council delayed the battle plans until he used the radios in the United Nations Building in New York to relay all our "battle planning information" to Moscow, North Korea and Red China.


The enemy then contacted and relayed these same battle plans to their communist forces in the field. The enemy knew when to move from an area and when to attack our smaller fighting forces. They knew beforehand when we were coming and how many of us there were. They knew everything about us all the time -- 24 hours a day!!!

I later found this same form of "treason" was used against our forces in the Viet Nam War. All information regarding "every battle plan in Viet Nam" was given to the North Vietnamese, Soviets (Advisors), and Viet Cong Troops in the filed DURING THE ENTIRE WAR. The enemy knew our every move at all times. Our troops were led like sheep to the slaughter in both Korea and Viet Nam.

Like blind fools we sent our combat plans to the enemy for approval. There was a standing joke among us fighter pilots "That Moscow had a file on each and every one us." How little did we really know.

Every mission, every movement was compromised! General Walt, former Commander of the United States Marine Corps, reflected upon this information in his book that was written in the early 1980s. This was never allowed to appear in any bookstore in the United States. During the Korean and Viet Nam conflicts, thousands of our fighting men were mentally or physically incapacitated BECAUSE OF THIS TREASON! To this day, the Soviets (or someone from one of their satellite countries) are the only ones who can command the United Nations "World Police Forces."

Each and every one of us that served in Korea or Viet Nam served under the total command of a Soviet General! Here are the names of the Soviets and the dates they served as "Under-Secretary of the Security Council of the United Nations," thus the highest military commander of all United Nations fighting forces anywhere in the world, INCLUDING ALL MILITARY FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES. These names and information was obtained from the United Nations yearbooks up through 1983. Later yearbooks were not available: (All listed below are Soviet Generals holding the office of "Under-Secretary for Security and Political Affairs"):

 1946-1949               Arkady Alexandrovich Sobolev
 1949-1953               Constantine E. Zinchenko
 1953-1954               Dragoslav Protich
 1958-1959               Antoly Dobrynin
 1960-1962               George Petrovich Arkadev
 1962-1963               Eugeny D. Kiselev
 1963-1964               Vladimir Paulovich Suslov
 1965-1967               Alexel Efremovitch Nesterenko
 1968-1973               Leonid N. Kutakov
 1973-1978               Arkadv N. Shevchenko
 1978-1980               Mikhail D. Sytenko
 1981-1983               Vlacheslav A. Ustinov
 1988                          Vasiliy Safronchuk
"The post for "Political and Security Affairs" traditionally has been held by a SOVIET NATIONAL... is Senior Advisor to the Secretary-General." [New York Times, May 22, 1963]

The Soviet Lt. General Alexandre Ph Vasiliev, the Soviet Representative on the United Nations (Mini) Military Staff Committee from 1947 to January, 1950, is the same General Vasiliev who took "a leave of absence from his United Nations job" and was PLACED BY THE SOVIET UNION AND RED CHINA IN COMMAND OF ALL CHINESE COMMUNIST TROOP MOVEMENTS ACROSS THE 38TH PARALLEL.

During the Korean "Police Action," Lt. General Vasiliev received all his military information and troop movements of all United Nations forces in Korea directly from his superior, Soviet General Constantine E. Zinchenko (see above, 1949-1953), who was served as "Under-Secretary of the Security Council of the United Nations in New York. ALL battle plans had to be APPROVED by him AHEAD OF TIME.

It was the traitor, President Harry S. Truman himself, who REFUSED TO ALLOW General Douglas MacArthur, the Supreme Commander of the United Nations fighting forces in Korea, to bomb the bridges at the Yalu River over which the Chinese Communist troops came by the hundreds of thousands to kill and wound our soldiers. Truman and the Soviet General in charge at the United Nations TOTALLY HANDCUFFED MacArthur in all instances.

General MacArthur was only in command of the fighting forces in Korea, not in command of the United Nations position as "Under-Secretary of the Security Council." A Soviet General held this position of POWER AND AUTHORITY OVER MACARTHUR and all the United Nations fighting forces in Korea. THE SAME WAS TRUE FOR VIET NAM.

When General MacArthur WOKE UP TO THE TREASON OF PRESIDENT TRUMAN and the Soviets in the United Nations, he executed one of the greatest military performances ever ventured in modern warfare. His dangerous but magnificent military engagement and sea landing at "Inchon" on September 15, 1950 enabled his military forces to slaughter the communist forces, destroy their massive supply dumps, and put the Red Chinese, North Koreans and their Soviet advisors on the run. [In other words, MacArthur kicked some ass!]

MacArthur never asked permission from the United Nations Security Council (Soviet General Zinchenko) to perform this SECRET military operation. MacArthur hand-picked close and loyal military officers in doing so, and they kept a tight lid on the entire operation. Originally, our forces were to never win any battles as planned by the Soviet Generals in the United Nations. But General MacArthur realized the treason and took positive action not only to save the lives of his fighting forces and destroying the enemy and their supply dumps, but also creating the "turning point" of the Korean War with his success at Inchon.

For this "positive action", General Douglas MacArthur was relieved of his command of the United Nations fighting forces in Korea by the traitor President Harry S. Truman.

President Truman feared General MacArthur so much that just prior to General MacArthur returning to the United States from Korea, Truman hid out at Camp David for over 3 weeks in fear of being arrested by General MacArthur, who was a 5-Star General and in command of all military forces in the United States.

This allowed the controlled press in the United States time to attack MacArthur on all fronts. Even before he returned home from Korea. Big headlines in the monthly magazines of the United States described MacArthur "As like unto Hitler returning home to the Chancellory."

With cunning control of their national news outlets over the minds of the masses in the United States, these same internationalists turned the minds of the people in the United States against MacArthur. The same man who had just saved the lives of thousands of their sons with daring military moves -- against the wishes of the United Nations Command, in routing the Red Chinese and North Koreans at Inchon.

Now you know the real truth as to what really happened "behind the scenes" during the Korean Conflict between the traitor Truman and General MacArthur, the real hero


GENERAL DOUGLAS MACARTHUR SPEAKS:


"I was worried by a series of directives from Washington (Truman) which were greatly decreasing the potential of my air force. First I was forbidden "hot" pursuit of enemy planes that attacked our own. Manchuria and Siberia were sanctuaries of inviolate protection of all enemy forces and for all enemy purposes, no matter what depredations or assaults might come from there. Then I was denied the right (by Soviet General in United Nations) to bomb the hydroelectric plants along the Yalu River. The order was broadened to include every plant in North Korea which was capable of furnishing electric power to Manchuria and Siberia."

"Most incomprehensible of all was the refusal to let me bomb the important supply center at Racin, which was not in Manchuria or Siberia, but many miles from the border, in forwarded supplies from Vladivostok for the North Korean Army. I felt that step-by-step my weapons were being taken away from me."

This is exactly the same type of "treason" that occurred against our military forces in Viet Nam. But Viet Nam was far more vile and dirty in length of time that our soldiers were betrayed. MacArthur continues on page 21:

"That there was some leak in intelligence was evident to everyone. (Brigadier General Walton) Walker continually complained to me that his operations were known to the enemy in advance through sources in Washington... information must have been relayed to them, assuring that the Yalu River bridges would continue to enjoy their sanctuary and that their bases would be left intact. They knew they could swarm down across the Yalu River without having to worry about bombers hitting their Manchurian supply lines."

General MacArthur then referred on page 21 to an official leaflet published in Red China by Chinese General Lin Piao. It read:

"I would never have made the attack and risked men and military reputation if I had not been assured that Washington would restrain General MacArthur from taking adequate retaliatory measures against my lines of supply and communication."

J. Ruben Clark, Jr., former Under-Secretary of State and Ambassador to Mexico, who was widely recognized as one of our nation's foremost international lawyers, stated on page 27 of the book entitled "The United Nations Today":

"Not only does the Charter Organization (United Nations) not prevent future wars, but it makes it practically certain that we shall have future wars, and as to such wars it takes from us (the United States) the power to declare them, to choose the side on which we shall fight, to determine what forces and military equipment we shall use in war, and to control and command our sons who do the fighting."

Planned wars by international corporate socialists money barons within the United States and throughout the world brings great profit to the majority of banks and war manufacturing plants that they control and own all across the United States. These same people got filthy rich on the "20 pieces of silver" for the lives lost and wounded of our soldiers in the Korean and Viet Nam conflicts, and they also collected billions of dollars in profit for supply "war materials" in Korea and Viet Nam.

By now you should have come to realize "why" there were so many restrictions on our soldiers during combat in Korea and Viet Nam, and why we were NOT ALLOWED TO WIN... not allowed to bomb certain targets, not allowed to really do anything in a positive manner to destroy the enemy.

Korea and Viet Nam were never planned to be won, but instead they were planned so big money could be made by the bankers and all their political lackeys who sit in Public Office all over the United States and in other governments of the world.

The Viet Nam conflict was also allowed to continue to weaken the resistance of Americans against any type of war or fight against communism. To accept anything would be better in the minds of the masses... than war and having their sons killed. Even if it meant "merging" of our entire government with that of the Soviet Union (as we presently are witnessing).



Is there still doubt in anyone's mind that the United Nations is a communistic organization with the communistic goal of world totalitarianism? Is there still doubt in anyone's mind that Canada, the Unites States of America and every country in the western world has to get out of the United Nations in order to preserve our freedom?

If there is no doubt in your mind write a letter to your government representatives and get him/her to make every effort to get your country out of the United Nations - NOW.

Thanks for your understanding and help.

Fred Kyburz

Have a great day!

Sources: patriotsonguard.org

Copyright© Patriots On Guard, September 2000
Reproduction for noncommercial purposes permitted with credit

Sent in by Kevin Dahl

5 comentarii :

Crystal Clear spunea...

Incredibil ,n-as fi crezut asa ceva !

Riddick spunea...

Nici eu nu bănuiam ceva precis, deşi, ştiind că a fost mâna dreaptă a lui F.D. Roosevelt şi că făcea parte din Partidul Democrat, trebuia să mă astept la aşa ceva. Mi s-a părut ciudat gestul lui Gitenstein, aşa că am făcut un search pe Google cu cuvintele Truman traitor şi am găsit articolul.

Crystal Clear spunea...

Ce chestie ! Google-lul asta e bun..

Riddick spunea...

Se aude că vor unii introducerea "legitimaţiei de net", adică laşi o urmă pe unde navighezi. Se vorbeşte, se vorbeşte...

Crystal Clear spunea...

Abia asteapta astia sa puna laba pe noi .....


Citate din gândirea profundă a europeiştilor RO

Călin Popescu-Tăriceanu, 2008: "Vom da astăzi, în Parlamentul României, un vot istoric - votul pentru ratificarea Tratatului de reformă al Uniunii Europene. Pentru România este mai mult decât un moment festiv. Ratificarea Tratatului de reformă marchează o etapă. Spun acest lucru din două motive. Pe de o parte, este o primă etapă pe care noi am parcurs-o în cadrul Uniunii Europene, după aderarea de la 1 ianuarie 2007. Am avut şansa să contribuim la negocierea şi la construirea acestui Tratat, beneficiind de aceleaşi drepturi şi având aceleaşi obligaţii ca oricare altă ţară europeană. Este cel dintâi tratat european semnat de România, în calitate de stat membru al Uniunii Europene. Simbolic, este primul document al Europei extinse, negociat şi semnat în format UE 27. Pentru toate aceste motive, odată cu ratificarea de către Parlament, putem spune că este cel dintâi tratat european pe care România îşi pune efectiv amprenta, conform intereselor sale, nemaifiind în postura de a prelua ceea ce au negociat şi au decis alţii. Doamnelor şi domnilor senatori şi deputaţi, în urmă cu trei ani, prin votul dumneavoastră, România a ratificat Tratatul constituţional ["Constituţia UE", caducă], odată cu ratificarea Tratatului de aderare la Uniunea Europeană. Aşa cum ştiţi, Tratatul constituţional nu a putut intra în vigoare. Din fericire, aşa cum noi am susţinut în timpul negocierilor, inovaţiile din acest document au fost preluate în Tratatul de la Lisabona. Aceste inovaţii sunt un pas înainte faţă de tratatele europene în vigoare acum."

 

Postări populare: