Funia din casa spânzuratului

Europarlamentarul PDL/PPE Iosif Matula a cerut în Parlamentul European reglementări pentru condamnarea "campaniilor de presă la comandă" şi a "şantajului mediatic". Pare o naivitate să vorbeşti de funie în casa spânzuratului, UE însăşi întreprinde campanii de presă la comandă, a se vedea numai cazul referendumului (al doilea) din Irlanda, pentru Tratatul de la Lisabona, şi despre şantaje mici sau mari la adresa diverselor state UE, nu ajunge o singură postare.

Matula este de părere că "în contextul apariţiei noilor mijloace şi procedee de comunicare, se impune elaborarea unui cod etic european al jurnalismului".

"Totodată, este nevoie de un mai mare accent, în programa şcolară, asupra unor cursuri de pregătire pentru acest nou tip de jurnalism. Iar ca o recunoaştere din partea Parlamentului European, susţin includerea noilor media printre secţiunile Premiului pentru jurnalism, pe care îl oferim anual", afirmă Iosif Matula.

Da... "cod etic european"... O contradicţie în termeni:

-The German European Economic Community ?:

ROME

Efforts to federalise by force have also been undertaken down through history. Perhaps the most noteworthy of these was the Roman Empire. The steps taken to expand the influence of Rome across the known world were as follows:

Step 1: Justify the premise for taking action against the target nation.
Step 2: Conquer the target nation militarily.
Step 3: Take the defeated nation, shatter it into several little regions, and rule it from Rome.
Step 4: Integrate these different conquered regions of the known world economically and politically.
Step 5: Bring prosperity to the people to keep them from revolting.

HITLER 

Step 1: Create a problem in the target state (the thesis).
Step 2: Engineer a huge emotional reaction to the problem (the antithesis).
Step 3: Move in militarily and offer only those solutions that result in an expansion and power of government (the synthesis). This is, of course, done in the name of the people and for their benefit, effectively silencing any opposition to the strategy.

This is the classic battle-plan of socialism, whether it is used militarily, economically or politically by the Big Government of the 'fascist right', or by the Big Government of the 'Communist left'. Either way, it's Big Government controlling all aspects of the citizen's life, with all the power and the money under control of a governing 'élite'.

THE EU - UNPOPULAR MODERN SOCIALISM

Today, the EU strategy for integration is constantly pursued, not militarily at the moment, but by stealth and coercion. It's still divide and rule. The same strategy, drawing heavily from the Nazi model which inspired it, has been planned for Britain, which is to be broken up into 12 regions, all to be centrally ruled by a centralised government in Brussels dominated by Germany and France and the countries prepared to vote with them.

Note that the EU solves the historical problems for German and French politicians, who have been traditional enemies:

* The Union secures their borders, puts them in the driving seat of the Union by expanding their influence over the less powerful countries of Europe.

* For France and Germany, the EU keeps each under the other's nose so these traditional enemies can watch each other.

* The EU forms a mighty power block to rival the only remaining superpower, America.

* By bringing Britain into the EU by coercion and deceit, the EU effectively destroys NATO's ability effectively to guard against future military ambitions on the Continent. No doubt, once Britain is safely swallowed up in the new European superstate, America and her UK bases will be told to pack up and go home by the hostile, unelected politicians in Brussels.

* Finally, and perhaps significantly, the EU can deal the ultimate death blow to Britain's traditional political and economic dominance. Britain is unfinished business for Europe, stretching back centuries. Britain must be broken up for all time and her spoils handed to the masters of the EU, dominated by France and Germany.

As we will learn, this was planned decades ago by Nazi ministers and economists, even after they expected to lose the war.

Political researcher Ashley Mote records:

"By 1938, Henri Spaak, one of the founding fathers of the EU, was openly calling himself a 'national socialist' (Nazi). He talked of Hitler's 'magnificent achievements'. He was one of the activists who encouraged Belgian rail workers to strike when Germany invaded in 1940, and he helped ensure that the British and French troops failed to establish a defensive line against the invaders.

On 22nd June 1940, Hermann Goering made the first reference to what he called 'the European Economic Community'. At a conference held in Germany at that time, it was suggested that 'England has to be evicted from the continent once and for all, and the new Europe keep its distance from the United States.'"

That same year, the former Kaiser Wilhelm wrote: "We are becoming a United States of Europe under German leadership, a united Europe."

The Nazis were making a clear distinction between the Anglo-Saxon economies on the one hand, and their own and those of the rest of the world on the other. The United States and the British Empire nations of Britain herself, South Africa, Canada, Australia and New Zealand were depicted as the liberal usurpers and economic bulldozers of the dreams and happiness of the rest of mankind. Nazi Germany had taken it upon herself to redress the balance.

By the end of 1941, Nazi domination of Europe was solidifying, with the glaring exception of Britain. To save on manpower, Hitler allowed the southern area of France to be run by the French Vichy government, which openly collaborated with the Nazis. To this day in France, the collaboration wounds are still deep. That same year, Hitler's minister Joachim von Ribbentrop commented on Germany's plan to dominate Europe economically as well as militarily, confidently proclaiming: "…[European] integration is inevitable… It is impossible to stop the trend." Where have we heard that before? 

Supporters of today's European Union claim that an integrated Europe will prevent future war. Yet true democracies do not provoke war, whereas forced or premature conglomerations of disparate nations have a proven history of causing turmoil and bloodshed (e.g. the Roman Empire, the Soviet Union, Yugoslavia and much of Africa). Every once in a while, one gets a tantalising glimpse into the EU's true agenda, sometimes voiced in an unguarded moment of political zeal:
 

"The European parliament and the commission are allies against the member states. Together we have to prevent the member states from taking back power." President of the European parliament, speaking on Radio 4, July 1999

"When we build the house of Europe, the future will belong to Germany." Helmut Kohl, speaking in Germany, unaware that reporters were present

"Germany, as the biggest and most powerful economic member state will be the leader [of Europe] whether you like it or not." Theo Waigel, former German finance minister, 1997

"The top priority is to turn the EU into a single political state." Joshka Fischer, German foreign minister, quoted in The Times, November 1998

"Never again must there be a destabilising vacuum of power in central Europe. If European integration were not to progress, Germany might be called upon, or tempted by its own security constraints, to try to effect the stabilisation on its own and in the traditional way." German CDU parliamentary committee on European affairs, September 1994

"Why does Europe need fifteen foreign ministers when one is enough? Why do member states still need national armies? One European army is enough." Hans Eichel, German finance minister, November 1999

-The mythology of the EU - Countered
 
-Propaganda: How the EU uses education and academia to sell integration
 
-Federalist Thought Control: The Brussels Propaganda Machine

-EU – an unaccountable mess created by an undemocratic treaty