20 martie 2018

E încă frig, dar "se va încălzi"


Q Alerts:

UN TOLD TO LEAVE SYRIA IMMEDIATELY- ALSO KEEP YOUR EYES ON ISRAEL- TURKEY, THEIR ARCH ENEMY, IS NOW IN SYRIA

Hey Steve:

UN workers have been told (four hours ago) to "leave Syria immediately."

The Brits have put Challenger tanks and 2,300 STAFF at the US base in Al-Tanf, Syria, with more than ten thousand actual troops!

The US has three Amphibious Assault boats full of US Marines in the eastern Mediterranean and the talk I am hearing now is an actual INVASION.

I don't know WHO is controlling our military, but it sure doesn't seem to be our President. This has disaster written all over it.

Russia will not simply sit-idly-by and let this happen. They've repeatedly stated that publicly.

We could be the bad guys who actually start WW3.

I fear for our nation.

Hal


All News PipeLine:

The Unprepared Will Die. Period. Food Shortages Across The Country As Intel Employees Are Preparing For Catastrophe


U.S. INTEL AGENCY EMPLOYEES ARE PREPARING FOR DOOMSDAY

The first link is to an article titled "Official Washington flocking to Doomsday Camps." The article isn't talking about politicians or their employees, or the "Elite," it is referencing members of some of the top U.S. intelligence agencies, such as the FBI, CIA and DIA.

National security officials are joining Fortitude Ranch, who are building "doomsday camps" across the country, which promises protection and a year's supply of food when the "inevitable" catastrophic event occurs, with one member telling he reporter that he and others had joined after "waking up" to the potential of a national crisis, stating "For most of us, something rattled our cages and woke us up."  [...]

Un comentariu :

Riddick spunea...

Deployment of British Troops and TANKS to US/NATO Base in Al Tanf, Syria - WAR PREPS

There has been a very significant deployment of British Army Troops, Challenger Tanks, Cobra Helicopters and 2,300 STAFF to the United States / NATO Al-Tanf military base. It now appears the US and its "coalition partners" are preparing to use significant force against . . . someon7e other than ISIS . . . . in the area. The only folks left in the area after the defeat of ISIS are Syria and Russian regular Army troops.

MORE: Word coming in that assets of the US Navy's 6th Fleet are deploying to participate in certain operations in Syria. ( Editor: This is starting to look very, very bad.)

Al-Tanf is a military base of the U.S.-led international coalition established in 2014 with a declared purpose of countering the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL). It is located in 23 km to the southwest from the Syrian town of Al-Tanf, in Homs Governorate. The military outpost was reportedly established in early 2016 to train anti–government fighters (″Vetted Syrian Opposition″).

The U.S. military in 2017 conceded that the presence of the U.S. troops in Syria without invitation of the Syrian government was both legally dubious and untenable in the event of Russia′s definitive opposition to it.

At the end of December 2017, the Chief of the Russian General Staff Valery Gerasimov said that the U.S. garrison at Al-Tanf was fully blocked by the Syrian government forces; he also said that the U.S. was using the base as a training facility for ex-ISIL militants.

On 8 February 2018, following the U.S. strikes in eastern Syria that resulted in multiple casualties among Russian PMCs, the Russian foreign ministry spokesperson said: ″The unlawful U.S.′ armed presence in Syria presents a serious challenge to the peace process and to the country's territorial integrity and unity. A 55-kilometer zone unilaterally created by Americans around their military base near al-Tanf is being used by the scattered units of Daesh terrorists″ for evading pursuit by government forces and re-grouping.

In mid-February 2018, Russia’s foreign minister Sergey Lavrov, in an exclusive interview with Euronews, said that U.S. military presence in Syria generally and in the area of Al-Tanf specifically was illegal and unacceptable.

Given the recent death of a former Russia spy inside Britain, and the British Government screaming blame at Russia for allegedly using a nerve agent to kill that spy (which also injured a number of others nearby), it seems that someone in Britain has gotten some bright idea about taking actions against Russia . . . inside Syria. This is especially possible because the British government has made no secret of its intent to "take action against Russia" over the alleged killing of the Spy on British soil.

There are now public claims that the killing of the spy in Britain is a FALSE FLAG, orchestrated by either the Brits, Americans or both, to set Russia up as the supplier of a nerve agent called Novichok. Trouble is, Russia destroyed all its supplies of that agent under supervision of UN observers.


http://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/news/world-news/2224-major-deployment-of-british-troops-and-tanks-to-us-nato-base-in-al-tanf-syria-war-preps


Citate din gândirea profundă a europeiştilor RO

Adrian Cioroianu, 2009 ("Şi totuşi, Europa unită există – deşi nu toţi europenii votează"): Într-o Uniune Europeană ce întârzie să-şi legifereze unitatea (din moment ce Tratatul de la Lisabona nu este ratificat de toate statele membre), într-o Uniune care nu are încă o politică externă comună şi nici o politică de securitate energetică (vezi diferenţele mari dintre state comunitare precum Italia, Germania, România sau Lituania în privinţa relaţiilor lor cu Rusia, de exemplu), într-o Uniune al cărui „euro-parlament” de la Bruxelles & Strasbourg nu prea se ştie cu ce se ocupă, lipsa unui entuziasm comunitar nu poate surprinde. În anul 2007, cu ocazia unei vizite a lui H.G. Pöttering (preşedintele Parlamentului European) în România, în numele MAE român am organizat un prânz în onoarea oaspetelui – la care au fost invitaţi mulţi dintre politicienii exponenţiali ai tuturor partidelor noastre parlamentare. Cu toţii i-am povestit dlui Pöttering cât de unanimă a fost dorinţa românilor de a adera la Uniune şi cât de mult ne-am bucurat, de la mic la mare. Zâmbind, acesta ne-a spus că nu e convins că această unanimitate ar trebui să ne entuziasmeze – cu atât mai mult cu cât nimeni nu poate garanta cât de reală era ea. Date fiind problemele ce or să apară în procesul de integrare, poate ar fi fost mai bine să ştiţi mai precis cine crede într-adevăr în Uniune şi cine nu – a spus, în rezumat, invitatul nostru. Şi cred că acest raţionament era corect. Poate o să-l înţelegem mai bine în următorii ani, în care e foarte posibil să apară şi la noi curente (politice sau intelectuale) care să pună problema în termeni mai tranşanţi: ce aduce Uniunea Europeană unui stat ca România? Beneficiile sunt mai mari decât constrângerile? Avantajele sunt superioare concesiilor? Personal, cred că răspunsul la astfel de întrebări este cert pozitiv. Dar nu exclud eventualitatea ca unii români să nu vadă lucrurile astfel – şi, mă tem, numărul lor va fi, în următorul deceniu, în creştere".

Postări populare (nu P.P.E. !):