Is the Tide Finally Starting to Turn on Covid as an American Biowarfare Attack?

Partidele anti-sistem ale Europei. Învățămintele lupilor în blană de oaie /  Ia gândiți-vă: dacă mâine Sabin Gherman își face un partid transilvănist, care să militeze contra dictaturii medicale și progresismului cucubeu, v-ați încolona în spatele lui pentru că luptă de partea binelui!? V-ați ține de braț cu Tokeș Laszlo doar pentru că e, probabil, un conservator în temele care țin de familie? Presupun că nu. Ei bine, figuri ca Salvini, militant pentru independența nordului industrializat al Italiei sau „Puidemort”, care vrea ruperea Cataluniei de Spania, au fost pompați ca alternative „anti-sistem”. Falși luptători împotriva actualei ordini mondiale. E drept că multă vreme Salvini a evoluat corect. Ca Donald Trump, până la momentele cheie. A fost un lider autentic în problema invaziei țărmului italian cu ambarcațiuni venite din Africa. Pe vremea aceea, presa de limbă engleză nu-l scotea din extremist, fascist, rasist. Observați ce scriu acum despre el aceleași gazete. Niciuna nu mai numește Liga Nordului „partid extremist”. I s-a modificat în bine și pagina de Wikipedia. A devenit ceva mai radical, dar frecventabil. Când Draghi, șeful lui pe linie guvernamentală, dictează ca nevaccinații să moară de foame pentru că sunt dați afară de la orice loc de muncă, Salvini face pe opozantul din guvern și cere un certificat verde cu valabilitate mai lungă….

Banca Națională a României, înțepată informativ de Rusia. Ică Voinea, povestea unui traficant de influență pe „codul vechi” / Despre Irina Tănase au fost multe povești – că se implică în politica PSD, ba chiar și în aspecte ale guvernării. A vorbit puțin despre asta Robert Negoiță, asemuind-o pe Irina Tănase cu Elena Ceaușescu. Dar puțini știu cine i-a dat lui Dragnea ideea de a o numi ca premier pe Viorica Dăncilă: chiar Irina! [...] Ică Florea a fost trimis de SIE lângă Viorica Dăncilă ca să o facă să își câștige independența față de Liviu Dragnea – obiectiv atins, iar mai apoi ca să o oblige într-un fel sau altul, să candideze pentru alegerile prezidențiale. Aia era misiunea cea mai importantă. De ce era importantă candidatura ei și pentru cine? Fiindcă era un gest de sacrificiu! Pentru Iohannis era foarte important ca Viorica Dăncilă să intre în turul doi. Dacă intra Barna în turul doi, astăzi Iohannis nu mai era președinte.

Dragnea, întrebat dacă Viorica Dăncilă a fost premierul ales de iubita lui: 'Un coleg a insistat să fie pe acea listă' / Fostul lider PSD Liviu Dragnea a negat duminică, la Kanal D, că Viorica Dăncilă a fost premierul ales de Irina Tănase. El a dezvăluit că propunerea a fost făcută de Ionel Arsene, actualul președinte CJ Neamț. „Nu. Mă gândeam să nu răspund la întrebarea asta că îmi produce aşa o stare neplăcută. Pot să spun acum pe scurt istoria cum s-a născut ca şi premier doamna Viorica Dăncilă. Eram într-o seară de dinaintea Comitetului Executiv de a doua zi după ce îşi dăduse demisia Mihai Tudose, era mai mulţi colegi şi am rugat să facem o listă scurtă cu nişte potenţiali prim-miniştri. Un coleg a insistat în permanenţă ca pe acea listă să fie trecută şi Viorica Dăncilă, este un om pe care cred că îl cunoaşteţi, domnul Ionel Arsene, acum e preşedinte de Consiliu Judeţean la Neamţ. A insistat într-una. În final, după câteva ore de discuţie, am ajuns toţi la concluzia că a doua zi o să propunem colegilor din Comitetul Executiv Naţional ca şi variantă pe Carmen Dan. Au plecat toţi şi cu totul întâmplător domnul Ionel Arsene a mai rămas, insistând totuşi să mergem cu Viorica Dăncilă. Sigur că decizia finală de propunere nu a fost a lui, a fost a mea. Ne-am despărţit pe la 3 dimineaţa, la 5 şi ceva m-am trezit şi am tot analizat, în sfârşit, am rămas cu ideea Viorica Dăncilă”, a afirmat Dragnea. El a precizat că Irina Tănase nu a avut legătura cu acest lucru.

China este pregătită de război pe două fronturi / Este evident faptul că „Inițiativa Belt and Road” (BRI) este o încercare pentru China de a diversifica rutele comerciale din Asia-Pacific, numai că americanii se pregătesc să le atace. Conductele care traversează Pakistanul, ca parte a Coridorului Economic China-Pakistan (CPEC) prin Myanmar, ar contribui la transportul hidrocarburilor către China din Orientul Mijlociu, fără a mai trece prin apele controlate de SUA. Cu toate acestea, rutele alternative sunt deja atacate. Separatiștii sponsorizați de SUA, care operează în provincia Baluchistan, în sud-vestul Pakistanului, atacă și ucid în mod regulat inginerii chinezi și distrug infrastructura. [...] Atacurile continuate ale Washingtonului asupra BRI, construcția militară condusă de americani de-a lungul coastelor Chinei și războiul propagandistic pe care SUA îl duc împotriva chinezilor, reprezintă o cursă contra cronometru atât pentru Washington, cât și pentru Beijing. Casa Albă încearcă să creeze condițiile în care previziunile RAND, despre devastarea economică a Chinei în urma unui conflict convențional limitat în Asia de Est, pot fi transformate în realitate. Pentru regimul lui Xi Jinping câștigarea timpului și eludarea disputelor devin vitale pentru reușita transformării unei puteri economice, militare și politice de care are nevoie pentru a descuraja pe deplin orice astfel de conflict și pentru a-și asuma poziția de cea mai mare și mai puternică economie de pe Pământ.

Is the Tide Finally Starting to Turn on Covid as an American Biowarfare Attack? / Just a couple of days ago, an influential MAGA/Trumpist website called The Conservative Treehouse published a 1,400 word piece strongly suggesting that America’s “Fourth Branch of Government,” namely our intelligence services, were quite possibly responsible for the Covid epidemic, and even concurring with me that former Secretary of State and CIA Director Mike Pompeo seems the individual most likely to know who was really responsible. >> Did The Fourth Branch of Government Release SARS-CoV-2 Then Blame China <<  The motives suggested are somewhat different from my own, with the alleged goal being to help ensure Trump’s defeat for reelection, and other details are also at variance with my analysis. But these are secondary matters of little importance compared to general agreement on the overriding question of “Who Did It?” and I have anyway never claimed much certainty in my speculations about “Why?”

Sitrep: China. Is. Dead. Serious. / China will not be conquered again, even if every last Chinese has to join the fight. In the past four days, China has sent first 28, then 29 fighters and bombers near Taiwan. (Taiwan itself reports different numbers). Then, the US announced on Sunday that this is provocative. So, China called the statement irresponsible and sent a massive number of 59 fighters and bombers near Taiwan in a ‘take that!’ move.  https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202110/1235639.shtml  [...]  Currently China is not threatening, she is using her air force to deliver very strong warnings that the conditions are approaching red lines.

Escalation? Continuation of “Sitrep : China. Is. Dead. Serious.” / If you think a war against China (and Russia – we have to call in Russia at this stage) will be a perpetual war, kindly think again. This is not a win or a lose – it is total destruction of the one that fires the first shot or shoots the first missile or positions the first submarine to destabilize sea-lanes. This represents the average Chinese and their chat and it is not the type of barroom soldier chat. These are ordinary people. China is a merit nation and very serious. One can expect precision and ruthlessness. You may want to believe that the Chinese are not born warriors or you may want to believe that they cannot innovate. You can believe what you want, but take a look at these comments: They do not believe in surgical strikes should anyone attack them. They believe in pounding the source of the attack and whatever is around it, into oblivion. They have their own history as a template. Btw, does this remind you of the Russians, who said that any strike on Russia will not only take out the strike, but also the platform where the strike comes from? The interaction between Russia and China militarily has grown tremendously as well, but again, this is another analysis. I expect full-on military readiness as the Chinese military has been on a readiness footing for about a year now. [...] Can we hope for level heads in Washington DC? Realism tells us that we have to hope for the best, but prepare for the worst. China is doing that.

Global Business Network - The Finale / As you know, Lombardy was heavily promoted as the epicenter of Covid in Italy when this hoax started in spring last year, but has miraculously disappeared from the media since then. Lombardy is the wealthiest region in Italy and its historical financial center. The biggest government party in Italy since 2018 has been the Five Star Movement. Its former leader (and current guarantor) Beppe Grillo was seen wearing a protective mask on two occasions on 17  December  2019. 14, 15  Although his statement that he used the mask to protect himself from "germs and viruses" that could come from journalists' microphones could be read as a form of provocation towards the media, it was clearly a signal to those in the know that the psyop was about to get started. 16 This is important because when you see who is behind and in the front of the Movement it makes total sense.

Beirut Sniper Identified as Employee of US Embassy / In a post on his twitter account on Friday, Hosein Mortada released a photo of Shukri Abu Saab, a member of the Lebanese security forces and a US embassy employee, and stated he had been one of the snipers involved in the recent deaths in Beirut, presstv reported. On Thursday, at least seven people were killed and 60 others injured after unknown gunmen attacked Hezbollah and Amal supporters as they passed through Beirut’s Teyouneh traffic circle dividing Christian and Shia Muslim neighborhoods. The demonstrators had taken to the streets of Lebanese capital to protest against the politicization of a judicial investigation into the 2020 port blast that devastated swathes of Beirut and left over 200 people dead. The violence was the worst in more than a decade and stirred memories of Lebanon's ruinous 1975-90 civil war.

andrew’s most important thesis, contra whitney webb & james corbett, is that china is opposed to the one world government ‘globalist’ plan / This is a monumental shift in world history. And yet there is effectively no one talking about it in any objective or rational manner. The importance of China is continually overstated or understated, depending on the context, and while both right and left in America support antagonizing and threatening China, no one has an explanation of why that is not nonsensical. Meanwhile, we have full documentation of why: there is a program to create a centralized global government, and China is refusing to cooperate with it, and therefore the entire thrust of the West is towards attacking China. Perhaps most importantly, the irresponsible and entitled population of the West cannot imagine their behavior could ever have consequences, and so there is zero reflection on what exactly it means when Joe Biden says that he is fully committed to the defense of Taiwanese independence. [...] The Western world is destroying its own population and basic social, political, and economic order, and effectively handing over control of the world to the Chinese. This seems confusing, but it actually isn’t that confusing. Rather, it should not be confusing, but it is, due to the amount of nonsense which abounds in our current cultural landscape. The plan in the decades-old playbook for the establishment of a one world totalitarian government was for China to “democratize” following the collapse of the USSR and the economic development provided to them by their entry into the World Trade Organization in 1999. It had been generally assumed that the economic and political elite of China would get on board with the UN agenda, and that China would become a member of the “international community” in the way that most of the former communist states did in the 1990s. According to the plan, laid down by a cartel of economic and intellectual elites, when every country’s government was on board with this “New World Order” agenda, the elite could then move to use false crises, such as the coronavirus and global warming hoaxes, to centralize tyrannical power, break down national borders, and eliminate the middle classes. This would then leave only an elite minority and a massive global peasantry, with a small body of a few million technocrat “managers” acting as enforcers of the elite agenda. This managerial class was called “Davos Man” and “gold collar workers” by Samuel P Huntington in his 2004 essay Dead Souls: The Denationalization of the American Elite. Huntington, a member of the World Economic Forum and a Harvard professor, stood among Henry Kissinger, George Soros, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Klaus Schwab, Carol Quigley, Alexander King and David Rockefeller as one of the primary 20th century planners of the geopolitical side of this New World Order system. (Note that all of those men listed are good people to read up on if you want to grasp how my predictions about the direction of this coronavirus hoax have been so accurate.)

Assessing the Russian counter propaganda efforts (Saker rant) / What I tried to show in these articles that, in total contrast from acting like the bad old Soviet propaganda, the modern Russian counter-propaganda does the exact opposite of what most people in the West believe it does: far from suppressing western propaganda, the Kremlin tries its very best to make sure that as many Russians as possible become aware of what the West is saying about them, their country and their values. The Kremlin even  PAYS anti-Russian pundits to go on Russian national TV!!!  Why?  Simply, because considering the nature of what the western media outlets, and even entire specialized entities, write and say about Russia, the best thing the Kremlin can do is to make darn sure that everybody in Russia becomes aware of it. [...]  My personal guess? That the Presidential Administration and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs are STILL full of those whom I refer to as “Atlantic Integrationists” (as opposed to the “Eurasian Sovereignists”), a reality which some Kremlin mouthpieces have been denying for quite a while now, but whose “fingerprints” I see all over the total mess (and many other “inexplicable” or otherwise contradictory Russian policies). Of sure, the Atlantic Integrationists are now keeping a low profile or pretending to be patriots, Putin has very effectively weakened them, I would even say defeated them, but only on the internal Russian ideological battlefield. But they have kept their positions and titles and are quietly continuing their sabotage, whether for money from the western alphabet soup or because they want to prove themselves to their western masters. If my guess is correct, then this is not a counter-propaganda issue, but a national security one!

The Iran-Azerbaijan standoff is a contest for the region’s transportation corridors / Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei pointedly tweeted that “those who are under the illusion of relying on others, think that they can provide their own security, should know that they will soon take a slap, they will regret this.” The message was unmistakable: this was about Azerbaijan relying on Turkey and especially Israel for its security, and about Tel Aviv instrumentalizing Baku for an intel drive leading to interference in northern Iran. Further elaboration by Iranian experts went as far as Israel eventually using military bases in Azerbaijan to strike at Iranian nuclear installations.

Iran Deploys Tanks, Armor, Artillery to Azerbaijan Border; Turkey Deploys its army in Azerbaijan / Iran is massing troops, artillery and armor along its northwestern border with Azerbaijan; and now Turkey is sending troops into Azerbaijan to confront Iran if a war breaks out. It is thus clear that an actual fight is brewing between Iran and Azerbaijan which, thanks to Turkey deploying its army, would automatically include war with Turkey. The motive behind all this is . . . . Israel versus Iran. Israel wants to harm Iran and prevent Iran from developing nuclear technology.   In order to develop that technology, Iran needs money from trade. So Israel is doing what it can to adversely affect Iranian trade. Last year, when Azerbaijan launched a brief war against Armenia to take (back) land, Israel figured prominently in its support of Azerbaijan. Israel supplied drones, other weaponry, technology, and intelligence information. Armenia lost.  Badly. Armenia got no help from Christian America, but they did get help from Christian Russia. This whole war debacle stuck in the craw of the US because its "ally" Israel was stirring things up. It also stuck in the craw of Christians worldwide because Israel (the self-described Jewish nation) was siding against Armenia which is the oldest Christian nation on earth, and was doing so in support of Azerbaijan which is Sunni Muslim. In addition, Israel recently began using Azerbaijan bases to launch drone strikes and missiles into Iran. Story HERE

Why's The US Set Its Regime Change Sights On NATO Partner Georgia? / There are two compelling reasons why the US is increasingly unhappy with the ruling Georgian Dream party. These are its close connectivity ties with China and Turkey through the pivotal role that Georgia nowadays plays for their Middle Corridor and its reluctance to further escalate tensions with Russia. [...]  As for the second reason, the US expected Georgia to do more to “contain” Russia. This includes carrying out Ukrainian-like border provocations against it as well as cutting off Russian-Armenian trade that transits through its territory. The ruling party hasn't done so since it wisely understands how counterproductive that would be for their objective national interests. The US, however, demands full obedience to its demands and doesn't tolerate any dissent from its vassals. The Georgian Dream's pragmatic reluctance to totally surrender their national sovereignty to the US like nearby Ukraine has done made American policymakers very angry. They therefore sent Saakashvili there in order to ramp up pressure on them on so-called “democratic” pretexts.  What can be learned from this incident is that the US is becoming increasingly strict with imposing its will on so-called “allies” in the contemporary New Cold War context. It wants to simultaneously pressure them to economically disengage with China in parallel with provoking Russia wherever these dual policies are applicable like in Georgia. It'll backstab its partners without thinking twice because of its radical zero-sum outlook on International Relations. The US hopes to continue fueling Color Revolution tensions inside those countries that don't fully comply with its demands until it either succeeds in enforcing its will, provoking civil war, or overthrowing the government.

Who Was Killed in Abbottabad in May 2011? Osama bin Laden or Someone Else? Pentagon Ordered Purge of Osama “Death Files” from Data Bank / This article was first published in July 2013 following the Pentagon’s Decision to Purge the bin Laden “death files” from the Pentagon’s data bank. The decision was justified “to protect the names of the personnel involved in the raid, according to the inspector general’s draft report.” The personnel involved were members of the Navy SEAL team 6 operative which undertook the bin Laden Abbottabad raids in May 2011. In a bitter irony, three months after Obama had officially announced that the SEAL 6 unit had killed Obama bin Laden, 22 NAVY Seal belonging to the same unit as the Navy SEALS involved in the Osama Abbotabad operation, died mysteriously in a helicopter crash in Afghanistan. [...] The chronology is important: the Pentagon decided to purge the Osama “death files”, two months after the families of the victims of the helicopter crash went public in May 2013 “with concerns that the Obama administration was at least partially responsible for the deaths of their sons” (Ibid). Erasing the names of the Navy SEAL Team 6 personnel from the Pentagon “death files”made it impossible to verify whether the Navy SEAL personnel involved in Abbottabad raid were dead or alive.