08 februarie 2020

Aceeaşi schemă ca şi la Băsescu - după ce ia puterea, atacă propria bază "social-politică" (electorală)


Chiar şi "Schema Dragnea", aş zice, deşi a fost puţin diferită iar acolo protagonistul a oscilat, n-a mers ferm pe scenariul prestabilit.

"Tonţii lui Trump", adică. Unul dintre ei (după trezire) a scris articolul de la  Occidental Dissent:


Trump’s Chumps

I voted for Donald Trump in the 2016 election.
I spent months making the case for Trump on this website. I will be the first to admit that I was wrong and that those who were skeptical of Trump in our community were right in 2016. In that election, I drank the koolaid and was one of Trump’s Chumps. Unlike AmNats, I have tried to learn something from that experience. I hate getting fooled by Republicans.
In 2020, we have a far better sense of Donald Trump. The Trump administration has a record now. Donald Trump’s first term is mostly history. We can now look back with the benefit of hindsight and evaluate our standing after the last three years without being drunk on Trump koolaid. No one drank the Trump koolaid in our community more deeply than the AmNats. Some of them remained drunk on the Trump koolaid even after the 2018 midterms. A handful of his most faithful cheerleaders have never given up faith in their GOD EMPEROR and succumbed to reality.
What is the reality of the Trump presidency?
1.) Those who feared that the Trump administration would lull the conservative base into a false sense of complacency and put all the normies back to sleep were right. Donald Trump has told his base that they are “winning.” They wear Q shirts and “Trust The Plan” at his rallies. They are Making America Great Again simply by having a Republican in the White House. They are content to go on believing that even as illegal immigration DOUBLED in FY 2019 and became a far worse problem than it ever was under the Obama administration. As we saw after the assassination of Qasem Soleimani, they are also ready to swallow Trump’s war propaganda against Iran and believe anything their dear leader tells them. It was Julian Assange and Roger Stone who went to prison under Trump, not Hillary Clinton. Normies are content to have conservatism in power and are less willing to give us an audience with a Republican in the White House.
2.) Those who feared that the Trump administration would suck all of the energy out of the Alt-Right were right. In the final two years of the Obama administration (2015 and 2016), the Alt-Right was thriving on social media and was brimming with energy. Four years later, the country has only gotten worse, but the brand has been destroyed and all the energy it had back then as an online subculture has been sucked out of the room by Trump and channeled into pushing the standard conservative policy agenda. The movement has been in disarray and has been divided and demoralized ever since Trump won the 2016 election. The last few years have been terrible. As soon as Trump won the 2016 election, conservatives shifted their attention back to policing their right flank. They are far more successful at policing their right flank when they are in power.
3.) Those who rationalized voting for Donald Trump on the basis of immigration and changing demographics were proven wrong about that too. He has refurbished the George W. Bush era fence. Since he has been president, Donald Trump has built all of three new miles of fence, which is actually less than W. and Obama. He didn’t do anything about sanctuary cities or pass E-Verify. He has actually increased guest worker programs. There has been no cuts to legal immigration. Instead, Jared Kushner’s legal immigration plan only proposes to reconfigure the composition of it for big business so that more high skilled workers and fewer peons are imported from the Third World. Illegal immigration has remained steady and has surged past the worst highs of the Obama years. It has recently fallen back to 2015 levels after peaking in FY 2019. Trump has vowed to pass an amnesty to save DACA. The Muslim ban became an ineffective travel ban. The only area where he has had any real success is refugee resettlement, but overall the bottom line is that after four years of Trump there are millions of more illegal aliens and legal immigrants here. Donald Trump hasn’t even deported as many illegal aliens as Obama.
4.) Those who voted for Donald Trump to “move the Overton Window” succeeded in making homosexuality more acceptable on the Right. This was already clear by the time of the Deploraball at Trump’s inauguration. In the Trump era, homosexuals and drag queens would be accepted into the fold on the Right and White Nationalists would remain stigmatized. Congress has actually condemned White Nationalism at least two or three times since Donald Trump has been president. Far more White Nationalists have gone to prison under Donald Trump than Barack Obama. Trump has appointed “conservative judges” like Thomas Cullen who put RAM in prison. Some of Trump’s Chumps point to Bernie Sanders vowing to “declare war” on White Nationalism after the El Paso shooting. They conveniently forget the fact that National Review and conservatives ALSO declared war on White Nationalism last August. We’ve been covering the government crackdown which has been going on since last August.
AmNats have been purged from Turning Point USA, banned from its events and reduced to haranguing Ben Shapiro and Charlie Kirk from the sidewalk. They have been banned from even attending CPAC. Those who thought that they could work within the system to reform conservatism were grossly mistaken. Steve King was condemned by Congress, stripped of his committee assignments and has been treated as a pariah within the Republican Party. Michelle Malkin was deplatformed by Mar-a-Lago and excommunicated from the synagogue of mainstream conservatism. Ann Coulter was marginalized in the Trump administration. Jeff Sessions and Steve Bannon were both fired. Donald Trump hired conservatives and staffed his administration with his enemies. While I won’t name any names, I will just point to all the people who actually worked within the conservative movement who have all been purged and fired in the Trump era by Conservatism, Inc. as proof that working within the system doesn’t work and is a bad idea and those people would have had more job security doing almost anything else.
5.) What about Antifa and Big Tech censorship? Aren’t those good reasons to vote for Donald Trump in 2020? Neither of these issues were on our radar screen BEFORE Donald Trump won the 2016 election. Both of those problems became dramatically worse as a result of electing the boogeyman as president. Far from being a victory for the Dissident Right, we became identified with Donald Trump and were caught in the backlash while he delivered Jeb Bush’s agenda (the boogeyman wasn’t real). Before Trump was elected president, Antifa was a tiny nuisance that protested Amren conferences and there was still a great deal of free speech on the internet. We could also hold rallies all over the South without serial harassment from these people. Now, everything from harassment and doxxing by “journalists” to chronic Antifa violence to police stand down orders to deplatforming to FBI counterextremism witch hunts has became part of the scenery of life under the Trump administration which is only interested in these new grievances insofar as they can be milked and exploited to elect more Republicans. In hindsight, it would have been better NOT to have identified ourselves with the boogeyman in 2016.
6.) Isn’t having Donald Trump in the White House a huge victory for “identitarianism” and big ideas like “nationalism” and “populism.” President Donald Trump’s signature policy victories have been passing a huge corporate tax cut, criminal justice reform and renegotiating and rebranding NAFTA. Trump is a “populist” in the sense that he has DEEPENED neoliberalism. When you look at his policies, he has continued and further extended the status quo of the last forty years which has been tax cuts, deregulation, entitlement cuts, free trade agreements and huge increases in military spending. Trump’s economic agenda has been no different from the last three Republican presidents. He has been all bark and no bite.
Donald Trump is pointedly NOT a nationalist, populist or identitarian. He carefully avoids ever mentioning the word “White.” Instead, he talks incessantly about the black, Hispanic, Asian-American, LGBTQ and female unemployment rate. He holds events at the White House for blacks and Hispanics. He delivers policies for blacks and Hispanics too like criminal justice reform. The “forgotten man” couldn’t be further from Donald Trump’s mind when he is schmoozing with the likes of Steve Schwarzman and boasting about the stock market. Trump is a demagogue who recognized that nationalist and populist sentiments were growing in the American electorate and he has harnessed and manipulated and exploited those forces for his donors.
7.) Speaking of Trump’s donors, we wrote Trump a blank check in the 2016 election to deliver on the MAGA agenda that he had sold us. We voted for big ideas like “nationalism” and “populism.” The reasons why I voted for Donald Trump in 2016 were immigration, trade, foreign policy, political correctness and campaign finance and furthering these big ideas of “nationalism” and “populism.” He has been a disappointment on all fronts.
Those of us who were duped into believing that Donald Trump had a team of Jews who were going to craft all of these policies which were going to stabilize America’s demographics should reflect on what has actually happened during the Trump presidency. Orthodox Jews hit the jackpot with the King of Israel and Zionists have been on an unprecedented winning streak. In just the last three months, Trump has issued an executive order to ban anti-Semitism on college campuses, assassinated Qasem Soleimani and has given Bibi Netanyahu the green light to annex large swathes of the West Bank. Trump is even considering allowing Jonathan Pollard to return to Israel. Is it any wonder then that a recent Gallup poll found that Israelis support his “America First” foreign policy over Americans by a whopping 18-point margin?
Trump’s Chumps haven’t been deterred by any of this. They want us to write Donald Trump a second political blank check in 2020, which his Jewish donors intend to cash at the White House, only this time he won’t be restrained by fear of losing his reelection. In light of everything he has delivered for them so far, what is Donald Trump going to do in his second term for his Jewish donors who fund the GOP? Do we trust Trump not to start a war with Iran?
8.) In the last two elections, Donald Trump has pulled a bait-and-switch and Trump’s Chumps are gullible enough to fall for it a third time. While I was wrong about the 2016 election, I was one of the first voices in our community to wise up to what was going on. By the 2018 midterms, I saw the bait-and-switch coming and warned our readers about it.
As you might recall, the 2018 midterms were about tax cuts and the roaring economy, deregulation and putting Gorsuch and Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court. It was also full of dire warnings about scary Antifa groups, Big Tech censorship and caravans from Central America to stir up the base. Trump vowed to issue an executive order to end birthright citizenship. The GOP knows what its base cares about and shamelessly manipulates its base during election season.
After the 2018 election was over, you might recall how Trump banned bump stocks and passed criminal justice reform for Van Jones and the Koch Brothers during the lame duck session of Congress. As we entered 2019, the Republican agenda changed to overthrowing the government of Venezuela to install Juan Guaidó in power and passing anti-BDS legislation. The GOP spent the whole year accusing the Democrats of anti-Semitism and promoting Jexodus. Virtually nothing else was talked about for a whole year in Congress but anti-Semitism until Trump issued his executive order on anti-Semitism on college campuses after the House and Senate had failed to reach agreement on anti-BDS legislation. The White House held its Social Media Summit in July and nothing came out of it. Antifa disappeared from the agenda and was replaced by a government crackdown on White Nationalists after El Paso. Ending birthright citizenship was forgotten about. Illegal immigration soared to its highest level in over a decade last May.
Don’t forget how Trump’s Chumps told us how “Chad” it was in 2018 to elect more Republicans to stop Antifa, the caravans and Big Tech censorship and how those same Republicans once elected to office preferred to fight anti-Semitism for AIPAC.
9.) In the last election, Trump’s Chumps were manipulated into splintering their own movement by GOP operatives who divided and conquered and data mined the Dissident Right. When Ricky Vaughn was exposed as a Republican operative named Douglass Mackey who was scraping Paul Nehlen’s Facebook in order to feed the information into the Smartcheckr database, Trump’s Chumps loudly denounced Nehlen for doxxing Vaughn. Strangely, they had nothing to say when Smartcheckr which became Clearview AI sold that database and its facial recognition tool to the FBI and hundreds of other law enforcement agencies.


10.) Trump’s Chumps have demonstrated in the last two election cycles how easy they are to manipulate. They can be relied on to vote and shill for the GOP no matter what it does. Donald Trump isn’t under any pressure from these people to change. He knows his mark better than they know themselves. They are so desperate for acceptance and to participate in elections and to feel like they are “winning” that they will delude themselves like the rest of his cult into believing almost anything. Give a drowning man enough rope and he will hang himself.
Four years later, Trump’s Chumps are still sitting by the phone waiting for the Donald to call back while he huddles with Steve Schwarzman and Bibi Netanyahu. They can’t see what is front of their own eyes. By going ALL IN for Trump, they wrecked, divided and demoralized their own movement in order to advance the standard conservative policy agenda. They have been pushed off the internet and in some cases even to the dark web. In virtually every way, they are worse off than they were four years ago and have nothing to show for it. Insofar as they are getting more web traffic, it is because America has only continued to deteriorate under Trump, which would have happened anyway regardless who won in 2016.
It’s not too late for Trump’s Chumps to reclaim one thing that they have lost over the past four years. They can still reclaim their self respect. They don’t have to participate in this charade a second time and mislead people who are less informed because they now know full well that Sheldon Adelson has bought Donald Trump and the lickspittle GOP Congress.


Note: Imagine thinking a New York City billionaire is a “populist.” LMAO what were we thinking? He told us what we wanted to hear and we believed it

14 comentarii :

Riddick spunea...

Dragnea a făcut multe bune, dar a greşit că n-a urnit şi partidul "pe direcţia aia". Era doar un grup care vorbea la televizor, dar la partid tot şobolănimea dirija treaba. Desigur, în direcţia contrară. În 2015 îi ameninţa pe cei doar 12 parlamentari PSD care nu l-au votat la învestire pe Cioloş (cum era ordinul extern) că "vor avea probleme în partid". Abia de prin toamna 2016 i s-a creat "legenda" de naţionalist. Unde-i "Grupul Dragnea din PSD"? Olguţa? Soţul, C. Manda este cu Ciolacu, deci şi ea, care-l declara "prieten" pe Paul Stănescu, "ciolacist". Şi apropo, averea i-au lăsat-o în pace (lui Dragnea) şi-i vor da drumul chiar anul ăsta, dar după anticipate. Pe "vicii de procedură".

***

Avertisment timpuriu (aprilie 2017) în privinţa lui Trump ("he was just another deep state/Neo-Con puppet").

Video (acum nevizionabil, "privat"): 'What's on the menu?' There's no draining of any Swamp. There's a lot of talk about but there's nothing really going on with that. When is it gonna occur? I'm just curious. When is it gonna happen? It's ridiculous to think that's gonna occur. It's not. Because you're not gonna have Swamp monsters in your own Administration talking about draining the Swamp when those Swamp monsters were either involved or involved in the covering up of certain 'cataclysmic events' that occured back in the day. You know what I mean? I just don't see it.

There is something undeniably dysfunctional going on with the Trump presidency
Khazarian mafia attempts to start World War 3 stopped in Syria and in North Korea
Now that Donald Trump showed his true colours as a Zionist (Khazarian mafia) sleeper agent, he is becoming increasingly isolated and is guilty of provable war crimes, Pentagon, CIA and other sources agree. “Trump is toast,” was how a CIA source described the situation.
Trump has been pushed by his Zionist handlers into trying to start World War 3 because these religious fanatics still think they are somehow going to start a war between “Gog” and “Magog,” kill 90% of humanity and enslave the rest. To this end Trump ordered an attack on a Syrian airbase where Russian personnel were stationed. That is also why Trump tried to start a war with nuclear armed North Korea last week.

If Trump is the best that patriots think they have, they’re in deep trouble
Sure, it made some kind of sense to strategically vote Trump/Republican, to prevent Hillary, but there was never any legitimate reason for the hype and the fairy tales. Right after the election conservative media figures could have dropped the hype and just demanded that Trump either delivers leadership and action, or pack up and go home. Instead, creatures like Alex Jones kept overhyping and making excuses, and thus tied part of their their fate to Trump. Many patriots have wasted valuable time and now sound absolutely desperate when they cling to their fantasy of Trump and imagine some sort of mass arrest of “left deep state” figures or some great action of the Marine Corps to protect the president against a leftist “coup”.

Zece minciuni majore ale lui Trump: "TRUMP LIED!"

Video ("Why I left The Movement"): The Deep State isn't 'running scared'. Sorry. This is Fantasyland.

Riddick spunea...

Pasaje importante din articol:

Those who feared that the Trump administration would suck all of the energy out of the Alt-Right were right. In the final two years of the Obama administration (2015 and 2016), the Alt-Right was thriving on social media and was brimming with energy. Four years later, the country has only gotten worse, but the brand has been destroyed and all the energy it had back then as an online subculture has been sucked out of the room by Trump and channeled into pushing the standard conservative policy agenda. The movement has been in disarray and has been divided and demoralized ever since Trump won the 2016 election. The last few years have been terrible. As soon as Trump won the 2016 election, conservatives shifted their attention back to policing their right flank. They are far more successful at policing their right flank when they are in power.

In the Trump era, homosexuals and drag queens would be accepted into the fold on the Right and White Nationalists would remain stigmatized. Congress has actually condemned White Nationalism at least two or three times since Donald Trump has been president. Far more White Nationalists have gone to prison under Donald Trump than Barack Obama. Trump has appointed “conservative judges” like Thomas Cullen who put RAM in prison. Some of Trump’s Chumps point to Bernie Sanders vowing to “declare war” on White Nationalism after the El Paso shooting. They conveniently forget the fact that National Review and conservatives ALSO declared war on White Nationalism last August. We’ve been covering the government crackdown which has been going on since last August.

What about Antifa and Big Tech censorship? Aren’t those good reasons to vote for Donald Trump in 2020? Neither of these issues were on our radar screen BEFORE Donald Trump won the 2016 election. Both of those problems became dramatically worse as a result of electing the boogeyman as president. Far from being a victory for the Dissident Right, we became identified with Donald Trump and were caught in the backlash while he delivered Jeb Bush’s agenda (the boogeyman wasn’t real). Before Trump was elected president, Antifa was a tiny nuisance that protested Amren conferences and there was still a great deal of free speech on the internet. We could also hold rallies all over the South without serial harassment from these people. Now, everything from harassment and doxxing by “journalists” to chronic Antifa violence to police stand down orders to deplatforming to FBI counterextremism witch hunts has became part of the scenery of life under the Trump administration which is only interested in these new grievances insofar as they can be milked and exploited to elect more Republicans. In hindsight, it would have been better NOT to have identified ourselves with the boogeyman in 2016.

Isn’t having Donald Trump in the White House a huge victory for “identitarianism” and big ideas like “nationalism” and “populism.” President Donald Trump’s signature policy victories have been passing a huge corporate tax cut, criminal justice reform and renegotiating and rebranding NAFTA. Trump is a “populist” in the sense that he has DEEPENED neoliberalism. When you look at his policies, he has continued and further extended the status quo of the last forty years which has been tax cuts, deregulation, entitlement cuts, free trade agreements and huge increases in military spending. Trump’s economic agenda has been no different from the last three Republican presidents. He has been all bark and no bite.

Riddick spunea...

Donald Trump is pointedly NOT a nationalist, populist or identitarian. He carefully avoids ever mentioning the word “White.” Instead, he talks incessantly about the black, Hispanic, Asian-American, LGBTQ and female unemployment rate. He holds events at the White House for blacks and Hispanics. He delivers policies for blacks and Hispanics too like criminal justice reform. The “forgotten man” couldn’t be further from Donald Trump’s mind when he is schmoozing with the likes of Steve Schwarzman and boasting about the stock market. Trump is a demagogue who recognized that nationalist and populist sentiments were growing in the American electorate and he has harnessed and manipulated and exploited those forces for his donors.

Anonim spunea...

Era asa mare lucru sa fi dat si traducerea ca sa nu ma mai amarasc eu s-o fac pentru a reusii sa pricep ceva , ceva ? In Ferentari nu se prea vorbeste engleza pentru cazul in care nu stiai !

Riddick spunea...

O să mai "bag" traduceri, dar momentan... sunt cam încărcat.

conumishu spunea...

Cam multe chestii, prea multe ca să pot rumega fără să pierd cîteva zile la ele.

Nu prea sînt de acord, după cum cred că știi deja.

Am să mă leg de punctul 6, singurul căruia i-am acordat ceva timp de gîndire și care venea pe un teren pregătit, pentru că mă interesează aspectele de la granița economic-administrativ-național-identitar.

Întîi, americanii, destui, greșesc fundamental. Nu există o națiune albă, există o națiune americană, dacă există una. Etnic sunt prea pestriți, dar lingvistic, cultural și spiritual sunt creștini anglo-saxoni aparținînd culturii europene cu rădăcini greco-latine.

Absolut toate aceste elemente care pot să-i unifice sunt atacate prin bomba rasială cu efect întîrziat (și garantat). Singurii cu adevărat asimilați lingvistic și cultural sunt negrii. Singura alianță care poate asigura continuitatea în timp e cea dintre albi și negri. Metisajul rasial nu pare nici realizabil nici de dorit, dar cultural negrii au adoptat cultura engleză (ca să simplific), ce să-ți dorești mai mult? Rapism-ul e un jeg destinat să radă cultural tot, și la negri și la albi, nu ține de culoarea pielii sau de delicvență, ține de subminarea în plan cultural.

Descendenții europenilor albi, de frică, cred, să nu ofenseze nostalgii etno-identitare au impresia că alb ține loc de englez. Nu. Engleza, atît ca limbă vorbită, cît și ca vector al literaturii și, în sens mai larg, culturii de expresie anglo-saxonă a triumfat. Hollywoodul scoate în față mafii italiene, gălăgii grecești, închistări poloneze și tot felul de aluzii, de obicei greșite, etnice. Doar ca să promoveze, mereu și mereu, un singur trib, care se simte mai bine dacă în jurul său are alte triburi,
(re)inventate, nu o națiune tot mai omogenă, cum ar fi inevitabil.

Trump nu are de ce să promoveze albismul. Nici electoral, realmente e posibil să cîștige cîteva state prin simplul transfer a vreo 5% din voturile negrilor de la candidatul democrat către el, nici ca strategie pe termen lung. Cei mai prolifici albi sunt și cei mai puțin tipici majorității creștin-anglo-saxone, anume mormonii sau fanaticii așa-zis evangheliști, de fapt un fel de sectă a iudaismului.

Eu îi urmăresc discursurile cu mare atenție, mesajul e același, nu e diversionist. Că există o distanță între vorbă și faptă, de acord, dar uneori nu îmi e prea clar cam cum trebuie să arate fapta, multe sunt prea complicat legate între ele ca să o iei abrupt.

conumishu spunea...

(partea a 2-a)

În nici într-un caz acordurile de liber schimb marca Trump nu sunt mai rele pentru SUA, favorabile pentru bogații SUA întîi și întîi, dar asta era culmea, pentru cine altcineva? Dar protecționismul abia mascat a început să existe, vituperat cînd se întîmplă la alții, exaltat ca măsură în favoarea blue collars cînd e american. Sigur, nu e întîi pentru muncitori, dar e și pentru ei. Care muncitori, că era mai simplu în epoca industrială, știa cine e cine și că rămîne așa toată viața activă? Trump înțelege treaba asta, alții nu prea, nici măcar sau mai ales un Bernie Sanders, un Iliescu tipic, dar mult mai superficial.

Trump s-a frecat de stăpînii reali, a prins învățăminte. Poate e dirijat, poate nu, nu din cei 3 ani de pînă acum se poate desprinde cu claritate concluzia.

Tonul textului îl cunosc, de ani de zile. Epoca respectivă s-a dus, încă din anii 50-60. Turner's diaries, pentru cine a vrut s-o înțeleagă, era o carte antisistem, nu una pro-albism, dar și aia e depășită, tehnologia ne obligă să ținem pasul și să ne ajustăm din mers strategia.

Trump s-ar putea să nu livreze mare lucru, dar Trump spune multe care trebuiau spuse, iar cînd le spunea oricine altcineva era desființat. Acum vine el în baia de mulțime și nu ratează niciodată momentul în care îi arată cu degetul pe fakenewseri și îi etichetează drept cel mai mare dușman al americanului de rînd. Nici Eisenhower nu a fost un prunc, și el a servit molohul, dar la bătrînețe, ca președinte, a făcut și bine. La fel, și Trump își are și propria personalitate, nu doar o sumă de vicii, ca Clinton, sau gîndire algoritmic interesată, ca Obama, doi tipi inteligenți absolut controlați de sistem. Trump nu pare așa.

Nu trebuie să fim de acord, dar nu cred că există o schemă prin care să se identifice cu atît de mare siguranță cum apare din verdictele articolului puritatea, să-i zicem, doctrinară a cuiva. America reală e, la fel ca România reală, defectată dincolo de punctul în care s-ar putea reveni la ce a fost cu 50 de ani în urmă. Trebuie croit ceva cu materialul rămas bun și cu peticire de calitate, ca să mă exprim așa. Trump nu are nici măcar parte de un consens interesat al unor profitori inteligenți care să poată înțelege că e envoie de o ajustare și a lor, a apucăturilor lor. Manipulatorii ajung să creadă că orice poate fi manipulat, oricînd. Eu cred că Trump și alții care l-au identificat, pescuit, lansat, cu participarea lui, au înțeles limitele jocului de pînă acum și că e nevoie, fie și temporar, de onestitate în mesajul către popor.

Uneori încerc un experiment mental, să încerc să văd cum aș proceda dacă aș avea pîrghii la dispoziție și mă îngrozesc de căt de încurcate sunt consecințele previzibile. Dar alea cu care trezești cînd credeai că ai suflat și în iaurt!

Practic, în arena internațională și făcînd abstracție de urticaria pe care mi-o provoacă flegmele lui față-de-piftie, Trump a produs cel mai puțin rău americănesc din ultimii 30 de ani. Nu e chiar puțin. Ar trebui întrebați cei mai direct vizați de acțiunea prezidențială clintonisto-bushisto-obamistă, sîrbi, irakieni, afgani, libieni, sirieni, ucrainieni, dacă domnia lui Trump se compară cu a respectivilor la răul făcut. Cum nu am de unde să știu ce se pune, concret, la cale, mă mulțumesc cu ceva ce nu prea am văzut în viața mea adultă dinspre un mandat de președinte SUA. Poate am îmbătrînit.

Riddick spunea...

Mi-ar fi plăcut să văd că Trump "livrează", şi nu recurge la justificări şi amânări, ori de-a dreptul ocoleşte anumite teme. Desigur, nu are partidul ("GOP") de partea lui, dar măcar colaboratorii depind de el, şi sunt cam mulţi neoconi pe acolo. Nu am prejudecăţi sau "fixaţii negative" vizavi de el, doar remarc că nu merge bine treaba.

De acord, nu trebuie antagonizaţi negrii. Dar şi ei (negrii) să-şi dea seama că au fost până acum instrumentalizaţi de unii care nu le doreau tocmai binele.

Problema cea mare rămâne însă faptul că "n-are (în mod real...) partid". Cam ca şi Dragnea, care începuse să facă ceva dar până la "executanţi" nu mai ajungea mesajul. Până la urmă, mai mult mă interesează interacţiunea lui cu România şi cu UE - văd c-a făcut bine demiţându-l pe ambasadorul la UE Sondland, dar parcă "la început" se vorbea despre numirea unui conservator şi eurosceptic (Tomlinson?), nu acest colaborator în imobiliare pe care-l demite abia după ce "i-a muşcat mâna". Ce să mai zic despre "conservatorul" adus în locul lui Klemm?! Probabil mai multe, după parada gay din iunie când "o să mă uit după el" (la tv şi pe net, desigur).

Aproape sigur va lua al doilea mandat, şi abia atunci se va vedea "ce şi cum".

Riddick spunea...

Ted Malloch, nu "Tomlinson":

European parliament leaders call on EU to reject Trump's likely ambassador pick

Exclusive: Heads of parliament’s main political parties issue unprecedented call opposing Ted Malloch, who likened his goal to ‘bringing down the Soviet Union’

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/feb/02/european-union-trump-ambassador-ted-malloch-parliament

conumishu spunea...

Cred că ai văzut, în link-ul cristoiublog, pasajul

"Oficiali ai guvernului au fost îngrijorați de felul în care Gordon Sondland, deși ambasador SUA la Bruxelles, pe lângă Uniunea Europeană, căuta să obțină acces la Casa Albă pentru Ana Birchall, cunoscută ca opunându-se reformelor anti-corupție în justiție, dar și pentru alți oficiali români."

Ha, deci globalista Birchall, în viziunea unei goarne neocon, îngrijora consiliul de securitate cu Bolton la șefie pentru că... se opunea legilor anti-corupție și de aia e schimbat coruptul mijlocitor Sondland acum. Mișto. Dement, dar mișto. După mine arată că Trumpiștii vor să schimbe cîte ceva, dar sunt prea slabi pentru o confruntare deschisă. Pare tactica dinspre sfîrșitul anilor 50 de la noi. Se spuneau toate lozincile, erau lăudați eliberatorii, genialii, generoșii sovietici și îi răreau pe brukneri, desființau sovhozurile și trimiteau trupele sovietice acasă. Poate fi și o încercare de brambureală din partea taberei care are pierderi pe care vrea să le mascheze printr-o dezinformare confuză cu rol de descurajare. Plus multă prostie care crede că în jur are tot numai prostie. În orice caz, se joacă. Sodland ăsta nu s-a oferit voluntar în mascarada cu impeachmentul, l-am văzut puțin, îi era clar că va trece pe linie moartă și nu mai avea nimic de pierdut sau de ales.

Riddick spunea...

N-am văzut linkul, intru acum. Dar dac-au formulat aşa, atunci e foarte aproape de adevăr. Findcă Bitchall acţiona în cea mai înaltă formă de corupţie, adică trădarea.

Riddick spunea...

Am înţeles cu lipsa de forţă, măcar aşa să fie, asta să fie explicaţia "ambiguităţilor". Nu c-aş fi descoperit acum, o gândisem, dar nu prea îmi venea a crede. Fiindcă nu ieşi de sub "atenţia" inamicului aşa, însă îţi derutezi propria bază care nu mai ştie ce să creadă.

conumishu spunea...

Da, un mare adevăr: "îţi derutezi propria bază care nu mai ştie ce să creadă"

Erată pentru mai înainte: am scris sovhoz, mă gîndeam la sovrom-urile de jupuire a resurselor românești, corporațiile de azi, cum ar veni.

Riddick spunea...

Şi tot ca şi acum, atunci "ăilalţi" veneau cu nauhau-u' (know how-ul) iar noi cu resursele şi cu cârca, iar la urmă, "parte egală" sau "mai egală", ca-n Arendaşul român de Caragiale ("Nu, cocoane, dar cu prașila, drept și drept." / "Stai să-ţi dau eu ţie drept, măi Ioane.").


Citate din gândirea profundă a europeiştilor RO

Călin Popescu-Tăriceanu, 2008: "Vom da astăzi, în Parlamentul României, un vot istoric - votul pentru ratificarea Tratatului de reformă al Uniunii Europene. Pentru România este mai mult decât un moment festiv. Ratificarea Tratatului de reformă marchează o etapă. Spun acest lucru din două motive. Pe de o parte, este o primă etapă pe care noi am parcurs-o în cadrul Uniunii Europene, după aderarea de la 1 ianuarie 2007. Am avut şansa să contribuim la negocierea şi la construirea acestui Tratat, beneficiind de aceleaşi drepturi şi având aceleaşi obligaţii ca oricare altă ţară europeană. Este cel dintâi tratat european semnat de România, în calitate de stat membru al Uniunii Europene. Simbolic, este primul document al Europei extinse, negociat şi semnat în format UE 27. Pentru toate aceste motive, odată cu ratificarea de către Parlament, putem spune că este cel dintâi tratat european pe care România îşi pune efectiv amprenta, conform intereselor sale, nemaifiind în postura de a prelua ceea ce au negociat şi au decis alţii. Doamnelor şi domnilor senatori şi deputaţi, în urmă cu trei ani, prin votul dumneavoastră, România a ratificat Tratatul constituţional ["Constituţia UE", caducă], odată cu ratificarea Tratatului de aderare la Uniunea Europeană. Aşa cum ştiţi, Tratatul constituţional nu a putut intra în vigoare. Din fericire, aşa cum noi am susţinut în timpul negocierilor, inovaţiile din acest document au fost preluate în Tratatul de la Lisabona. Aceste inovaţii sunt un pas înainte faţă de tratatele europene în vigoare acum."

 

Postări populare: