Pe siteul Cryptome a apărut un articol care ridică ipoteza că Wikileaks ar beneficia de susţinere din partea unor organizaţii care sunt ale controversatului multimiliardar George Soros, cum ar fi Open Society Institute (articolul are titlul "George Soros Open Source Institute Inquiry on Wikileaks").
A writes:
I've been following coverage of Wikileaks' release of the Afghan Diaries closely, and have admired your skepticism. I feel firmly we are on the same page. However, I would like to make an attempt to clear some possible disinformation that is floating about. While it's obvious that the "diaries" are a mix of propaganda and publicly available information, I do suspect the entire operation is funded from a controlling interest.
Thank you for taking the time to read this far, and allow me to voice my concern. Many are running with the claim that Wikileaks was funded by The Open Society Institute. (Soros connection). I, myself, suspected the same, after Declan's CNET interview with you...
"Operating a Web site to post leaked documents isn't very expensive (Young estimates he spends a little over $100 a month for Cryptome's server space). So when other Wikileaks founders started to talk about the need to raise $5 million and complained that an initial round of publicity had affected "our delicate negotiations with the Open Society Institute and other funding bodies," Young says, he resigned from the effort."
However, judging by that article, it's just not clear to me, whether or not Open Society Institute, in fact, provided funding for Wikileaks.
You had a falling-out with the other Wikileaks founders?
Young: Yes. But it was over this: someone said that the initial goal was $5 million. That caught my attention. One, because I think the type of stuff I was going to publish, you should never do it for money. Only because that contaminates the credibility and it turns it into a business opportunity where there's great treachery and lying going on.
And it will contaminate Wikileaks. It always does. In fact, that's the principal means by which noble endeavors are contaminated, the money trail. That's pretty obvious. I happen to think that amateur stuff is better than paid stuff.
How long were you involved before you resigned?
Young: Not long. A few weeks. It wasn't long. However, one of the things that happened is that somehow I got subscribed to that list under another nym and the messages kept coming in. I got to keep reading what they were saying about me after they booted me off. The messages kept coming in. So I published those too.
Did they criticize you for, well, leaking about Wikileaks?
Young: They certainly did. They accused me of being an old fart and jealous. And all these things that come up, that typically happen when someone doesn't like you. That's okay. I know you would never do that and journalists never do that, but ordinary people do this all the time.
Cryptome request submitted 9 August 2010 to:- - - - - - -
http://www.soros.org/contact
Does the Open Society Institute or other initiatives financed by Mr. George Soros support Wikileaks.org, its staff, supporters or its affiliates, either directly or indirectly though other parties.
If financial or other support is provided could you describe it: extent, time frame, terms and conditions?
Your response will be published on the public education website Cryptome.org of which I am the administrator.
Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
John Young
Cryptome.org
251 West 89th Street
New York, NY 10024
212-873-8700
Response to inquiry submission:
Contact- - - - - - -
Thank you for contacting the Open Society Institute. Your message has been forwarded to the appropriate department for review.
We make every effort possible to respond to all inquiries—and in a timely fashion. However, due to the volume of email received, we cannot guarantee a response to every message.
General information about OSI and the Soros foundations network may be found in the About Us section of this website. Specific information about OSI programs and projects may be found in the Initiatives section.
Young a mai adresat şi următoarea solicitare către CIA:
And a related inquiry faxed to the CIA 9 August 2010:
http://www.foia.cia.gov/sample_request_letter.asp
9 August 2010
By mail and fax to: (703) 613-3007
Information and Privacy Coordinator
Central Intelligence Agency
Washington, D.C. 20505
Dear Coordinator:
Under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. subsection 552, I am requesting information or records on Wikileaks.org, Julian Assange and others unknown associated with Wikileaks and its affiliates.
Please supply the records without informing me of the cost if the fees do not exceed $1,000.00, which I agree to pay.
If you deny all or any part of this request, please cite each specific exemption you think justifies your refusal to release the information and notify me of appeal procedures available under the law.
Information or records provided by you will be published on the public education website Cryptome.org for which I am the administrator.
If you have any questions about handling this request, you may telephone me at (212) 873-8700.
Sincerely,
John Young
Cryptome.org
251 West 89th Street
New York, NY 10024
21 de comentarii :
Penibilul ala de Julien Assange a delcarat cu gura lui ca scopul ultim al wikileaks e sa modifice perceptia publicului in privinta chestiunilor politice.
Era clar ca omul e un socialist nenorocit dupa faza cu publicarea email-urile doamnei Palin.
Au o agendă - distrugerea dreptei în SUA, şi transformarea într-un stat socialist.
Au adresat un apel unii pt Obama în acest sens, caut link-ul.
Sa speram ca sunt cat mai multe incendii la Moscova....
Ard pădurile de pe la sfârşitul lui martie, cică. Acum s-a aflat.
Ce s-a intamplat cu NR???
Eram sigura ca a ceva mult mai grav cu padurile
Acum am văzut, fac săpături. No problem, o iau de la capăt, dacă e nevoie... ;-)
Cred că e vorba de Christopher Story, postarea din 10 iulie, dispărută de la worldreports.org (n-o puteau scoate decât el ori colaboratorii săi).
Caut să iau legatura cu WordPress. Până acum, nicio notificare, nimic.
Nu-mi vine sa cred !
Ultima oara cred ca m-am uitat acum vreo 1-1,5 ore pe NR
Me 2. Până dimineaţă fac altul, dacă e pe aşa.
Ultimele accesări (vizibile pe statcounter)la NewsReload:
magnify this user 9 Aug 21:02:15 Default Browser 0 unknown unknown United Kingdom Coventry,
United Kingdom Be Un Limited (94.193.52.13) [Label IP Address]
riddickro.wordpress.com/
No referring link
magnify this user 9 Aug 19:54:50 Firefox 3.5 WinVista unknown United States Augusta,
Georgia,
United States Comcast Cable (71.226.0.200) [Label IP Address]
riddickro.wordpress.com/?updated=blogspam
No referring link
magnify this user 9 Aug 19:54:30 Firefox 3.5 WinVista unknown United States Augusta,
Georgia,
United States Comcast Cable (71.226.0.200) [Label IP Address]
riddickro.wordpress.com/
No referring link
magnify this user 9 Aug 19:54:01 Firefox 3.5 WinVista unknown United States Augusta,
Georgia,
United States Comcast Cable (71.226.0.200) [Label IP Address]
riddickro.wordpress.com/
No referring link
magnify this user 9 Aug 19:52:49 Firefox 3.5 WinVista unknown United States Augusta,
Georgia,
United States Comcast Cable (71.226.0.200) [Label IP Address]
riddickro.wordpress.com/
No referring link
magnify this user 9 Aug 19:39:26 Firefox 3.6 WinVista unknown United States Tucson,
Arizona,
United States Cox Communications (70.190.102.136) [Label IP Address]
riddickro.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/1295/
Toate cu "no reffering link"... ;-)
Adica, era bookmark.
Nu stiu ce insemna exact "bookmark",in afara de semn de carte
Exact. link memorat în calculator, accesare cu un click.
L-am suparat tare pe unui din Tucson, Arizona, Cox Communications (provider), I.P. 70.190.102.136, are ZECI de accesări pe NewsReload în ultimele două ore.
Mai fusese inainte pe NR?
no ref. link- inseamna ca au adresa blogului intr-un calculator si acceseaza din cand in cand sa vada ce s-a mai postat pe blog - adica urmaresc aparitiile pe blog?-le copiaza?
Poti sa faci un blog nou-eventual nu mai posta tema din 10-7.
Tu nu vezi ce-ti fac?
E clar ca asta este cauza
Desigur, le-am trezit interesul...
Ba da, ba da, ba da! De-al dracului, să văd dacă chiar asta e cauza ! ;-)
Pur si simplu ai repostat niste articole indicand sursa, nu altceva.
Singura postare stearsa de cel care a postat si era pastrata de tine e cea din 10-7
Este foarte interesant ceea ce se intampla.
Daca pot sa te ajut cu ceva,spune-mi
Nu prea ai cu ce mă ajuta. Din momentul ăsta, a devenit o răfuială personală.
Succes !
Sunt la galerie !! :))))
Trimiteți un comentariu