EXIT-POLL MOLDOVA: COMUNISTII PIERD MAJORITATEA

Rezultate exit-poll:
PCRM - 41,7%
PLDM - 17,7%
PLM - 16%
PDM - 12,5%

Eroarea maximă a sondajului este de 2%

35 de milioane de euro, la mişto !

De doi ani s-a introdus in Romania sistemul ECRIS, un sistem informatizat de distribuire a dosarelor catre instante, pentru a se evita posibilitatea ca dosarul sa ajunga la o instanta favorabila uneia din parti. Investitia a costat statul roman 35 de milioane de euro, insa, dupa cum arata o ancheta din "Romania Libera", exista cinci metode de inselare a sistemului. Totul incepe dupa stabilirea componentei instantelor pentru urmatoarele 12 luni, in luna ianurie. Sistemul preia dosarul, iar in termen de 15 zile trebuie sa identifice minim doua complete disponibile, unuia din ele urmand a i se distribui dosarul. De-acum, incep miscarile.

- Metoda 1 : Judecatorul de serviciu preia cererile de trimitere in judecata si le transmite operatorului, care nu asociaza fiecare dosar cu un numar, operatorul introduce doar o lista cu numere pe care inca nu le-a asociat dosarelor. Le atribuie numerele, dupa ce vede la ce complete au ajuns dosarele. Metoda cere complicitatea mai multor persoane.

- Metoda 2 : Cererea este introdusa de mai multe ori, de avocat. Cand acesta observa ca una din ele a ajuns la un complet favorabil, le retrage pe celelalte. Metoda cea mai utilizata.

- Metoda 3 : Micsorarea termenului de judecare, cunoscandu-se zilele cand vor judeca completele (planificarea fiind facuta la inceputul anului). In mod normal, perioada de atribuire poate fi 15-40 de zile. Se scurteaza termenul la 15-20 de zile, astfel incat instantele nefavorabile sa cada in afara intervalului. Metoda "de urgenta", fiinca se observa modificarea.

- Metoda 4 : "Imbolnavirea" subita - cand judecatorul evit un dosar delicat. Odata repartizat un dosar, acesta se poate retrage la momentul potrivit, invocand o paleta larga de motive, de la personale la medicale si chiar profesionale (participarea la un congres, spre exemplu). In locul sau va judeca un loctiitor ales, la fel, la inceputul anului. In termeni de specialitate, dublarea magistratilor se numeste programare de permanenta. Astfel, este suficienta determinarea judecatorului programat initial ca sa gaseasca un motiv pentru a se retrage, fie la mica intelegere, fie prin presiuniile superiorilor, doar pentru ca termenul sa fie judecat de inlocuitorul sau.

- Metoda 5 : Eroare cu premeditare - se intocmeste un proces-verbal in care se justifica stergerea prin aceea ca s-ar fi comis o eroare la inregistrare, de exemplu, pentru ca un dosar ar fi fost inregistrat ca penal, si nu pe civil. Apoi, dosarul e reintrodus in sistemul informatic pentru o noua repartizare. De data asta, e aproape sigur ca acesta nu va mai ajunge la acelasi complet. Cei familiarizati cu sistemul ECRIS sustin ca evitarea magistratului incomod presupune pur si simplu stergerea din calculator a unei repartizari aleatorii corecte.

Aceasta optiune a fost introdusa pentru acele situatii obiective in care o inregistrare in sistem e efectuata eronat, dar neinteresat. Insa lucrurile sunt si mai nuantate in privinta motivelor pentru care o parte interesata ajunge sa acceseze acele parghii prin care repartizarea informatica aleatorie sa fie pusa in offside. Este valabil si in acele situatii in care se doreste ca un dosar sa nu ajunga pe mana unui anumit judecator.

Punctul de vedere al Consiliului Superior al Magistraturii :

"Notiunea de viciu de functionare are un sens prea larg si neprecizat, astfel ca este greu de stabilit raspunsul. Ca orice alt sistem, si acesta poate inregistra pe alocuri erori de functionare, ce pot proveni din diverse motive, generale sau specifice, tehnice sau umane etc."

Pai, da...justitie, etc.

Obiectivele strategice ale înscenării "Perestroika"

O postare preluata de pe site-ul Once Upon a Time in The West ("A fost odata, in Occident"), care se bazeaza pe memorandumul catre C.I.A. din martie 1989, al maiorului KGB, Anatoliy Golitsyn care a dezertat in Occident:

Strategic Objectives of the Perestroika Deception in Russia and Worldwide

To the best of our knowledge, the first excerpt below of former KGB Major Anatoliy Golitsyn's memorandum to the US Central Intelligence Agency, dated March 1989, has never been published online before. The second excerpt, about China, has appeared online already at separate locations. The links are included for additional information and to validate Golitsyn's remarkable predictions.

PREDICTIONS ON THE EXECUTION OF THE STRATEGY’S FINAL PHASE

Expanded Role of the Communist Party

During “perestroika,” the political role of the Communist Party in communist countries will increase, not decrease. The Party will continue to exercise overall supervision and control over the mixed economy through Party members among the managers and technocrats. The Party, operating “underground” and “working by other means,” will provide political guidance to the Congress of Peoples’ Deputies and other “reformed” and successor parliaments and to the new “political parties” and “grassroots democratic associations” through Party cells and individual Party members in the leaderships of these organizations. Guidance to Party members will be given through confidential briefings. Freed from day-to-day supervision over the economy, the Party will devote itself to guiding and implementing “perestroika” in the USSR and Eastern Europe and to implementing the strategy in the West. The Soviet Party apparatus will become a true general staff of world revolution to be carried out through the strategy of “perestroika.”

Stronger, Maturer Ideology

Despite the apparent renunciation of ideological orthodoxy, Communist ideology will grow stronger and more mature. As “perestroika” proceeds, ideology in the Communist countries will be reasserted. Each success for “perestroika” will reinforce the belief of Party members and young Communists in the correctness of their ideology and their cause. Communists will continue to analyze international relations and the situation in the capitalist countries in terms of class analysis. Their “humanism” will continue to see love and hate in class terms. Capitalists, home-grown and foreign, will be hated, never loved; and they will invariably be deceived and take for a ride.

The Party will continue with ideological education and training to prevent contamination by foreign ideologies. Attempts to reform and replace capitalism in the West will be accelerated, not through ideological propaganda, but through the strategy of “perestroika,” leading to “convergence.”

An Improved, Reorganized KGB

One can expect that the KGB will be converted into a new organization with a Western-style name. The reorganization will be presented as a reduction of the role of the service in Soviet society. But, because the KGB’s crucial role in promoting “perestroika” internally and abroad, the reorganization should not be seen as a downgrading. Just as Dzerzhinskiy’s hated Cheka was converted into the more powerful GPU, so will the successor organization to the KGB be more powerful than its predecessor.

The new service will work with kid gloves and more sophisticated methods. Internally, its resources will be devoted to the creation of controlled political plurality (“democratism”). It will create a pseudo-social democratic party and Estonian, Latvian, Lithuanian and Muslim national parties: it will even set up Stalinist and anti-Semitic groups, to give a convincing impression of plurality. Naturally, the service will be behind these groups and parties—controlling and managing them in the interests of the strategy and its objectives. The service will use its intelligence and security assets, particularly its agents of influence in the newly created national fronts, political groups and parties, to carry out the strategy of “restructuring” attitudes and polices in the West.

The New Model Soviet Regime

The Soviets will proceed with “perestroika” on the following lines:

1) A mixed socialist-market economy comparable to the Swedish economy will be established with one crucial difference. Soviet “capitalists” will in fact be secret Party members and Party political tools. Their influence will be used in the interests of the strategy abroad. This is what Soviet maturity means.

2) The Party will create controlled plurality a semblance of social democracy in the USSR. It will not be difficult to do. Even the Stalinist regime in Poland had nominally “non-Communist” “independent” parties. In fact, they were puppet parties.

3) As a mature body, the Soviet parliament will play an active role in the execution of the strategy abroad.

4) The new parliament will be closer to the Swedish model—again, with one difference. It will use its contacts with Western colleagues to influence them towards cooperation and “restructuring” in the West.5) The Soviet Empire will not crumble as a result of nationalist unrest. The Party will create a stronger federation which will be in full control of foreign policy, defence and security but which will provide autonomy to the national Republics to run their own local affairs.

6) As the Party proceeds with successful “perestroika” in the USSR, both Russians and non-Russians will be increasingly inclined to accept it and take part in the process. In the final analysis, their attitude will depend on Western support for Soviet “perestroika” and the improvement in their way of life.

7) Successful Soviet “perestroika” will result in a Soviet regime of pseudo-social democracy with a human face.

8) At this juncture, the Party and the successor to the KGB will do their utmost to exploit the image of their new model, their prestige and the contacts and influence of the new parliament, the national fronts, the political groups and parties and the Soviet capitalists, to carry out the intended strategy of “restructuring” in the West.

“Restructuring” in Eastern Europe and China

A consistent effort will be made to expand and deepen “restructuring” in Eastern Europe and China. The new models will be like Soviet “perestroika” in essence but will reflect the specific national and historical features of each country.

For instance, in Poland the model will include Communist power-sharing with Solidarity and the Catholic hierarchy. In Czechoslovakia, the model will include the experience of 1968; in Hungary the rehabilitation of the revolt of 1956; in East Germany, the desire for reunion with West Germany; and in China, it will reflect the Asian character of socialism, the desire for reunion with Taiwan and the present close relations with the United States. Polish and East German “restructuring” should be particularly closely watched because of their relevance to the “restructuring” of Western Europe.

“Restructuring” in Western Europe

“Perestroika” in the USSR and Eastern Europe will be accompanied by a determined Soviet political and diplomatic offensive to introduce “restructuring” in Western Europe. Gorbachev and East European leaders will try to develop the present détente into close economic, military, political, cultural and scientific cooperation to create “one Europe” without NATO and the Warsaw Pact. A particular effort will be made to develop close relations and cooperation with East European social democrats and the Labour Party in Britain—exploiting the new Soviet pseudo-social democratic, mixed economy image. Attracted by this image and convinced of its authenticity, the social democrats may well respond to this courting.
East Germany will play a crucial role in the “restructuring” of Western Europe and of West Germany in particular. The appointment of Valentin Falin, a leading Soviet expert on Germany, as head of the Central Committee’s Department of International Relations, indicates that the Soviets are preparing and counting on an East Germany initiative. Such an initiative will probably be supported by a Polish demarche such as revival of Rapacki plan for a nuclear-free zone in Central Europe. This time, one can expect the Soviets to remove the Berlin Wall. There is no doubt that their strategists realize that they will be unable to proceed with the strategy of “restructuring” in Europe without removal of the Berlin Wall—just as they were unable to proceed without a Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan. Through removal of the Berlin Wall, the Soviets may be able to strike a new, Rapallo-style deal with the West Germans, particularly with a Social Democratic government, entailing their departure from NATO and acceptance of neutrality.Given that Soviet “perestroika” incorporates by design many Euro-Communist positions (criticism of Soviet repressive practices, condemnation of the intervention in Czechoslovakia in 1968, broadening Soviet democracy), Euro-Communist parties will join and support the movement for “restructuring” in Europe which will give them new opportunities for revitalizing themselves. They will attempt to establish unity of action with social democrats to bring about “restructuring” in their own countries. Dubcek’s re-emergence from obscurity and his recent visit to Italy at the invitation of the Italian Communist Party supports the notion that the Euro-Communists will seek to exploit Soviet and East European “perestroika” to regain political influence in their own countries. Support for Soviet and East European “perestroika” by the Italian and French governments renders the socialist parties of these countries vulnerable to approaches from the Communists.

“Restructuring” in the Third World

An active Soviet and East European offensive to carry out “restructuring” in the Third World can be expected. The present Soviet readiness to contemplate and even encourage the settlement of armed conflicts by their proxies does not mean the abandonment of their objective of Communist penetration of the region concerned. It represents no more than change of tactics. The strategy of “restructuring” broadens Soviet opportunities for gaining influence through the achievement of political solutions. The reformed regimes in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe will engage with the West European social democratic parties and the Socialist International in introducing and carrying out “restructuring” in the Third World and particularly in Latin America. Exploiting the debt problem and the example of Soviet “perestroika,” they will seek unity of action with labour, religious, student, human rights and ecological movements. The impact of Soviet “perestroika” on these countries may be expected to grow. The Mexican press is already drawing parallels between Soviet “perestroika” and political change in Mexico described as “Salinastroika.” The former Mexican communist leader made the same comparison. Fuentes, the left-wing Mexican novelist, wrote recently that Salinas must become a Mexican Gorbachev if he wishes to change the state of affairs in Mexico. Another example is the recent offer of the Salvadorean guerrilla leaders to disarm themselves if the Salvadorean army is restructured.
These examples indicate the beginning of a trend towards “restructuring” in Latin America. The trend will accelerate if the United States begins to help it without taking into account the Soviet strategic design that lies behind it.

Given the fragility of democracy, the desperate economic situation and the debt problem, particularly in Latin America, one can expect an active, joint operation by the Soviets, the East Europeans and European social democrats (with their money) to bring to power Allende- or Sandinista-type regimes and “restructuring” in these countries along the lines of the new, reformed Soviet model.

“Restructuring” American Military-Political Alliances

The Soviets will exploit the image of the reformed and peaceful Soviet systems to shatter the Western consensus about the Soviet threat and the need for political and military alliances. In Europe, the Soviets will probably attempt to create a serious rift in NATO or break it up altogether by removing the Berlin Wall and reaching a Rapallo-style deal with West Germany involving West Germany withdrawing from NATO and following Austria into neutrality. In Asia, the Soviets may attempt to break up the US-Japan security pact by returning the Kurile Islands to Japan and offering Japan economic concessions to promote the development of Siberia.

As the Soviets carry out “restructuring” in the Third World, they will use their influence to reduce the American presence in the region.

“Restructuring” in the United States

The Soviets will do their utmost to persuade the new Administration (of US President George H. W. Bush) to follow Reagan’s policy of embracing “perestroika” and rapprochement with the Soviet Union. They will intensify the efforts of Gorbachev and Sakharov to engage the American elite in cooperation over the environment, space, disarmament and the joint “solution” of social, political, economic, environmental, military and international problems.

Visits by Soviet scientists, politicians, intellectuals and cultural delegations will be stepped up in order to put across to the Americans the ideas of “restructuring” and convergence. Likewise, more American scientists, intellectuals, opinion-formers, politicians and religious groups will be invited to the USSR where they will be subjected to persuasion on the advantages of “restructuring” and convergence.

Soviet agents of influence in the United States will redouble their attempts to act as catalysts in promoting “restructuring” and convergence. They will initiate public debates on security aimed at shattering the American consensus on the Soviet threat and destabilizing and “restructuring” the US military-industrial complex. KGB agents among Soviet “dissidents” and cultural defectors will travel back and forth between the United States and the USSR acting as bridge-builders in cultural and political convergence. The whole political potential of the KGB-controlled political parties and so-called “grassroots organizations” will be used to establish links with their genuine counterparts in the United States and influence them toward “restructuring.”

During their visits to the United States they will try to impress the Americans with the growing similarity of their system to the American system and to convince them of the soundness of convergence as a means of avoiding nuclear war.As “restructuring” proceeds in Eastern Europe, the East Europeans will join the Soviet offensive to gain a foothold in the United States to secure their share of political influence over the American ethnic minorities.

(Anatoliy Golitsyn, The Perestroika Deception: The World's Slide Towards the Second October Revolution: Memoranda to the Central Intelligence Agency, London: Edward Harle, 1995, 1998; pages 27-32)

CHINA: A STRATEGIC ENEMY OF THE UNITED STATES

Communist China is not a strategic partner but a concealed strategic enemy of the United States. China will join in the Soviet offensive to bring about 'restructuring' in the United States and worldwide.

Through penetration, Chinese Communist intelligence destroyed the ClA's sources in China during the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s and prevented the Agency developing reliable sources on the strategic intentions of the Chinese leaders. The National Security Agency cannot help because information on secret Sino-Soviet strategic coordination is not carried on accessible communications channels.

This situation leaves American policymakers poorly informed on the subject. American policymakers from the time of Nixon and Kissinger to the present day have become known for their excessive reliance on the verbal assurances of Mao, Chou En-Lai and Deng. Reliance on their word is no substitute for good intelligence.

Because of this intelligence gap, America's policymakers have not distinguished between China's tactics and her strategy. This failure is not new: it was evident as early as the Second World War when the Americans failed to realise that the Chinese Communists' cooperation with the Nationalists against the Japanese was a tactic adopted in order to achieve their strategic objective - their victory over the Nationalists. Some of the statements of the Chinese leaders to their own followers are unflattering about American policymakers and are, in fact, disturbing. In the late 1960s, Mao advised the Party not to take the Americans seriously in a strategic, but only in a tactical sense. Deng's well known statement about a cat catching a mouse, made when China was introducing capitalism and receiving American technology, can be interpreted as meaning that the Chinese Communist leader is the cat that caught the American mouse.

Because of their confusion, American policymakers believe that Communist China is an important strategic partner and a strategic rival and enemy of the Soviet Union. In this they are wrong. China is a tactical, not a strategic partner of the United States and a tactical, but not a strategic "enemy" of the Soviet Union.

The grounds for this conclusion are to be found by analysing the long-range Communist strategy which illuminates the strategic role of China.

Communist China was one of the principal architects of the Communists' long-range strategy. The Sino-Soviet 'split' was a common strategic disinformation operation to secure the successful preparation of their common strategy of 'restructuring'. The Soviet and Chinese leaders have continued their secret strategic coordination through a division of labour.


Gorbachev's 'perestroika' and Deng's 'Four Modernisations' (a Chinese euphemism for 'restructuring', or 'perestroika') are two similar elements in the final phase of the common strategy.

In the light of the new method of analysis, the purpose of Shevardnadze's hastily arranged trip to China on the eve of President Bush's visit was to give advice to Deng on his talks with the American President. Gorbachev and Deng will use their meeting to discuss coordination and new initiatives to be taken during the final phase of the strategy The new analysis sees the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan as a tactical move en route to the principal strategic objective - 'restructuring' e.g., engaging the United States in support of 'perestroika'.

China's close relations with the United States and even Chinese helpfulness to the United States over the Pakistan-Afghanistan situation are tactics intended to secure China's primary strategic objective of becoming a modem superpower with the help of American technology.

According to this analysis, the Chinese leaders are using their own Party apparatus and security services to try to repeat Soviet successes in creating controlling political opposition and introducing its members to the United States in order to shape American policy in the interests of a common Communist strategy.

In fact the Chinese have been so impressed by Sakharov's success in gaining influence in the United States that they are developing their own Sakharovs - agents of influence among leading Chinese 'dissident' scientists. Thus it can be predicted that the Chinese will establish their own foothold of influence in the United States and will eventually join the Soviet offensive to procure American 'restructuring'.

For China is destined to become a primary Soviet partner in the future World Government towards which Moscow and Peking are jointly proceeding.

(Golitsyn, The Perestroika Deception, pages 35-36)

The Perestroika Deception [PDF]

Candidatul Oprescu. Sciziunea PSD.

Dupa congresul PSD din 2005, cand Geoana a preluat conducerea partidului, s-a manifestat o grupare in interiorul PSD, in jurul lui Iliescu si Nastase, care a contestat permanent atat linia politica, cat si persoanele din conducerea partidului. Candidatura lui Sorin Oprescu la Primaria Generala a Bucurestiului a devoalat strategia iliesciana, de coalizare cu petroliberalii, atat in meciul extern cu Traian Basescu si PD-L, cat si in cel intern, cu oamenii lui Mircea Geoana. In turul doi, Oprescu a fost sustinut deschis de PNL (unii mai imprudenti s-au dat de gol, nesprijinindu-l pe candidatul PNL, Ludovic Orban, ci pe Oprescu). Este evident ca Oprescu a candidat atunci in pregatirea viitoarei candidaturi la presedintie, lui Papasha neconvenindu-i nici macar eventualitatea ca Mircea Geoana sa castige alegerile.

Oprescu a dezmintit constant ca ar putea candida. Insa, la emisiunea "Zig-Zag", cu Ion Cristoiu, de la Antena 3 (ieri), pentru prima oara in public, nu a exclus eventualitatea candidaturii : "E o hotarare de viata si nu vreau sa ma joc cu viata oamenilor. Mai am nevoie de timp ca sa decid. Daca e sa candidez voi candida independent fiindca asa vor oamenii si fiindca eu nu sunt obisnuit sa fiu sluga la darloaga".

Asadar : Oprescu anticipeaza faptul ca PSD va veni tot cu Geoana drept candidat, asa ca va incerca repetarea scenariului de la Bucuresti. Dupa jalnica evolutie a celuilalt om al lui Iliescu (Crin Antonescu), devenise clar ca acesta nu are vreo sansa de a patrunde in turul doi. Nu este exclusa retragerea sa si a iepurelui Duda, spre a-l sustine pe Oprescu - mutare sinucigasa, care ar indeparta si pe ultimii liberali de buna-credinta care inca nu cred ceea ce vad. Adrian Nastase este prevazut in planul lui Iliescu drept viitor prim-ministru, in cazul in care Antonescu ori Oprescu ar castiga alegerile prezidentiale.

Dar realitatea este ca, ORICINE ar castiga alegerile prezidentiale, la PSD se produce sciziunea. Nu neaparat rapid, poate intr-un an, doi, cel mult. Depinde cand vor fi programate alegerile anticipate.

Fragment din emisiune - atentie dupa min 1:15

HOT HEADLINES

Abandoned USDollar & Paradigm Shift

Americans Now Pariahs of Foreign Banks

Swine Flu Epidemic: 160 Britons Held in Quarantine Abroad as Children Found to be 'Super-Spreaders' of the Virus

Billions of People Expected to Die Under Current Codex Alimentarius Guidelines

NWO De-Population Document

Manufactured Crisis To Rescue Failing Obama Agenda?

Obama is Rapidly Turning US into a Totalitarian Regime

 
Russia Builds Key Naval HQ in Syria: Missile Presence Worries Israel

FBI Talking About Bill Ayers – video

Astronaut Buzz Aldrin Comments on the "Monolith" on Mars Moon Phobos: "God Put It There"

 
Artificial Brain '10 Years Away'

NATO sau "Fortele Armate U.E." ?

Why is the European union Building an Army?

The European Union Is building an army, and the Lisbon treaty will help them do this. they call this process "between the eu member states on eu status of forces". In a time of recession we should be spending money on improving peoples living conditions and not on weapons and war.

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM FOR THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE MEMBER STATES ON EU STATUS OF FORCES

Command Paper number : Cm 7572 [PDF 121k, new window]

Title of the Treaty

1. Agreement between the Member States of the European Union concerning the status of military and civilian staff seconded to the institutions of the European Union, of the headquarters and forces which may be made available to the European Union in the context of the preparation and execution of the tasks referred to in Article 17(2) of the Treaty on European Union, including exercises, and of the military and civilian staff of the Member States put at the disposal of the European Union to act in this context (EU SOFA).

2. The EU agreement on the Status of Forces (EU SOFA) concerns the legal status of military and civilian personnel seconded to the Military Staff of the European Union (EUMS). It also covers national headquarters and forces that may be used by the EU during an EU military or civilian exercise within the territory of the Union. It is intended that the EU SOFA will cover situations where other Status of Forces Agreements, notably the NATO Status of Forces Agreement (NATO SOFA), do not apply.

3. The Agreement sets out the legal provisions that will enable military and civilian personnel to carry out their duties. The Agreement is divided into three parts to deal with the different categories of people to which it applies:

- Part I sets out provisions that apply to all military and civilian staff covered by the EUSOFA. It includes the definition of military and civilian staff for the purposes of this Agreement. It sets out the rights of civilian and military staff to wear uniform, drive using licences issued by their own country and receive medical care. It also makes clear the obligation on personnel covered by this Agreement to respect the laws of their host state and to act in a way consistent with their position.

- Part II covers the military and civilian staff seconded to the EU institutions - principally the EUMS. Provisions of this part give such military and civilian staff, where authorised by their orders and subject to the national regulations of the receiving State, the right to possess and carry arms. Immunities from legal process enjoyed by these staff in respect of acts undertaken in the course of their official functions are also set out in this part.

- Part III covers headquarters and forces and the personnel within them. This sets out the rights of forces to secure their premises; inviolability of documents of headquarters; the arrangements for taxation; jurisdiction over military and civilian personnel; and arrangements for liabilities and claims.

- The final provisions of the Agreement are contained in Part IV, including the procedures for ratification and entry into force. Part IV also regulates which SOFA applies in a specific situation where there is ambiguity, for example, where forces on an EU operation make use of NATO assets and capabilities. Insofar as military and civilian staff at HQ and forces are concerned, the EU SOFA will only apply where those staff are not regulated by another agreement governing their status. This means that the NATO SOFA will apply wherever possible.

4. The Agreement was signed by all 15 EU Member States on 17 November 2003. On enlargement of the Union the new EU Member States also became party to the agreement.

5. The Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs has lead responsibility for the European Security and Defence Policy. The Secretary of State for Defence has responsibility for military aspects and for the application of military law. The Chancellor of the Exchequer has responsibility for the tax exemption aspects. The Home Secretary has responsibility for the firearms and immigration aspects. The Home Office and the Department for International Development would also be involved for any crisis response operation involving military and civilian personnel under the EU SOFA within the territory of the EU.

Policy Considerations

General

6. The EU Status of Forces Agreement is important as it will establish the status of foreign military and civilian personnel participating in ESDP activities. It will allow members of the armed forces of other EU Member States to be deployed on UK soil in support of the command of EU operations or the conduct of training exercises. It will in turn enable UK Armed Forces when engaged in operations or exercises in EU Member States to enjoy the general immunities and privileges applying to domestic armed forces, with reciprocal arrangements for armed forces from those countries engaged in exercises in the UK.

7. The close consistency between the EU SOFA and the NATO SOFA means that the status of our forces should be the same whether an operation/exercise is led by NATO or by the EU.

Financial

8. There are no immediate financial implications of this Agreement. If the UK were to provide a headquarters for a future EU operation/exercise this Agreement would offer tax exemptions to personnel from other EU Member States working at this headquarters. This is intended to prevent double taxation of staff ordinarily resident in another EU Member State and does not change the right of a State to tax its own military and civilian staff.

Reservations and Declarations

9. None.

Implementation

10. The UK signed the EU SOFA on 17 November 2003. The Agreement will enter into force on the first day of the second month following ratification by the last of the EU Member States

Rt Hon David Miliband MP

Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs

*****************


"Nu transformati U.E.intr-un nou U.R.S.S.!"



Europarlamentar danez demascand minciunile Lisbon Treaty

Papai măturând grajdurile lui Augias C. Neculai

Un hypertext al lui AVP, aparut AICI. Senzational:

**************************

Un text-test pt prietenii mei Dorin si Florin…

Asa cum am spus aici, io nu-mi mai fac iluzia ca vreo sfortza curata, imaculata, ori vreun arici pogonici dintre telectualii nostri cica mai voinici, breslasi calici de cariere mici, dar cu fashionabil sclipici, si nici chiar senioru ala dac-ar invia si-ar fi inconjurat de-aceiasi comilitoni famelici, ca sa nu mai pomenesc de nea Goma, cu obsesiile-i doldora de fantasmatici priculici antisemitici, deci nimenea, aloo, n-ar mai phootea sa faca cine stie ce rahat – in sensu bun, n-asa ? – p-acilisha, decat tot a s t i a, care-au slujit Raul candva, chit ca unii fara sa vrea, si care astazi, vazand c-au scapat ca prin urechile acului dintr-o cumpana istorica pentru ei f. grea, ar trebui sa stea dreq in banca lor, reshpektive sa se retraga ale pleshitza si cupola tovilor si baietilor, ilicilor, butimanilor, bomboneilor, geonelilor, felicsilor, sovilor, hrebenciucilor, paturicilor in rezervatia umbroasa a Manastirii Secu-lilor, aia manoasa, si sa-si consume pana la sfarsitu zilelor (intr-o fericire cam rusinoasa, dar asta e situatia, n-asa ?) pomana destinului cea puturoasa, insa crezi ca tovii si baietii facura asa, bey…? Din contra, cei mai multi dintre ei nici de-ai ciumii nu se lasa, ci-ncorajati de faptu ca inca nu le-a reintrat nea Nicu-n casa, fiindc-au avut grija sa-l rataceasca pe la Ghencea-civil subt iarba grasa, isi inchipuie ca abia acum a sosit era lor ticaloasa, crezand ca dupa ce-au hapait emolumentu SSMD (sau a Matusii mostenire pacatoasa, cum ar veni…), tot ei vor suge si tzitza lu tante Ioropa cea laptoasa, fara sa bage de seama – caci asa e cand iti ia Dzeu mintile, nainte de a te pierde – ca barbatu lu tante Ioropa asta, ascuns intr-un Tufish inca verde, doar se preface ca nu-i vede si le pregateste scatoalca pe-ndelete, dar implacabil, n-asa…? In loc sa stea cu ochii pe palma grea ce se-apropie deloc furioasa, dar inflexibila ca razbunarea unui pasha de tagma lor de moroi cu rinza groasa si sa-l ajute sa-i extraga mai repede – chiar pe ei, aloo…- din iepocalu Shit pe cel ce vrea sa curatze cat de cat “sistemu ticalosit” (si nu pentru c-ar avea de gand sa moara cu el de gat ori pentru ca odata n-a fost si el subt vremi, ca stravechiu’ cronicar, ci fiindca e mai lucid si mai putin avar decat cinu-i deja f. reactionar, n-asa…? si vrea sa-l conduca la limanu pensionar, macar, mai sacrificand azi un nemernic lorar, maine un scarbos sforar, poimaine un turnator mai mult or mai putin ordinar si tot asa pana trece ceasu rau, iar libertarienii desfiinteaza – precum pedeapsa aia capitala abrogata de criptoteroristi la potou – si orisice bulau…), asadeci astia, ex-tovii si baietii in dement chor si orbi ca imparatu cartitzelor, pe insusi Salvatoru lor il fluiera, il scuipa si-l abhor…

Exempli gratia, l-ati auzit voi pe Base cel afurisit, ins ager ca un shish la fierariile din Toledo otzelit, pe care tembelii, hapsanii si nebunii astia mai obraznici si ca un sacal lihnit nu l-ar fi meritat nici dac-ar fi fost mai nevinovati ca un Miel ranit, l-ati auzit sa zica macar o vorbulita atunci cand in Raportu Tismaneanu, dupa ce s-a conchis asupra faptului de netagaduit ca Lagaru Iepocal a fost in integrum criminal, normal, si s-a propus ca penziile si alte privilegii ale criminalei kakistocratii, cum ar veni, sa fie nu taiate din ale statului visterii, ci aduse baremi la nivelu penziei mijlocii (penzie mai mare, aloo, de vreo 3-4 ori ca leafa-mi de hero antico… ), ei bine, l-ati auzit sa-si aminteasca de chestia asta, priatelo…?

Insa una preste alta si-n lipsa orishicarei alternative cat de cat reale p-acilisha (deci nu ca aia pe care ne-o propuse Varu Jan candva, iar azi pricepem ca doar turcu stia ce drakkula fu si cu alternativa asta, n-asa…?), io va spun ca n-avem alta solutie decat a-l astepta pe ist Papai ca sa dea naiba un pic cu matura prin grajdurile lu Augias C. Neculai, bagand gunoiu – macar de dragu next generation de didiloi – subt covoru unde timpurile noi ne-au gasit cu creacii goi, reshpektive alde noi pe post de amarati, dar rezistenti pitzigoi, normal, iar preste noi calu troian iepocal, cu madularu-i fatal…

ps.Florin Iaru ii ricana mai ieri lu Riddick, cerandu-i sa i se livreze un singur text in care el, poetul optzecist, sa-l fi periat ori macar sa-l fi menajat pe patronul gazetei la care scrie (”Adevarul”)… Ii replic io acum ca atacul sau dur asupra lu Eba & Basescu este echivalent cu a-l peria insistent pe dusmanu’ de moarte al fam Basescu, Conu Dinu… Tare ma tem, iacata, ca nu dragostea fierbinte de liberalizm il mana pe amicul meu in lupta, ci amoru’ mai mult sau mai putin secret fata de patronu’ sau… Cat despre impartialiatatea celuilalt arcadian, Dinescu, mai bine sa nu mai vbim, aloo…; nu de alta, insa ne-aude dreq Moscova carciumareasa…

Din pacate n-am suficient timp sa fiu pe faza la aceste discutii incinse, cum ar veni… Ce pot sa le spun amicilor mei, in esenta, este ca daca as avea un singur strop de dovada ca Base ista nu e ce-mi pare a fi: reshpektive, un om decis sa se bata, totusi, cu “sistemul ticalosit” din care a facut parte, insa nu pentru a-l demantela total (caci nimeni nu poate sa faca trebusoara asta, hic et nunc, nici macar o bomba atomica, aloo…), ci sprea a-l hiigeniza cat de cat si spre a lasa o urma a trecerii sale prin functia si prin iepoca asta…, l-as repudia ad hoc si as concluziona ca tzarisoara dodoloatza nu mai are nici pic de noroc… Pe de alta parte, daca n-as fi convins ca de la Iliescu si ai lui (adversarii Basescului), precum si de la “liberalii” aliati (prin oamenii si interesele petrolului…) cu ai Ivan Iliciului, nu se mai poate astepta nemic bun, credeti c-as fi naiv sau nebun sa v-o spun, mey…? Nu, bey, as tacea si io ca un oportunist shogun si, astfel, as deveni un filosof cu malai bun…

pps. Florine, tu ai urmarit interviurile lu EBA cu Mandruta, Cristoiu si Ciutacu, mey…? Cauta-le pe Google, rumega-le si pe urma, daca mai continui sa spui ca fata asta de nici 30 de anisori e proasta, lipsita de talent politic ori de charisma, chiar ca ma pui pe ganduri, bre… Hai sa fim seriosi, amice: la 30 de ani, cei mai multi oameni nici nu stiu ca exista, darmite sa se miste intr-un mediu atat de toxic precum este politica actuala loco, aloo, priatelo, ori sa scrie “Apelul catre Europa”, pe vremea cand nici macar Ioropa asta nu egzista… Hai pa…

***************************

Fraza zilei

"Domnul Geoană, fiind şef peste bostănărie, nu are nicio responsabilitate pentru reforma în justiţie."

Diplome - la liber !

"The Graduate" ("Absolventul") - 1967, scena finala. Cu Dustin Hoffman si Katharine Ross.

Scandalul "Spiru Haret" nu pare sa duca spre o concluzie prea curand. Asa incat, ne vom multumi cu versurile din "The Graduate" (Simon & Garfunkel - "The Sound of Silence") :

Hello darkness, my old friend
I've come to talk with you again
Because a vision softly creeping
Left its seeds while I was sleeping
And the vision that was planted in my brain
Still remains
Within the sound of silence

In restless dreams I walked alone
Narrow streets of cobblestone
'Neath the halo of a street lamp
I turn my collar to the cold and damp
When my eyes were stabbed by the flash of a neon light
That split the night
And touched the sound of silence

And in the naked light I saw
Ten thousand people, maybe more
People talking without speaking
People hearing without listening
People writing songs that voices never shared
No one dared
Disturb the sound of silence

"Fools," said I, "you do not know
Silence like a cancer grows
Hear my words that I might teach you
Take my arms that I might reach you"
But my words like silent raindrops fell
And echoed in the wells of silence

And the people bowed and prayed
To the neon god they made
And the sign flashed out its warning
In the words that it was forming
And the sign said "The words of the prophets are written on the subway walls
And tenement halls"
And whispered in the sound of silence

Paul Simon, 1964

- Simon & Garfunkel - The Sound Of Silence

Semnale

A inceput sa circule o stire conform careia Rusia si China ar fi transmis un avertisment catre presedintele S.U.A., ca, in cazul in care va permite Israelului sa atace Iranul, raspunsul din partea Rusiei si Chinei va fi "razboiul mondial". Se pare ca o mare parte din fortele navale israeliene s-ar fi deplasat prin Canalul Suez catre Iran, iar in Kurdistanul irakian asteapta ordinul de atac cca 30 de avioane de lupta inarmate cu bombe anti-bunker.

Analisti militari rusi ar fi intocmit o serie de rapoarte, in urma carora ar fi fost dat avertismentul. Rapoartele sustin ca Israelul ar ataca cu aviatia instalatiile nucleare iraniene, iar in urma unui atac combinat Hezbollah (din Liban) si Iran, ar riposta cu rachete cu incarcatura nucleara de pe nave si submarine. Presedintele Bush ar fi refuzat, chiar inainte de incheierea mandatului, livrarea de 1000 de bombe ghidate anti-bunker de mare putere, insa Israelul a obtinut deja 100, in 2005. Primul-ministru israelian, Benyamin Netanyahu, i-ar fi spus lui Barrack Hussein Obama, in primele zile de la instalare : "Ori te ocupi de Iran, repede, ori o voi face eu!".

Se precipita si declararea independentei Kurdistanului, care dispune de o armata bine echipata si instruita, inclusiv de Israel. Siria a declarat ca nu va ramane neutra. O situatie mai complicata o are Turcia (stat membru NATO), care ar putea interveni impotriva aliatilor NATO, Israelul si Kurdistanul.

Avertismentul Rusiei si Chinei ar mai mentiona si instituirea unui embargo asupra petrolului provenit din Orientul Mijlociu, si impotriva livrarilor de arme in regiune. Suplimentar, China a mai avertizat ca daca Israelul va ataca, nu va mai finanta datoria S.U.A., fiind in prezent principalul finantator extern al deficitului de 1000 miliarde $, estimat a se dubla in toamna. China dispune de rezerve de lichiditati de 2000 de miliarde $.
Nu se cunoaste cum va functiona Iron Dome ("Cupola de fier" - denumirea sistemului anti-racheta israelian), fiind estimate circa 6000 de rachete posibil a fi lansate de Siria, Iran si Hezbollah.

Un Raport..."antidemocratic si contraproductiv"

Se apropie data de 22 iulie, cand se va cunoaste oficial continutul Raportului pe justitie, document redactat semestrial de Comisia Europeana si inaintat spre aprobare catre Consiliul de Ministri si Parlamentul European. El va intra in discutia Consiliului de Ministri abia in septembrie sau octombrie, cand se va intruni Consiliul.
Raportul ar putea intra in discutia PE, daca s-ar vota numirea unui raportor si s-ar adopta o rezolutie, la cererea unui numar suficient de europarlamentari, desi pana acum nu s-au luat in discutie rapoartele precedente.

Continutul Raportului pare echilibrat, cere Parlamentului roman sa aprobe toate cererile Parchetului in ceea ce priveste anchetarea demnitarilor, mentioneaza eforturile DNA si recomanda mentinerea procesului de monitorizare pe justitie.

Dar PSD, prin europarlamentarii sai, a emis o declaratie asupra Raportului, care incepe asa:

"Europarlamentarii PSD îşi exprimă îngrijorarea în legătură cu conţinutul proiectului de raport al Comisiei Europene vizând progresele realizate de România în cadrul Mecanismului de cooperare şi verificare (MCV). În măsura în care, în timpul scurt rămas până la anunţata publicare a raportului, textul acestuia nu va suferi serioase modificări, se va putea ajunge la situaţia în care atât Parlamentul European cât şi Guvernul României să îl respingă în totalitate ca fiind antidemocratic şi contraproductiv în lupta împotriva corupţiei."

Urmeaza o insiruire de obiectii asupra textului, le redau pe cele mai importante:

"Raportul cere Parlamentului să valideze cererile Parchetului fără nicio posibilitate de a le respinge; partidelor să renunţe la diferenţele ideologice în procesul legislativ (care astfel ar fi depolitizat); iar acuzaţilor să nu utilizeze dreptul la apărare. Astfel, procedurile judiciare s-ar scurta iar legile ar fi mai clare. Această concepţie antiparlamentară şi antipluralistă are un caracter dictatorial şi atacă bazele statului de drept." Cujetare adanca la pesedeu: CE are conceptie antiparlamentara si antipluralista.

"Proiectul de raport menţionează că "DNA şi-a menţinut un bun traseu de investigaţii nepartizane". Afirmaţia, singura cu adevărat laudativă din întreg raportul, e total neargumentată şi în contradicţie cu percepţia larg răspândită privind politizarea acţiunilor acestei instituţii." Perceptie larg raspandita...prin clientela "322".

Si finalul:

"Faţă de cele menţionate, modificarea raportului precum şi investigarea bunei credinţe şi a profesionalismului experţilor CE apar ca absolut necesare. Până la lămurirea acestor aspecte publicarea raportului nu poate decât să creeze mai multe probleme decât să rezolve." Investigati-i, tata, precis are Piratu' cativa plantati pe-acolo...

Problema justitiei in Romania poate fi in mare masura rezolvata de Parlament. Dar, ca un facut, de aproape 20 de ani, avem parca si noi, ca in Anglia secolului XVII, Parlamentul Cel Lung. Care sub masca democratiei si legitimitatii, de fapt este complicele major al infractorilor. Parlamentul Cel Lung a durat 20 de ani si a fost dizolvat de Oliver Cromwell. Poate pe-al nostru o sa-l dizolvam noi insine, prin alegeri anticipate.

Update - Cuvantarea lui Cromwell la dizolvarea Parlamentului Cel Lung, 1653 (s-a mai reunit de cateva ori pana in 1660, cand s-a autodizolvat) :

20 April 1653

"It is high time for me to put an end to your sitting in this place, which you have dishonoured by your contempt of all virtue, and defiled by your practice of every vice; ye are a factious crew, and enemies to all good government; ye are a pack of mercenary wretches, and would like Esau sell your country for a mess of pottage, and like Judas betray your God for a few pieces of money. Is there a single virtue now remaining amongst you? Is there one vice you do not possess? Ye have no more religion than my horse; gold is your God; which of you have not barter'd your conscience for bribes? Is there a man amongst you that has the least care for the good of the Commonwealth? Ye sordid prostitutes have you not defil'd this sacred place, and turn'd the Lord's temple into a den of thieves, by your immoral principles and wicked practices? Ye are grown intolerably odious to the whole nation; you were deputed here by the people to get grievances redress'd, are yourselves gone! You have been sat too long here for any good you have been doing. Depart, I say, and let us have done with you. So! Take away that shining bauble there, and lock up the doors. In the name of God, go! "

Prin haos, spre Guvernarea Globală ?!

Doua clipuri care arata anumite tendinte in politica mondiala. Priviti-l pe primul, observati fastaceala lui Barroso, cum se incheie la nasturi, ce fals suna replica data. Nici nu ma mira daca voi auzi ca va fi sustinut de grupul socialist din "Parlamentul European". Al doilea clip este ceva mai aplicat, si trateaza si latura economica. Sa vedem ce se va mai scorni la toamna, dupa ce vor tranti a doua oara irlandezii referendumul asupra asa-zisului Tratat de la Lisabona. Presedintele Cehiei, Vaclav Klaus, a declarat ca va fi ultimul sef de stat din UE care va promulga ratificarea "tratatului".

Încă unu', neconsultat

A inceput sa fie discutat statutul PD-L si protocolul aliantei guvernamentale prin media mogulistica.

Deranjeaza operativitatea rocadei de la MTS, astia ar vrea sedinta publica pe treptele din Modrogan, i-a luat grija pe tonomati de statut si protocol.

Din pacate, pun umarul la diversiuni si membri importanti ai PD-L, (involuntar sau nu, vom vedea), precum Cezar Preda. Care este in vacanta in strainatate, acum in an electoral decisiv.

Omu' se declara nemultumit ca a fost anuntat prin SMS despre schimbarea de la MTS. Cu roaming, evident. Nu prea ar fi statutara numirea, cica... Declaratie de azi dimineata. Bai, nene...stai dracu' p-aci, daca zici ca ai treaba. Nu voi da citate ori linkuri cu "ideile", se va ocupa masina de zgomote.

La Vantu-TV, in studio, derbedeii Cosmin Gusa si Codrin Stefanescu. Sunt intrebati diversi europarlamentari despre cestiune. Cand vine randul lui Theodor Stolojan, le replica scurt tonomatilor, cand sar calul si incearca smecherii : "v-ati gresit interlocutorul".

Dupa-amiaza, este in direct la Vantu-TV (telefonic) acelasi C.P., care nuanteaza, marturisind ca a si fost contactat telefonic personal de Emil Boc in cursul zilei de azi. In continuare, se declara suparat, "ca nu facem ceea ce trebuie"...

El, face ceea ce trebuie...altcuiva.

Wikipedia updates

In WorldNetDaily a aparut un interesant articol, care arata modificarile pe site-ul Wikipedia, la rubrica "Early life and career of Barack Obama" ("Copilaria si cariera lui Barack Obama"). In Wikipedia sunt enuntate doua state in care s-ar fi nascut Barack Hussein Obama, Kenya si S.U.A.

Situatia, cronologic:

Ora 4:45 p.m. Eastern (Coasta de Est) : "S-a nascut fie in Honolulu, S.U.A., fie in Mombasa, Kenya." Click to zoom.


Ora 5:05 p.m. Eastern (dupa 20 min) : "S-a nascut fie in Honolulu, S.U.A., fie in Mombasa, Kenya.Refuzul lui Obama de a prezenta originalul certificatului sau de nastere lasa acest important detaliu fara confirmare".


Ora 5:35 p.m. Eastern : Se mentioneaza ca certificatul ar fi specificat in mod expres spitalul in care a avut loc nasterea si numele doctorului.


5:50 p.m. Eastern : Se mentioneaza chestiunea eligibilitatii constitutionale in cazul in care nu ar fi nascut in S.U.A.


6:20 p.m. Eastern : "undeva in Kenya" devine doar "in Kenya".


6:33 p.m. Eastern : Toate mentiunile privind nasterea in Kenya sau problema eligibilitatii constitutionale sunt eliminate


Peste noapte se tot schimba, astfel incat WorldNetDaily, la 1:35 a.m. Eastern, gaseste iar mentiunea "Hawaii sau Kenya".

Nu am intrat la Wikipedia, sa vad acum ce-o mai scrie. Dar parca si in Romania s-au mai intamplat ciudatenii, un presedinte care a depus de trei ori juramantul si care avea doua mame...