15 martie 2022

Începe-al lumii lor apus



 
 
„Niciodată nu ne vom mai baza pe Occident”: Lavrov spune că Rusia își va rezolva problemele economice / „Vom rezolva această problemă în așa fel încât să nu mai depindem niciodată de partenerii [noștri] occidentali, fie că este vorba de guverne sau companii care nu sunt ghidate de interesele afacerilor lor, ci au devenit un instrument de agresiune politică, ceea ce Rusia experimentează acum din Occident”, a spus el. „Ne vom asigura să nu ne mai găsim niciodată într-o situație similară și că niciun „unchi Sam” sau altcineva nu poate lua decizii care au ca scop distrugerea economiei noastre”, a promis el. Vom găsi o modalitate de a nu mai depinde de occident și ar fi trebuit să se facă cu mult timp în urmă”, a adăugat Lavrov.

Romanii nu s’au lasat orbiti de propaganda de razboi cu care se incercat acoperirea dezastrului economic si social din Romania / Desi asupra romanilor s’a dus o uriasa presiune psihologica al carui efect scontat era acela de a ii convinge ca Romania ar trebui sa fie pregatita de a intra in razboi alaturi de Ucraina in cazul extinderi conflictului, acelasi sondaj CURS demonstreaza faptul ca romanii nu s’au lasat prostiti de propaganda, peste 76% dintre ei refuzand varianta implicarii militare a Romaniei in acest razboi, singurul ajutor acceptat de romani pentru razboiul din Ucraina fiind cel umanitar.

Gheorghe Piperea: Guvernul ia în calcul să distribuie gratuit populației 30 de milioane de pastile de iodură de potasiu produse de Antibiotice Iași. Link în comentarii. Ce vor ăștia să ne spună, totuși? Să alimenteze o nouă spirală a panicii care să “legitimeze” o dictatură militară în România, sub denumirea de “stare de criză”?  Să ne spună că, în mod real, se întâmplă ceva grav în plan nuclear, la Cernobîl sau la Fukushima? Iar acum, ca în povestea cu Petrică și lupul, nu îi mai poate crede nimeni?

Colapsul Europei / A doua fază s-a încheiat și asistăm deja la împărțirea lumii în părți americane și non-americane. De acum, conotațiile politice recunoscute – vest și est – nu mai sunt utile. Harta noii diviziuni, cu posibile corecții, a fost scrisă printr-un vot în Adunarea Generală a ONU (2 martie) asupra unei rezoluții de condamnare a atacului rusesc asupra Ucrainei. Dacă numărăm țările care au votat, rezultatul este 141 pentru, 5 împotrivă, 34 abțineri. Când numărăm populația, rezultatul este de aproximativ 75%: 25% în favoarea țărilor care nu au acceptat dictatul american. În ceea ce privește teritoriul, scara este aproximativ aceeași. Într-un sens non-cantitativ, avem o imagine foarte specifică: toate țările care au votat pentru a condamna Rusia sunt pro-americane în orientările lor oficiale. Pe de altă parte, dintre cele 39 de țări care nu s-au alăturat inițiativei americane, puține pot fi descrise ca pro-ruse. Au votat liber. Pentru afirmația că nu a existat un vot liber din partea pro-americană, testul este modul în care vor fi conduse țările care ar vota împotriva Americii. Experiența și bunul simț pot confirma că majoritatea țărilor care au votat „pentru” au făcut acest lucru de teamă de represalii americane. O astfel de întrebare de testare aplicată Rusiei este inutilă, deoarece această parte nu a votat pentru Rusia, ci împotriva Americii și a hegemoniei sale mondiale.

Russia Slaying Khazarian Mafia in Ukraine / Ukraine is just a pawn in the Khazarian Mafia’s game to ‘contain’ Christian Russia. With joint efforts of the Mossad and CIA clandestinely funding Ukraine’s nationalists—”Natz”—as the locals call them, short for “Nazis,” a Ukrainian deep state was created. These “Natz” are descendants of the “Banderites” of World War II fame, with whom Hitler, due to their fanatical viciousness, shunned. With the help of US State Departments’ Jew, Victoria Nuland, (born “Nudelman”), the Banderites executed a coup in 2014. Straightaway an American puppet, known affectionately by Nudelman as “Yats,” a fellow Jew, was installed. Today’s neo-Banderite battalions, fueled by manic hatred of anything “Russian,” got the lion’s share of military aid from the Khazarian Mafia in America that bolstered them for future attacks on Donbas then ultimately on Russia. And with military bases, run by Nato and funded by international Jewish banks—achieving lethal pressure on Russia’s western flank—Putin protested of being squeezed. Today, via surgical attacks on Ukraine’s military infrastructure, not civilian, Russia now controls all Ukrainian airspace.

Blockbuster Exclusive: VT asked Russians what is going on and they responded with an Intel Drop / The following information comes from a Russian intelligence briefing given at my request in Damascus as the entire US is under a 100% censorship blackout. Note: Please email the text of this report to all contacts. In the UK and elsewhere, the text is being scrambled by NATO hackers. VT Senior Editor VT: Read the whole thing as it rambles a bit. There are things in here that won’t be found anywhere else and of course, this is direct from Russian intelligence. This is what journalism is supposed to be. Thus…we can’t attribute that everything here is true just that “they” said it.

Russia is conducting a special unification operation / By rejecting Russian proposals, the Ukrainian leadership may lose the country - It is also worth considering that the special forces of the Ukrainian Armed Forces were regularly trained by military specialists of NATO countries, and now they act quite professionally. In addition, according to the representative of the Russian Defence Ministry, Major General Igor Konashenkov, foreign mercenaries who arrived in Ukraine commit sabotage and raids on Russian convoys of equipment and material supplies, as well as aircraft covering them. We should not forget that in the rear of the Russian group there are still cells of saboteurs and just provocateurs trained by the SBU, who organise protest rallies. Of course, it will also take time to identify and eliminate all these individuals. At the moment, as a result of strikes by the Russian army on headquarters and communication centres, the UAF is beginning to lose control, which was not organised in the best way before, including due to the presence of nationalist units such as "Azov". These units often ignored the instructions of the Ukrainian leadership and acted independently. In addition, the Ukrainian leadership issued weapons to the civilian population without control, which began to use them for any reason. In this regard, even if the main stage of the special operation is completed in March and, as a result of negotiations, certain peace agreements are reached with the Ukrainian side, individual formations of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, pumped up with propaganda and nationalist groups, can continue to offer armed resistance.

Ukrainia Gazeta VII / Les effectifs de l’armée sont passés de 120 000 hommes en 2014 à 200 000. Comme c’est insuffisant, 100 000 paramilitaires s’y sont joints, souvent étrangers et bien mieux payés (3 fois). Là aussi, legs de la garde impériale et du NKVD, payés double. Avec la levée en masse, on eut estimer que 150 000 russes, combattent 450 000 ukrainiens. Le régime survit de « prêts », du FMI qui ne seront jamais remboursés, et d’aides militaires occidentales. L’agriculture est encore une activité importante, et bientôt, avec son évolution, ce ne sera qu’un pays agricole… « Du point de vue opératif, l’offensive russe a été un exemple du genre: en six jours, les Russes se sont emparés d’un territoire aussi vaste que le Royaume-Uni, avec une vitesse de progression plus grande que ce que la Wehrmacht avait réalisé en 1940 ».  L’art opératif est simple, on fonce là où il n’y a pas de résistance. On liquidera le reste plus tard. Comme les connards d’état major ukrainien avaient massés leurs plus importantes troupes et les meilleures, face au Donbass, qu’ils bombardaient copieusement 15 jours avant le début de l’opération russe, pouvant faire penser à une attaque contre les républiques, il était facile de les envelopper. Sans doute, ukrainiens et occidentaux pensaient ils que le conflit serait circonscrit au Donbass, manque de bol, l’Ukraine a été attaqué de tous côtés. Le flux de mercenaires a été tari à l’ouest. Les rouleurs de mécaniques sont des soldats occidentaux. Ils n’ont aucune idée de ce que c’est une guerre sans supériorité militaire absolue et surtout sans supériorité aérienne absolue. Là, ils viennent de découvrir le front de l’est et que les popofs ont des munitions, de tous genres, en quantités impressionnantes (contrairement à l’OTAN), et qu’ils s’en servent. Les guerres que connaissent les mercenaires, ce sont des guerres où les adversaires ont une faible puissance de feu, et seulement l’ingéniosité pour durer. Les talibans, par exemple, n’auraient pas été capables de livrer combat plus de quelques minutes. Face aux russes, ils ne seront pas les chasseurs, amateurs de belles battues et de trophées, mais tomberont sur des adversaires résolus bien armés.

The Crisis in Ukraine is a Planetary Crisis Provoked by the U.S. that Threatens Nuclear War / This is, more accurately, a planetary crisis—close in magnitude to the near-certainty of species extinction within the next century, but in some ways ahead of secondary catastrophes such as the obscene, raging inequality between peoples and nations unleashed by President Ronald Reagan and UK Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher in the early 1980s, and the global conglomerations of immense corporate and plutocratic power. Why is it, then, that the three most important power alliances of the Western and Eurasian worlds—North America, led by the United States alongside its “Trudeauesque” poodle and with the problematic connivance of Mexico’s López Obrador; the European Union and post-Brexit UK; and the Russian Federation, in wobbly alliance with China—consider it worthwhile to suffer intensification of the risks of nuclear annihilation? This, in the face of an abundance of routes available for peaceful settlement, given a minimum of goodwill and genuine humanitarian concern? In the case of Russia, we know very well what these reasons are because Russia has told us—clearly, consistently, loudly, and transparently—for more than 15 years. First and foremost, Russia resents the West’s violation of its unmistakable and supremely important pledge to President Gorbachev in 1990 that the power of NATO would not move one further inch eastward.

Russia Obliterates NATO Doorstep As Iran Joins World War III With Ballistic Missile Strikes / Immediately upon the Biden Regime making this declaration to send more weapons to Ukraine in spite of Russia’s warning, this report notes, it saw Secretary Aleksey Danilov of the Ukrainian National Security asserting: “Today, the head of NATO, Mr. Stoltenberg has made a statement: if a single projectile, a single bullet hits a convoy that is delivering arms to Ukraine, NATO will consider it a trigger for Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty”—an assertion quickly followed by it being reported: “Neither NATO nor Stoltenberg personally have made any public statements on Sunday confirming or denying Danilov’s assertion”—but that didn’t matter anyway, because shortly after Secretary Blinken made his declaration, Russian warplanes fired about 30 cruise missiles at a Ukrainian military base to obliterate it just 15-miles from the Polish border at the very doorstep of NATO that killed at least nine people and wounded 57, and was the westernmost attack of the “Special De-Nazification Operation” to liberate Ukraine.

Grace aux sanctions, Poutine a pu isoler la société russe de l’Occident / L’idée des occidentaux consiste à croire qu’en infligeant suffisamment de souffrance au peuple russe cela provoquerait une réaction politique qui pourrait conduire à l’éviction de Poutine du pouvoir. Mais pour que cette souffrance infligée au peuple apporte un changement politique intérieur significatif, la Russie devrait conserver une certaine relation économique avec l’Occident. Sinon, si les relations sont totalement coupées la douleur sera intense, mais de courte durée. De lui-même, Poutine n’aurait jamais pu séparer la Russie de l’Occident, et ainsi isoler la société russe – et, par extension, sa capacité à gouverner – des sanctions occidentales. Ici, les États-Unis et l’Europe rendent à Poutine une énorme faveur, les sanctions radicales actuelles lui donnent la possibilité de couper radicalement la Russie de son association économique avec l’Occident sans subir les conséquences politiquement fatales d’être considéré comme l’ayant fait de sa propre initiative. Grâce aux sanctions imposées par les États-Unis, Poutine pourra désormais neutraliser définitivement la classe des oligarques russes. Les sanctions ont également neutralisé politiquement cette partie de la classe moyenne russe qui était économiquement liée aux entreprises, biens, services et cultures occidentaux. Poutine a obtenu son divorce d’avec l’occident sans pour autant en payer un prix politique significatif.

“The majority in Russia supports Putin, for them the war is a form of resistance” / There are still many different camps in Russian society. But Putin’s approval ratings have risen since the beginning of the war and despite the sanctions. This does not mean that all Russians support this war. Most of my friends are against it. The liberal intelligentsia, my environment, so to speak, is against it. Many are trying to leave Russia. But the majority supports the government. Why? For them, this war is a form of resistance. And that must sound shocking to most in Europe. [...] The narrative that Putin is omnipotent and everyone is afraid has been wrong for 20  years. When Putin came to power during the war in Chechnya, there were only a few critics of him, including me. Tony Blair, George W. Bush, Gerhard Schroeder, of course, and many others had nothing against him. A UK Prime Minister was proud to be the first western leader to shake the hand of the Russian president, while Russian helicopter gunships were pummelling Chechnya. Until the day before yesterday, it was a mistake or a lie that Russia is a dictatorship, there was freedom of expression. Russian liberals called Putin Hitler well before this war, for no fair reason. I never voted for Putin, but he was not a dictator that everyone was afraid of. That is not the case even now. The opposition media are now gone, but the discussion continues.

The Crash Of A Ukrainian-Originating Drone In Croatia Exposed NATO’s Vulnerabilities / The reported flight path that the drone took before crashing was that it supposedly entered Romanian airspace for three minutes prior to passing through Hungary’s for a whopping 40 minutes before ultimately crashing in Croatia after 6-7 minutes in its airspace. Three NATO countries therefore had the chance to at least shoot it down in theory though none of them attempted to do so despite their air defenses presumably being on higher alert due to the Russia’s special military operation in Ukraine, which borders both Romania and Hungary. This means that the anti-Russian bloc’s pertinent defenses aren’t all that they’re cracked up to be in this part of Europe. In other words, NATO isn’t truly guaranteeing their security interests like it claims is its purpose otherwise someone or another would have tried shooting down that mysterious drone that’s now known to have been armed with explosives. Instead, the bloc let it fly through the airspace of three separate member states prior to crashing and thankfully not killing anyone. It’s presently unclear exactly why this sequence of events unfolded as it did. [...]  In any case, this incident shows that all isn’t as it seems when it comes to NATO’s Balkan air defenses. This is either a blind spot for the anti-Russian bloc’s capabilities or there was some secret coordination between its members (perhaps orchestrated by their US patron) not to shoot down the incoming drone in order to try helping it land safely despite that possibility being very dangerous for the public.

Inevitable Question. / Not to be outdone is yet another dude with "economics" degree, now from The American Conservative. He is in a full cognitive dissonance and goes fully psychotic because of that. "With an economy smaller than the state of Texas, Russia has built strategic weapons superior to many in the American arsenal. These include land as well as submarine-launched hypersonic weapons that can carry nuclear missiles past any American defense, as well as the world’s best air defense system, the S-500. The October 4, 2021, test of Russia’s submarine-launched “Zircon” hypersonic missile was the first-ever underwater firing of a low-altitude weapon that flies at nine times the speed of sound, according to Russian claims. A Russian sub lurking a hundred miles off the American coast could nuke Washington in a flat minute."  [...]  For Goldman (read his bio), countries with the economies "smaller than that of the state of Texas" do not produce what he just described. In fact, Texas on its own, unplugged from the larger economy of the United States, will decline into the third world economy extremely fast and even AS a part of the US will have it economic bottom falling off when trying to R&D and mass produce any weapon system listed by the author. Texas is a wonderful state with good people, but its economy will implode if it tries to build a single SSBN of Borey-class or Air Force such as that of Russia. I will omit here present US education which IS that of the third world and Mr. Goldman, as well as Mr. Issa or any other product of "economic" and "humanities" programs demonstrate fully by parading their ignorance. With "elites" like that the US has no future.

Ukraine & The End Of US World Hegemony / Who wants World War III - For now, we should at least understand the basics: Whoever wants Ukraine to join NATO – supports World War III. Whoever demands No Flight Zone over Ukraine – supports World War III. Whoever sends even more weapons and military equipment to Ukraine - wants to extend the current conflict, deepen the tragedy of the Ukrainian nation and increase the threat of the outbreak of World War III. Whoever allows Kiev or NATO fighters to start from Polish, Lithuanian, Turkish or other NATO airports to fight against the Russians – will lead to World War III.

More Capital Felony HIGH TREASON Revealed! ! ! /  [...] French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and Israeli Prime Minister Bennett had a four-way conference call with Russian President Vladimir Putin in which more 9/11 Russian satellite electronic dealing with the 9/11 black op attack on the American People was handed over to Macron, Schultz and the Israeli Prime Minister. The evidence deals with the fact that a missile not a Boeing aircraft hit the Pentagon. Putin then presented direct evidence that it was Israeli Mossad Unit 8200 based in Secaucus, New Jersey who planted nano-thermite explosives in the World Trade Center towers 48 hours prior to the 9/11 black op attack on the American People. These were the ‘Dancing Israeli’ files that four U.S. administrations have covered up for over 20 years. Project Blue Beam holographic images were used on the NYC World Trade Center towers on 9/11 -  no planes hit the towers! ! ! 

5 comentarii :

Anonim spunea...

un clip de 23 de secunde...

https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/101/711/923/original/c3e435c57d52b9f4.mp4?_=12

Gabriel spunea...

Un pic de gândire pozitivă în privința noastră: Iohannis continuă trendul pozitiv pe care s-a înscris începând cu eliminarea extremiștilor globaliști de la guvernare în 2021.
Pe el și pe Ciucă nu i-am văzut la Kiev ca pe nenorociții ăia de premieri din Polonia, Cehia și Slovacia. Tăcerea și absența pot fi niște declarații puternice pentru cine e atent. La urma urmelor, România are frontieră cu Ucraina, nu Cehia, iar Slovacia are o palmă de loc pe post de frontieră.
Iată un extras din declarația de la Chișinău din 16 martie, istorică am putea spune pentru că marchează o distanțare de licurici care n-aș fi crezut să se întâmple (din nou, pentru cine e atent): "Situația tragică din Ucraina nu trebuie să ne facă să uităm că pe teritoriul Republicii Moldova există, încă, un conflict prelungit. Reafirm aici, la Chișinău, sprijinul deplin al României pentru soluționarea politică a problemei transnistrene, cu respectarea suveranității și integrității teritoriale ale Republicii Moldova în frontierele sale recunoscute internațional și fără afectarea parcursului său pro-european."
Două elemente-cheie aici: cuvântul "politică" e unul. Deci România susține soluționarea politică, nu altfel de soluționare. De asemenea, nu se dorește afectarea parcursului european (nimic despre cel atlantic, Moldova e neutră și Maia nu vrea să schimbe asta), deci este exclus un conflict militar din inițiativă româno-moldavă, nu te poți integra în UE în stare de război.
Poate duc interpretarea prea departe, dar cumva e o sugestie privind posibilitatea despărțirii de regiunile separatiste? Adică, vrem o soluționare politică, dar care să nu afecteze parcursul european, deși Transnistria și Găgăuzia nu vor integrare europeană. Cam asta reiese.

Riddick spunea...

Aaa, da - citisem ceva despre "atribuirea în fals" a imaginilor, şi văzusem un gif Kiev/Liban, iar acum e mai clar.

Nu este important ce apare public, ca mesaj - observ că vizita "neaşteptată" la Chişinău s-a întâmplat după vizita vixepreşedintelui Kamala Harris - probabil Ioh-Anus s-a dus cu nişte mesaje verbale pe care a avut ordin să le ducă, desigur după "activarea unor capacităţi" pe aici prin România. În MD va urma "ceva", cu adresa pentru noi, cei din RO. Chiar şi pentru "secesiunea benevolă", acum e prea târziu pentru întocmirea actelor - ea va avea loc explicit sau implicit, prin ocuparea integrală a teritoriului MD. Dar pentru varianta a doua ruşii vcor trebui să vină cu un pretext - deşi o pot face şi fără, "la aşa costuri, deja anunţate, intră şi asta".

Gabriel spunea...

Nu știu ce s-a comunicat în secret, însă poziția oficială s-a îndepărtat de linia războinică polono-americană. Au fost și alte semne - eliminarea extremiștilor globaliști, trecerea lui Cîțu pe linie moartă și aducerea PSD este posibil să fi pregătit tocmai aceste mișcări. Depărtarea în ultimul moment de extremismul americano-polon. E posibil să fi fost la Chișinău tocmai ca să comunice asta. Să nu se aventureze ca Ucraina.

Riddick spunea...

Mda, aparent este aşa. Dar l-am studiat bine pe kraut - deşi ridicat în politică pe bani din Germania (chiar pornind din perioada ante-2000), el este omul globaliştilor, adică... al #quasarilor / al Licuriciului. Aşa că nu-l mai cred decât atunci când nu s-o mai aburi o oglindă ţinută aproape da faţa lui - "dacă ştii ce zic". ;-)


Citate din gândirea profundă a europeiştilor RO

Adrian Papahagi, 2011: "Înainte de a fi români, am fost europeni. Și creștini. Ce altceva suntem decât un amestec rasial daco-romano-slavo-cuman? De ce ne temem, așadar, de Statele Unite ale Europei, de parcă am pierde mai mult decât am câștiga? De parcă acquis-ul comunitar nu prevalează deja asupra legislațiilor naționale. Acest proiect nu e nou; el a fost doar diluat pe parcurs. Este proiectul federalist al creștin-democraților care în anii 1940-50 au pus bazele Uniunii Europene. Un proiect abandonat la jumătate de drum: Parlament European, dar nu și guvern federal european. Monedă unică, fără guvernanță financiară unică. Spațiu comun de securitate, fără armată comună. A venit momentul să desăvârşim proiectul gândit de Robert Schuman, Alcide de Gasperi, Konrad Adenauer, Grigore Gafencu și alți politicieni creștin-democrați după cel de-al doilea război mondial."

 

Postări populare: