04 februarie 2011

Soros: "Israelul este obstacolul principal"



washingtonpost.com

Why Obama has to get Egypt right

By George Soros
Thursday, February 3, 2011  


Revolutions usually start with enthusiasm and end in tears. In the case of the Middle East, the tears could be avoided if President Obama stands firmly by the values that got him elected. Although American power and influence in the world have declined, our allies and their armies look to us for direction. These armies are strong enough to maintain law and order as long as they stay out of politics; thus the revolutions can remain peaceful. That is what the United States should insist on while encouraging corrupt and repressive rulers who are no longer tolerated by their people to step aside and allow new leaders to be elected in free and fair elections.[...]

Egypt is more complex and, ultimately, more influential, which is why it is so important to get it right. The protesters are very diverse, including highly educated and common people, young and old, well-to-do and desperately poor. While the slogans and crowds in Tahrir Square are not advancing a theocratic agenda at all, the best-organized political opposition that managed to survive in that country's repressive environment is the Muslim Brotherhood. In free elections, the Brotherhood is bound to emerge as a major political force, though it is far from assured of a majority. [...]

That would be regrettable. President Obama personally and the United States as a country have much to gain by moving out in front and siding with the public demand for dignity and democracy. This would help rebuild America's leadership and remove a lingering structural weakness in our alliances that comes from being associated with unpopular and repressive regimes. Most important, doing so would open the way to peaceful progress in the region. The Muslim Brotherhood's cooperation with Mohamed ElBaradei, the Nobel laureate who is seeking to run for president, is a hopeful sign that it intends to play a constructive role in a democratic political system. As regards contagion, it is more likely to endanger the enemies of the United States - Syria and Iran - than our allies, provided that they are willing to move out ahead of the avalanche.

The main stumbling block is Israel. In reality, Israel has as much to gain from the spread of democracy in the Middle East as the United States has. But Israel is unlikely to recognize its own best interests because the change is too sudden and carries too many risks. And some U.S. supporters of Israel are more rigid and ideological than Israelis themselves. Fortunately, Obama is not beholden to the religious right, which has carried on a veritable vendetta against him. The American Israel Public Affairs Committee is no longer monolithic or the sole representative of the Jewish community. The main danger is that the Obama administration will not adjust its policies quickly enough to the suddenly changed reality.

I am, as a general rule, wary of revolutions. But in the case of Egypt, I see a good chance of success. As a committed advocate of democracy and open society*, I cannot help but share in the enthusiasm that is sweeping across the Middle East. I hope President Obama will expeditiously support the people of Egypt. My foundations are prepared to contribute what they can. In practice, that means establishing resource centers for supporting the rule of law, constitutional reform, fighting corruption and strengthening democratic institutions in those countries that request help in establishing them, while staying out of those countries where such efforts are not welcome.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/02/AR2011020206091.html


>> Pentru Soros, "societatea deschisă"şi "capitalismul" sunt lucruri diferite !

>> Wikipedia:

Lifnei iver (Hebrew: לפני עיור ; before the blind) is one of the 613 mitzvot (commandments) in Jewish law. The regulation is ultimately based upon a statement in the Torah:
Before the blind, do not put a stumbling block"[1]
Deuteronomy lists a similar statement among the curses to be annually announced on Mount Ebal:
Cursed be he that makes the blind wander out of the way[2]
Lifnei iver is one of the offenses which the Talmud argues to be punishable by the Cherem. The stumbling block as a distinct, and negative, concept is also established in Christian theology: in Catholicism it is known as creating scandal.

5 comentarii :

Crystal Clear spunea...

Soros -Marele "Emperor Globalist"- grandoman-a dat tonul si toate ONG-urile ,ongistii si ongistele il urmeaza cu strictete.
Altfel nu-si mai iau banii....


Si unii inca mai cred ca exista revolutii spontane..

Riddick spunea...

Încep să cred că s-a dereglat definitiv la mansardă moşu'.

Crystal Clear spunea...

Exact la asta m-am gandit si eu
E dus cu pluta rau.....

anarchix spunea...

Nu s-a dereglat deloc. E pur si simplu un left wing antisemit de spetza lui Jimmy Carter. Incep sa cred ca Beck are dreptate in ceea ce priveste alianta intre comunisti si islamisti.

Urmeaza timpuri interesante, anyway.

Riddick spunea...

Pe deasupra, şi colaborator cu naziştii, chit că era minor (13-14 ani):

Puppetmaster/Nazi Collaborator Soros Demands Cheney Be Investigated

http://thecanadiansentinel.blogspot.com/2009/04/puppetmasternazi-collaborator-soros.html


Citate din gândirea profundă a europeiştilor RO

Andrei Cornea, 2011: "Dacă statele rămân suverane, ele vor continua să facă ceea ce cred şi ceea ce consideră că le este de folos, în pofida intereselor comune. Rezultă că trebuie mers înainte – mai repede sau mai încet – spre un sistem federal sau măcar confederal, cu un guvern central dotat cu puteri mari în domeniul economiei, apărării şi externelor, cu un parlament bicameral după modelul american şi cu guverne ale statelor responsabile numai pentru afacerile interne, justiţie, educaţie, cultură, eventual sănătate şi muncă. Căci atunci când vorbim despre pierderea suveranităţii naţionale, despre cine anume vorbim în fapt ca fiind „perdanţii“? Despre plătitorii obişnuiţi de impozite, cu rate la bănci, cu salarii ameninţate ba de tăieri, ba de inflaţie? Despre pensionarii cu pensiile în pericol? Despre beneficiarii sistemelor de asigurări ce acumulează datorii peste datorii? Despre şomeri? Nu, ci vorbim despre elitele politice europene din cele 27 de state. Ele sunt acelea care şi-ar pierde suveranitatea – mai ales aceea de a cheltui nestăvilit şi de a face promisiuni imposibil de ţinut. Vor trebui să se consoleze mulţi parlamentari naţionali cu un rol mai modest (dar deloc neglijabil). Dintre miniştrii şi funcţionarii guvernamentali, unii, precum cei de la externe sau de la armată, vor trebui să dispară pur şi simplu."

 

Postări populare: