04 noiembrie 2017

Neil Armstrong's Cryptic Message Explained


Yoda: [Deleted Scene - A dying Yoda confesses to Luke the truth about Darth Vader] Unfortunate that you must rush to face him - that incomplete your training was... that not ready for the burden were you. Obi-Wan would had told you long ago had I let him... now, a great weakness you carry. Fear for you, I do. Fear for you, yes. Face Vader you must and "sorry" will not help.
(Star Wars, Return of the Jedi)

La "Spirala norvegiană" (începând de la 1:28 în clip) se vede clar un fel de fum/câmp/lumină (slabă) de culoare albastru-deschis (gen "fulger/arc electric"). De la sol spre centrul spiralei şi care îşi schimbă forma, ca şi când între centrul spiralei şi sol ar exista o interacţiune permanentă "wireless". Nu prea ţine explicaţia oficială, că "a fost un motor al unei rachete (ruseşti/Bulava?) care a explodat 'gradual' la o 'lansare experimentală' iar jetul tangenţial a imprimat o mişcare de titirez". Ăla nu-i "fum de la lansare" nicidecum. Unii zic că s-a încercat deschiderea unei "porţi energetice" (sau "interdimensionale") iar încercarea ar fi eşuat; mai apoi s-a trecut la hyper reactorul CERN (The Large Hadron Collider).

3 comentarii :

Riddick spunea...

Neil Armstrong's Cryptic Message Explained

On the 25th anniversary of Apollo 11's landing on the moon, Neil Armstrong left a very cryptic message. This is an explanation of what he said. The greatest secret in human history is being kept from us. But, why?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3s8gBoaKg0

https://www.youtube.com/user/sonofmabarker/videos


Truth’s Protective Layers

Things get interesting from 4’55” on when Armstrong addresses the students in attendance. I quote the whole passage:

“Today we have with us a group of students, among America’s best. To you we say we have only completed a beginning. We leave you much that is undone. There are great ideas undiscovered, breakthroughs available to those who can remove one of the truth’s protective layers. There are places to go beyond belief. Those challenges are yours–in many fields, not the least of which is space, because there lies human destiny.”

One of the truth’s protective layers?

This can easily be interpreted as Armstrong admitting that some things are concealed from public knowledge. Ever since he and Buzz Aldrin landed on the moon in 1969, there have been speculations on whether it actually happened at all, or if it happened the public is not informed on the true nature of the mission. It was even suggested that Stanley Kubrick was hired to make the moon landing videos we ”know” to be real, in the studio! Furthermore, Kubrick’s classic horror film Shining has been interpreted as being a kind of ”openly secret” confession to faking the moon landing footage… This, among other interesting/amusing interpretations are featured in the 2012 documentary film Room 237 by Rodney Ascher.

Back to the speech. Right after saying ”truth’s protective layers” Armstrong seems to look over his shoulders, as if checking out what president Clinton, vice president Gore and some members of the Congress present thought about his words. This is speculation, though, since the video zooms in on Armstrong, the others remaining outside of the view. Another speculative remark I made is Armstrong seems slightly hesitant, or emotional, at that moment, compared to his generally positive and relaxed presence.

Looking at the video’s comments on YouTube and elsewhere on the web, Armstrong’s body language can be interpreted in many ways. Naturally the online comments are not to be taken as expert views on body language or anything, but they do tell something about how Armstrong’s speech and performance can be interpreted.3

http://blog.nikoskorpio.net/2016/04/30/truths-protective-layers/

Riddick spunea...

First man on moon dies along with secrets of what he saw


Mission Control: What's there ? Mission Control calling Apollo 11.

Apollo 11: These babies are huge, sir … enormous…. Oh, God, you wouldn't believe it! I'm telling you there are other space craft out there… lined up on the far side of the crater edge… they're on the moon watching us. (Above Top Secret, p. 384.)


The HAM operator’s radio intercept was widely dismissed by the media, but in 1975 it received unexpected support. Maurice Chatelain, is a retired NASA communications engineer who helped develop the communications system used in the Apollo moon missions. In his 1975 book, Our Cosmic Ancestors, he wrote:

[O]nly moments before Armstrong stepped down the ladder to set foot on the Moon, two UFOs hovered overhead. Edwin Aldrin took several pictures of them. Some of these photographs have been published in the June 1975 issue of Modern People magazine.” (p. 25)

Later, in 1979, Chatelain said that Armstrong’s sighting of two UFOs over a lunar crater was being deliberately kept from the media and public by NASA: “The encounter was common knowledge in NASA, but nobody has talked about it until now.”  Even more remarkably, Chatelain claimed that:

…all Apollo and Gemini flights were followed, both at a distance and sometimes also quite closely, by space vehicles of extraterrestrial origin – flying saucers, or UFOs, if you want to call them by that name. Every time it occurred, the astronauts informed Mission Control, who then ordered absolute silence.

Was the missing two minutes of radio silence during the Apollo 11 moon landing an attempt by NASA to cover up what Armstrong really saw on the moon? Were UFO sightings a common occurrence during Apollo missions?

According to Buzz Aldrin in a number of press interviews, Apollo 11 was indeed watched by a UFO during its journey to the moon.

http://exopolitics.org/first-man-on-moon-dies-along-with-secrets-of-what-he-saw/

Riddick spunea...

Later edit

Văzând şi alte poze, apare într-adevar un nor albastru alungit, de fum. După "lansare", şi când se mai luminează niţel (!). Dar de ce albastru? Putea fi "regizat", adăugat ulterior, ca să semene cu culoarea "fumului de lansare"? Care la o privire mai atentă pare totuşi fum, uşor spiralat la început - asta ar arăta o defecţiune imediat după lansare dar de ce "la treapta a treia", care se aprinde foarte târziu, în stratosferă?!

Official Russian explanation

On 10 December 2009, the Russia Ministry of Defence suggested an explanation, stating that a Bulava missile test had failed. According to a spokesman, "The missile's first two stages worked as normal, but there was a technical malfunction at the next third stage of the trajectory." Russian defence analyst Pavel Felgenhauer stated to AFP that "such lights and clouds appear from time to time when a missile fails in the upper layers of the atmosphere and have been reported before ... At least this failed test made some nice fireworks for the Norwegians." Prior to the Russian statement, Jonathan McDowell, an astrophysicist at the Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, had already suggested that the unusual light display occurred when the missile's third stage nozzle was damaged, causing the exhaust to come out sideways and sending the missile into a spin.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Norwegian_spiral_anomaly#Official_Russian_explanation


Citate din gândirea profundă a europeiştilor RO

Andrei Cornea, 2011: "Dacă statele rămân suverane, ele vor continua să facă ceea ce cred şi ceea ce consideră că le este de folos, în pofida intereselor comune. Rezultă că trebuie mers înainte – mai repede sau mai încet – spre un sistem federal sau măcar confederal, cu un guvern central dotat cu puteri mari în domeniul economiei, apărării şi externelor, cu un parlament bicameral după modelul american şi cu guverne ale statelor responsabile numai pentru afacerile interne, justiţie, educaţie, cultură, eventual sănătate şi muncă. Căci atunci când vorbim despre pierderea suveranităţii naţionale, despre cine anume vorbim în fapt ca fiind „perdanţii“? Despre plătitorii obişnuiţi de impozite, cu rate la bănci, cu salarii ameninţate ba de tăieri, ba de inflaţie? Despre pensionarii cu pensiile în pericol? Despre beneficiarii sistemelor de asigurări ce acumulează datorii peste datorii? Despre şomeri? Nu, ci vorbim despre elitele politice europene din cele 27 de state. Ele sunt acelea care şi-ar pierde suveranitatea – mai ales aceea de a cheltui nestăvilit şi de a face promisiuni imposibil de ţinut. Vor trebui să se consoleze mulţi parlamentari naţionali cu un rol mai modest (dar deloc neglijabil). Dintre miniştrii şi funcţionarii guvernamentali, unii, precum cei de la externe sau de la armată, vor trebui să dispară pur şi simplu."

 

Postări populare: