"Falimentul energetic" din Cuba, adică blackout-ul total (căderea totală a sistemului energetic, în mod repetat şi pe durate lungi) este inadmisibil în contextul parteneriatului ruso-chinez cu Cuba. Cum ar veni, "trebuia ceva făcut în toţi aceşti ani".
Dar poate că este doar aparent inadmisibil şi Cuba post-castristă care a legiferat căsatoriile gay NU este în mod real parteneră cu Rusia şi China. Regimul "pe nou" din Cuba, mai precis. Care încă îşi ascunde natura sa reală faţă de cubanezi.
Că doar n-or fi proşti ruşii şi chinezii să pompeze resurse într-un "teritoriu nesigur". Deja au fost mult prea proşti când (aproape) l-au scăpat din mână şi l-au lăsat să devină nesigur.
Iar ceilalţi "parteneri" (vesticii) sunt parteneri doar cu o parte din regimul de la Havana şi merg pe burtă ca să nu-şi pericliteze implanturile.
Yoda: [Deleted Scene - A dying Yoda confesses to Luke the truth about Darth Vader] Unfortunate that you must rush to face him - that incomplete your training was... that not ready for the burden were you. Obi-Wan would had told you long ago had I let him... now, a great weakness you carry. Fear for you, I do. Fear for you, yes. Face Vader you must and "sorry" will not help. (Star Wars, Return of the Jedi)
La "Spirala norvegiană" (începând de la 1:28 în clip) se vede clar un fel de fum/câmp/lumină (slabă) de culoare albastru-deschis (gen "fulger/arc electric"). De la sol spre centrul spiralei şi care îşi schimbă forma, ca şi când între centrul spiralei şi sol ar exista o interacţiune permanentă "wireless". Nu prea ţine explicaţia oficială, că "a fost un motor al unei rachete (ruseşti/Bulava?) care a explodat 'gradual' la o 'lansare experimentală' iar jetul tangenţial a imprimat o mişcare de titirez". Ăla nu-i "fum de la lansare" nicidecum. Unii zic că s-a încercat deschiderea unei "porţi energetice" (sau "interdimensionale") iar încercarea ar fi eşuat; mai apoi s-a trecut la hyper reactorul CERN (The Large Hadron Collider).
Things get interesting from 4’55” on when Armstrong addresses the students in attendance. I quote the whole passage:
“Today we have with us a group of students, among America’s best. To you we say we have only completed a beginning. We leave you much that is undone. There are great ideas undiscovered, breakthroughs available to those who can remove one of the truth’s protective layers. There are places to go beyond belief. Those challenges are yours–in many fields, not the least of which is space, because there lies human destiny.”
One of the truth’s protective layers?
This can easily be interpreted as Armstrong admitting that some things are concealed from public knowledge. Ever since he and Buzz Aldrin landed on the moon in 1969, there have been speculations on whether it actually happened at all, or if it happened the public is not informed on the true nature of the mission. It was even suggested that Stanley Kubrick was hired to make the moon landing videos we ”know” to be real, in the studio! Furthermore, Kubrick’s classic horror film Shining has been interpreted as being a kind of ”openly secret” confession to faking the moon landing footage… This, among other interesting/amusing interpretations are featured in the 2012 documentary film Room 237 by Rodney Ascher.
Back to the speech. Right after saying ”truth’s protective layers” Armstrong seems to look over his shoulders, as if checking out what president Clinton, vice president Gore and some members of the Congress present thought about his words. This is speculation, though, since the video zooms in on Armstrong, the others remaining outside of the view. Another speculative remark I made is Armstrong seems slightly hesitant, or emotional, at that moment, compared to his generally positive and relaxed presence.
Looking at the video’s comments on YouTube and elsewhere on the web, Armstrong’s body language can be interpreted in many ways. Naturally the online comments are not to be taken as expert views on body language or anything, but they do tell something about how Armstrong’s speech and performance can be interpreted.3
First man on moon dies along with secrets of what he saw
Mission Control: What's there ? Mission Control calling Apollo 11.
Apollo 11: These babies are huge, sir … enormous…. Oh, God, you wouldn't believe it! I'm telling you there are other space craft out there… lined up on the far side of the crater edge… they're on the moon watching us. (Above Top Secret, p. 384.)
The HAM operator’s radio intercept was widely dismissed by the media, but in 1975 it received unexpected support. Maurice Chatelain, is a retired NASA communications engineer who helped develop the communications system used in the Apollo moon missions. In his 1975 book, Our Cosmic Ancestors, he wrote:
[O]nly moments before Armstrong stepped down the ladder to set foot on the Moon, two UFOs hovered overhead. Edwin Aldrin took several pictures of them. Some of these photographs have been published in the June 1975 issue of Modern People magazine.” (p. 25)
Later, in 1979, Chatelain said that Armstrong’s sighting of two UFOs over a lunar crater was being deliberately kept from the media and public by NASA: “The encounter was common knowledge in NASA, but nobody has talked about it until now.” Even more remarkably, Chatelain claimed that:
…all Apollo and Gemini flights were followed, both at a distance and sometimes also quite closely, by space vehicles of extraterrestrial origin – flying saucers, or UFOs, if you want to call them by that name. Every time it occurred, the astronauts informed Mission Control, who then ordered absolute silence.
Was the missing two minutes of radio silence during the Apollo 11 moon landing an attempt by NASA to cover up what Armstrong really saw on the moon? Were UFO sightings a common occurrence during Apollo missions?
Văzând şi alte poze, apare într-adevar un nor albastru alungit, de fum. După "lansare", şi când se mai luminează niţel (!). Dar de ce albastru? Putea fi "regizat", adăugat ulterior, ca să semene cu culoarea "fumului de lansare"? Care la o privire mai atentă pare totuşi fum, uşor spiralat la început - asta ar arăta o defecţiune imediat după lansare dar de ce "la treapta a treia", care se aprinde foarte târziu, în stratosferă?!
Official Russian explanation
On 10 December 2009, the Russia Ministry of Defence suggested an explanation, stating that a Bulava missile test had failed. According to a spokesman, "The missile's first two stages worked as normal, but there was a technical malfunction at the next third stage of the trajectory." Russian defence analyst Pavel Felgenhauer stated to AFP that "such lights and clouds appear from time to time when a missile fails in the upper layers of the atmosphere and have been reported before ... At least this failed test made some nice fireworks for the Norwegians." Prior to the Russian statement, Jonathan McDowell, an astrophysicist at the Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, had already suggested that the unusual light display occurred when the missile's third stage nozzle was damaged, causing the exhaust to come out sideways and sending the missile into a spin.
Călin Popescu-Tăriceanu, 2008: "Vom da astăzi, în Parlamentul României, un vot istoric - votul pentru ratificarea Tratatului de reformă al Uniunii Europene. Pentru România este mai mult decât un moment festiv. Ratificarea Tratatului de reformă marchează o etapă. Spun acest lucru din două motive. Pe de o parte, este o primă etapă pe care noi am parcurs-o în cadrul Uniunii Europene, după aderarea de la 1 ianuarie 2007. Am avut şansa să contribuim la negocierea şi la construirea acestui Tratat, beneficiind de aceleaşi drepturi şi având aceleaşi obligaţii ca oricare altă ţară europeană. Este cel dintâi tratat european semnat de România, în calitate de stat membru al Uniunii Europene. Simbolic, este primul document al Europei extinse, negociat şi semnat în format UE 27. Pentru toate aceste motive, odată cu ratificarea de către Parlament, putem spune că este cel dintâi tratat european pe care România îşi pune efectiv amprenta, conform intereselor sale, nemaifiind în postura de a prelua ceea ce au negociat şi au decis alţii. Doamnelor şi domnilor senatori şi deputaţi, în urmă cu trei ani, prin votul dumneavoastră, România a ratificat Tratatul constituţional ["Constituţia UE", caducă], odată cu ratificarea Tratatului de aderare la Uniunea Europeană. Aşa cum ştiţi, Tratatul constituţional nu a putut intra în vigoare. Din fericire, aşa cum noi am susţinut în timpul negocierilor, inovaţiile din acest document au fost preluate în Tratatul de la Lisabona. Aceste inovaţii sunt un pas înainte faţă de tratatele europene în vigoare acum."
Postări populare:
ROMÂNIA !
NUROM.EU.NIA
NU REGIONALIZĂRII ! NU AUSTERITĂŢII ! NU MONEDEI EURO ! AFARĂ CU TRUPELE ŞI BAZELE STRĂINE !
OPRIŢI DEZMĂŢUL ANTINAŢIONAL!
"Unui lucru fără cale, cale dând, alte lucruri fără cale vor urma"
At 6:57 PM EDT, reports began coming in of several explosions in the Iran capital city of Tehran.
Initial, unconfirmed information says that at least one building belonging to the Iran Ministry of Defense, has exploded.
More as I get it. . .
7:07 PM EDT
Israeli war planes are now crossing the Syria-Jordan Border heading in the direction of Iraq.
7:11 PM EDT --
Residents in Northwestern Iran report hearing Aircraft in the Sky over the Iran-Iraq Border.
-- Imam Khomenei International Airport Hit by explosions
-- Iran CLOSES all air space.
-- Military correspondent for Israel's channel 13: "Report of explosions west of Tehran. We are going on air on channel 13"
-- 6 explosions in Karaj and 4-5 explosions in Tehran so far. Still unconfirmed.
7:20 PM EDT --
Air Control Towers throughout the Middle East are broadcasting EMERGENCY MESSAGES TO CLEAR AIR SPACE immediately
7:25 PM EDT --
Reports are now confirming there have already been NINETEEN (19) Explosions in Tehran.
7:31 PM EDT --
Air Raid Sirens sounding throughout Iran.
7:34 PM EDT --
Civilian power plant in Karaj, Iran, reportedly "destroyed."
7:57 PM EDT --
Both U.S. and Israeli Officials are now openly stating they expect that the Strikes will warrant a Military Response from Iran.
-- Initial reports that the IDF launched a number of airstrikes in Syria against radar installations prior to striking Iran.
********** F L A S H **********
Unconfirmed reports CLAIM United States B-2 Stealth Bombers have been seen crossing into Iranian Air Space. If this is correct, and it is as yet UNCONFIRMED, then the U.S. appears to be going after the Iran Nuclear Program.
UPDATE 8:05 PM EDT --
The Israeli Defense Force has issued an official statement CONFIRMING Israel is attacking Iran.
***** BULLETIN *****
8:06 PM EDT --
Just literally moments ago, live from inside the West Bank "very large
number of Fighter Jets and refueling planes in the skies of Palestine,
on their way to Iran. The strikes heard in Iran seem to be initial, it seems that the IDF was testing Iran's Air-Defenses before launching its main attack,
8:27 PM EDT --
Skies
over Tehran are now quiet. No further explosions in past 15 minutes.
LIVE UPDATES ARE CONTINUING . . . . New developments as I get them, will
appear below.
Postări
3 comentarii :
Neil Armstrong's Cryptic Message Explained
On the 25th anniversary of Apollo 11's landing on the moon, Neil Armstrong left a very cryptic message. This is an explanation of what he said. The greatest secret in human history is being kept from us. But, why?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3s8gBoaKg0
https://www.youtube.com/user/sonofmabarker/videos
Truth’s Protective Layers
Things get interesting from 4’55” on when Armstrong addresses the students in attendance. I quote the whole passage:
“Today we have with us a group of students, among America’s best. To you we say we have only completed a beginning. We leave you much that is undone. There are great ideas undiscovered, breakthroughs available to those who can remove one of the truth’s protective layers. There are places to go beyond belief. Those challenges are yours–in many fields, not the least of which is space, because there lies human destiny.”
One of the truth’s protective layers?
This can easily be interpreted as Armstrong admitting that some things are concealed from public knowledge. Ever since he and Buzz Aldrin landed on the moon in 1969, there have been speculations on whether it actually happened at all, or if it happened the public is not informed on the true nature of the mission. It was even suggested that Stanley Kubrick was hired to make the moon landing videos we ”know” to be real, in the studio! Furthermore, Kubrick’s classic horror film Shining has been interpreted as being a kind of ”openly secret” confession to faking the moon landing footage… This, among other interesting/amusing interpretations are featured in the 2012 documentary film Room 237 by Rodney Ascher.
Back to the speech. Right after saying ”truth’s protective layers” Armstrong seems to look over his shoulders, as if checking out what president Clinton, vice president Gore and some members of the Congress present thought about his words. This is speculation, though, since the video zooms in on Armstrong, the others remaining outside of the view. Another speculative remark I made is Armstrong seems slightly hesitant, or emotional, at that moment, compared to his generally positive and relaxed presence.
Looking at the video’s comments on YouTube and elsewhere on the web, Armstrong’s body language can be interpreted in many ways. Naturally the online comments are not to be taken as expert views on body language or anything, but they do tell something about how Armstrong’s speech and performance can be interpreted.3
http://blog.nikoskorpio.net/2016/04/30/truths-protective-layers/
First man on moon dies along with secrets of what he saw
Mission Control: What's there ? Mission Control calling Apollo 11.
Apollo 11: These babies are huge, sir … enormous…. Oh, God, you wouldn't believe it! I'm telling you there are other space craft out there… lined up on the far side of the crater edge… they're on the moon watching us. (Above Top Secret, p. 384.)
The HAM operator’s radio intercept was widely dismissed by the media, but in 1975 it received unexpected support. Maurice Chatelain, is a retired NASA communications engineer who helped develop the communications system used in the Apollo moon missions. In his 1975 book, Our Cosmic Ancestors, he wrote:
[O]nly moments before Armstrong stepped down the ladder to set foot on the Moon, two UFOs hovered overhead. Edwin Aldrin took several pictures of them. Some of these photographs have been published in the June 1975 issue of Modern People magazine.” (p. 25)
Later, in 1979, Chatelain said that Armstrong’s sighting of two UFOs over a lunar crater was being deliberately kept from the media and public by NASA: “The encounter was common knowledge in NASA, but nobody has talked about it until now.” Even more remarkably, Chatelain claimed that:
…all Apollo and Gemini flights were followed, both at a distance and sometimes also quite closely, by space vehicles of extraterrestrial origin – flying saucers, or UFOs, if you want to call them by that name. Every time it occurred, the astronauts informed Mission Control, who then ordered absolute silence.
Was the missing two minutes of radio silence during the Apollo 11 moon landing an attempt by NASA to cover up what Armstrong really saw on the moon? Were UFO sightings a common occurrence during Apollo missions?
According to Buzz Aldrin in a number of press interviews, Apollo 11 was indeed watched by a UFO during its journey to the moon.
http://exopolitics.org/first-man-on-moon-dies-along-with-secrets-of-what-he-saw/
Later edit
Văzând şi alte poze, apare într-adevar un nor albastru alungit, de fum. După "lansare", şi când se mai luminează niţel (!). Dar de ce albastru? Putea fi "regizat", adăugat ulterior, ca să semene cu culoarea "fumului de lansare"? Care la o privire mai atentă pare totuşi fum, uşor spiralat la început - asta ar arăta o defecţiune imediat după lansare dar de ce "la treapta a treia", care se aprinde foarte târziu, în stratosferă?!
Official Russian explanation
On 10 December 2009, the Russia Ministry of Defence suggested an explanation, stating that a Bulava missile test had failed. According to a spokesman, "The missile's first two stages worked as normal, but there was a technical malfunction at the next third stage of the trajectory." Russian defence analyst Pavel Felgenhauer stated to AFP that "such lights and clouds appear from time to time when a missile fails in the upper layers of the atmosphere and have been reported before ... At least this failed test made some nice fireworks for the Norwegians." Prior to the Russian statement, Jonathan McDowell, an astrophysicist at the Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, had already suggested that the unusual light display occurred when the missile's third stage nozzle was damaged, causing the exhaust to come out sideways and sending the missile into a spin.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Norwegian_spiral_anomaly#Official_Russian_explanation
Trimiteți un comentariu